Development of a Partograph E-learning Tool and Evaluation of Its Efficiency in Student Midwives

June 20, 2023 updated by: Damla Kizilca Cakaloz, Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Development of a Partograph E-learning Tool and Evaluation of Its Efficiency in Student Midwives in Turkey: A Randomized Controlled Experimental Study

A randomized control trial was made to develop a partograph e-learning tool and evaluate its effectiveness in student midwives in Turkey.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

With the use of a partograph, complications are detected and intervened promptly, and unnecessary applications are avoided. Therefore, it has become an integral part of the practices of midwives who manage normal births under their responsibility to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. One of the intrapartum care services of midwives is to detect prolonged labor, especially with the use of a partograph, and to apply quick and accurate intervention. However, the partograph is not widely used all over the world at the desired level.

Recently, the use of the e-learning system, which is recommended as a method of obtaining and perceiving information easily, has increased considerably. Although this is a new concept in our country, it has started to be adopted rapidly.

In our country, there is no study on the use of e-learning in midwifery practices. However, in many international studies, it is stated that e-learning is acceptable and more practical and effective than classical methods in midwifery education and practices. This research was designed as a randomized controlled experimental study to develop an e-learning tool that could be an alternative to midwifery students' learning of the use of a partograph and to evaluate its effectiveness.

The hypothesis was tested that there is a significant difference between the students who received and did not receive training with the partograph e-learning tool in terms of post-test education achievement scores. In addition, it was found that there is a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test education achievement scores of the students who received training with the partograph e-learning tool.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

93

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Efeler
      • Aydin, Efeler, Turkey, 09100
        • Adnan Menderes University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Studying in the 3rd year of the midwifery undergraduate program
  • Those who took the Childbirth and Postpartum Period Lecture and enrolled in the Childbirth and Postpartum Period At Risk Lecture
  • Able to use the internet and computer
  • Having an e-mail address with which he can communicate over the internet
  • Students with internet access

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students who could not continue their education due to reasons (Registration freeze, lateral transfer, health problems, etc.) were excluded from the research.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Education Group
The education group was applied partograph education in addition to formal education by using the partograph e-learning tool that was developed.
Two online meetings were planned with the education group. In the first meeting, an average of 35-minute-long live lecturing was performed on filling out the data forms and using the partograph e-learning tool through e-learning tool created in the first interview. The researcher held the second interview one week after the first one. In the second interview, a live lecture lasting 30 minutes was given to talk about and solve the problems that students experienced with the partograph e-learning tool and answer the questions. The partograph e-learning tool was kept open for one month for the students in the education group. At the end of the one-month education, the students were asked to fill out the post-test (Academic Achievement Test) defined in the system. After the post-test was completed, the system was closed to the access of the students in the education group and made available to the students in the control group.
No Intervention: Control Group
The control group continued their formal education.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acadeic Achievement Test before intervention (Pretest)
Time Frame: After randomization, in the first meeting
The Academic Achievement Test consisted of eight multiple-choice questions and two case scenarios about knowledge, skills, and synthesis on the use of the partograph in labor. For each question regarding the partograph knowledge level, correct answers were scored 2 and incorrect answers 0. The minimum score on the knowledge is a 0; maximum is 16. For partograph filling skills, students systematically reviewed each case and filled out partographs with the given information and were evaluated one by one according to individual partograph components. The minimum score on the both cases are a 0; maximum is 34. For the partograph synthesis, open-ended interpretation questions were added to the end of each case. The minimum score on the partograph synthesis are a 0; maximum is 10. In total, the minimum possible score on the the Academic Achievement Test is a 0; maximum is 60. Higher scores indicate greater levels of Academic Achievement.
After randomization, in the first meeting
Acadeic Achievement Test after intervention (Posttest )
Time Frame: One month after the pretest.
The Academic Achievement Test consisted of eight multiple-choice questions and two case scenarios about knowledge, skills, and synthesis on the use of the partograph in labor. For each question regarding the partograph knowledge level, correct answers were scored 2 and incorrect answers 0. The minimum score on the knowledge is a 0; maximum is 16. For partograph filling skills, students systematically reviewed each case and filled out partographs with the given information and were evaluated one by one according to individual partograph components. The minimum score on the both cases are a 0; maximum is 34. For the partograph synthesis, open-ended interpretation questions were added to the end of each case. The minimum score on the partograph synthesis are a 0; maximum is 10. In total, the minimum possible score on the the Academic Achievement Test is a 0; maximum is 60. Higher scores indicate greater levels of Academic Achievement.
One month after the pretest.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Damla Kizilca Cakaloz, PhD, Adnan Menderes University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Division of Midwifery
  • Study Director: Ayden Coban, PhD, Adnan Menderes University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Division of Midwifery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 28, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Interventional study in Turkey

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 months after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

relevance to the topic of the study and approval of all co-authors within 1 month of receiving the request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Midwifery Students Education

Clinical Trials on Education Group

3
Subscribe