The Effects of Two Different Treatment Protocols on Shoulder Function, Quality of Life, and Ultrasound Parameters in Patients With Frozen Shoulder

October 9, 2023 updated by: Fatmanur Yegin, Istanbul University

The goal of this interventional study is to compare the outcomes of two different injection aprroaches in patients with frozen shoulder. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is hydrodilatation better than intraarticular corticosteroid injection?
  • Is there any prognostic factors that will help clinicians guide their decision making when choosing between these two treatments?

Participans will receive an injection(cortcosteroid and local anesthetics alone or with hydrodilatation-corticosteroid and local anesthetics plus sterile saline solution) and then they will follow a rehabilitation program.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who fulfill the diagnostic criteria for frozen shoulder
  • Agree to participate in the study
  • Having the opportunity to follow up for at least 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusing to participate in the study
  • History of shoulder injection in the last 3 months
  • Having diabetes mellitus
  • Presence of comorbidities that contraindicate injection therapy, such as bleeding diathesis
  • Known history of allergy or anaphylaxis to drugs used in treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ultrasound Guided Hydrodilatation with corticosteroid injection

15 ml intra-articular injection to shoulder via anterior approach under ultrasound guidance

Drugs:

  • betamethasone dipropionate/ betamethasone sodium phosphate(diprospan) (5 mg+2mg/ml) (1 ml)
  • prilocaine hydrochloride %2 (4 ml)
  • Sodium chloride %0,9 (10 ml)
15 ml intra-articular injection to shoulder via anterior approach under ultrasound guidance
Active Comparator: Blind intra-articular corticosteroid injection

5 ml intra-articular blind injection to shoulder via posterior approach

Drugs:

  • betamethasone dipropionate/ betamethasone sodium phosphate(diprospan) (5 mg+2mg/ml) (1 ml)
  • prilocaine hydrochloride %2 (4 ml)
5 ml blind intra-articular corticosteroid injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline pain score on Visual Analog Scale(VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months
Pain scored according to VAS; between 0(no pain) to 10(worst pain)
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months
Change in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index(SPADI) scores
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months
Scored between 0-10 ; 0 means no pain and disability and 10 means the worst pain and disability
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Range of Movement(ROM)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months
Range of shoulder movements assessed with digital inclinometer in sittting and lying positions
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months
Ultrasound Parameters
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months
Coracohumeral ligament(CHL) thickness, axillary pouch(AP) thickness, elastography of deltoid muscle(anterior, middle, and posterior)
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months
Proprioception(Active position sense- joint position error)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months
Shoulder joint is positioned in 30 degree flexion and 15 degree internal and external rotation in lying position, patient is asked to position their joints and errors in degrees noted
Baseline, 3 months
Shoulder Strength
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months
Measured with cybex isokinetic dinamometer, shoulder flexion/extension and shoulder internal/external rotation
Baseline, 3 months
Changes in Depression Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 months, 3 months
measured by Beck's Depression Inventory(between 0 to 40), 0 means no depression and 40 means severe depression
Baseline, 1 months, 3 months
Changes in Life Quality Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months
Items from the SF-36 (Short Form 36) survey, between 0(worst) to 100(best)
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months
Treatment Satisfaction
Time Frame: 3 months
Global Improvement and Satisfaction Score, between 1 to 5, 1 very dissatisfied, and 5 very satisfied
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shoulder Pain

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound Guided Hydrodilatation with corticosteroid injection

3
Subscribe