The Efficacy of Primary Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined With TME Surgery in Low-risk Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (TaLaR-02)

August 8, 2023 updated by: Yanhong Deng, Sun Yat-sen University

TME vs TME+nCT in Low-risk LARC

Comparative analysis of the clinical efficacy between primary Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with TME surgery for low-risk locally advanced rectal cancer. Randomly enrolling eligible patients into either the control group receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with TME surgery or the experimental group receiving primary TME surgery, and subsequently comparing the clinical outcomes of the two groups

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

766

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Chongqing
      • Chongqing, Chongqing, China, 400042
        • Recruiting
        • Daping Hospital, Amy Medeical Univerisity
        • Contact:
          • Weidong Tong, MD,PhD
          • Phone Number: +8613500321218
          • Email: vdtong@163.com
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510655
        • Recruiting
        • Sun yat-sen University, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
    • Hunan
      • Hengyang, Hunan, China, 421001
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China
        • Contact:
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 110004
        • Recruiting
        • Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University
        • Contact:
    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710061
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
        • Contact:
    • Sichuan
      • Nanchong, Sichuan, China, 637000
        • Recruiting
        • The Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Newly diagnosed patients, aged 18 to 75 years;
  2. Pathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma;
  3. Distance of the lower margin of the rectal tumor lesion from the anal margin <15cm;
  4. High-resolution MRI indicates low-risk locally advanced rectal cancer: T1-3bN1-2 or T3aN0 or T3bN0; no involvement of the anal sphincter; negative mesorectal fascia (MRF) status; negative extramural vascular invasion (EMVI); no cancer nodules;
  5. Exclusion of patients with non-local recurrence or distant metastases;
  6. Absence of synchronous colorectal multiple primary cancers;
  7. Adequate physical condition to tolerate surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, and renal functions;
  8. The study physician assessed no difficulty in sphincter preservation;
  9. patients and their families will be willing to participate in this study and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with concurrent other malignancies or a history of malignant tumors in the past;
  2. Patients with intestinal obstruction, intestinal perforation, intestinal bleeding, or other conditions requiring emergency surgery;
  3. Patients with tumor invasion into the external sphincter or levator ani muscles, or involvement of adjacent organs necessitating combined organ resection;
  4. Patients with poor anal function or fecal incontinence before surgery;
  5. Patients with a history of inflammatory bowel disease or familial adenomatous polyposis;
  6. Patients recently diagnosed with other malignancies;
  7. Patients with ASA grade ≥ IV and/or ECOG performance status score > 2;
  8. Patients with severe liver or kidney dysfunction, significant cardiopulmonary impairment, coagulation disorders, or those with extreme underlying conditions unable to tolerate surgery;
  9. Patients with a history of severe mental illness;
  10. Pregnant or lactating women;
  11. Patients with uncontrolled infections before surgery;
  12. Patients with other clinical or laboratory conditions, as determined by the investigator, that render them unsuitable for participation in this trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Primary total mesorectal excision
Patients with low-risk locally advanced rectal cancer received total mesorectal excision alone.
Standard total mesorectal excision
Active Comparator: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus TME
Patients with low-risk locally advanced rectal cancer received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and total mesorectal excision.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen recommended FOLFOX6, XELON, FOLFOX, mFOLFOX for 4-6 courses, and TME surgical treatment after preoperative tumor restaging 1-2 weeks after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3-year Disease Free Survival
Time Frame: 3 years after surgery
Defined as the proportion of patients who did not experience any of the following events from the beginning of the randomized subgroup to the end of the third year, which included disease progression, local recurrence, distant metastasis, or second primary colorectal cancer, or death from any cause.
3 years after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Distance from the inferior resection margin to the tumor
Time Frame: Immediately after the surgery
The length between inferior resection margin and the tumor.
Immediately after the surgery
The status of circumferential margin
Time Frame: Immediately after the surgery
When the distance from the tumor or malignant lymph node to the circumferential margin was ≤ 1 mm, it was recorded as a positive circumferential margin.
Immediately after the surgery
The status of distal resection margin
Time Frame: Immediately after the surgery
When the distance from the tumor to the distal resection margin was ≤ 10 mm, it was recorded as a positive distal resection margin.
Immediately after the surgery
Postiveoperative stay
Time Frame: 1 months after surgery
The days after surgery in the hospital
1 months after surgery
Time to Postoperative first feed
Time Frame: 1 months after surgery
The duration after surgery to first feed
1 months after surgery
Time to Postoperative first gas
Time Frame: 1 months after surgery
The duration after surgery to first gas
1 months after surgery
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: 1 months after surgery
Postoperative pain according to pain socres
1 months after surgery
Postoperative anal function
Time Frame: 3 years after the surgery
Anal function would be based on wexner Incontinence score. A total score of less than ten is considered good, and a score of more than ten is considered poor.
3 years after the surgery
Quality of life score
Time Frame: 3 years after the surgery
Quality of life score would be based on EORTC QoL C30 scale.
3 years after the surgery
3-year overall survival
Time Frame: 3 years after the surgery
3 years after the surgery
5-year Disease Free Survival
Time Frame: 5 years after the surgery
5 years after the surgery
5-year overall survival
Time Frame: 5 years after the surgery
5 years after the surgery
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events
Time Frame: 1 month after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
It would be assessed by CTCAE v4.0
1 month after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Liang Kang, PhD,MD, Sun yat-sen University, Sixth Affiliated Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Reasonable requests can provide relevant data, but must be used anonymously

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on total mesorectal excision

Subscribe