The Breakfast Study

November 17, 2025 updated by: Laura Saslow, University of Michigan

The Breakfast Study: A Small Steps, Low-literacy, Breakfast-focused Dietary Self-management Intervention for Adults With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes

The investigators will conduct an acceptability, feasibility, preliminary effectiveness trial of a 4-month, online, very low-carbohydrate breakfast-focused program in 120 adults with type 2 diabetes. The investigators will measure acceptability and feasibility, plus critical efficacy outcomes, such as changes in HbA1c, anti-hyperglycemic medications, glycemic variability, body weight, blood pressure, and lipids.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

More than 15% of U.S. adults with type 2 diabetes have poorly controlled blood gluocse, here defined as a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level of 7.0% or higher. These adults have an elevated health risk of a variety of outcomes, including amputation and mortality from cardiovascular disease and from all causes. Nutrition- focused interventions can be effective for improving glycemic control, reducing anti-hyperglycemic medications, and reducing body weight, all of which are critical outcomes for adults with type 2 diabetes. However, typical nutrition-focused interventions can be burdensome, often requiring complex instructions and a complete overhaul of one's diet. Additionally, adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes are more likely to have low literacy levels, which can be a barrier for adherence to complex interventions. Therefore, an effective intervention for adults with poorly controlled diabetes who may have lower health literacy levels is necessary to reduce both HbA1c levels and anti-hyperglycemic medications. Carbohydrate intake has the strongest impact on post-prandial glycemia of any dietary factor, and a very low-carbohydrate diet-due to its ability to improve glycemic control-is now recommended by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The investigators hypothesize that some of the benefits of a very low-carbohydrate diet may be available to individuals who change only their breakfasts to be very low-carbohydrate, rather than modifying their entire diet.

Thus, the investigators will conduct an acceptability, feasibility, preliminary effectiveness trial of a 4-month, online, small- steps, low-literacy, very low-carbohydrate breakfast-focused program in 120 adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. The investigators will measure acceptability and feasibility, plus critical efficacy outcomes, such as changes in HbA1c, anti-hyperglycemic medications, glycemic variability, body weight, blood pressure, and lipids.

The investigators will also test whether factors such as sex, health literacy level, and baseline insulin resistance significantly moderate the impact of the intervention on change in HbA1c and change in anti-hyperglycemic medications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

119

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HbA1c 7% or higher
  • 18-80 years old
  • The ability to understand verbal and written English
  • Willingness to follow the prescribed diet
  • Able to consent and follow directions
  • Willingness to regularly check blood glucose levels as required

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning for either in the next 6 months or <6 months postpartum
  • Low C-peptide and possible subsequent GAD 65 level that suggests type 1 diabetes, clinical factors that suggest type 1 diabetes (lean, lack of family history, and diabetic ketoacidosis in the past) or a previous diagnosis of type 1 diabetes or latent autoimmune diabetes
  • Cancer, heart failure, or kidney failure
  • Vegan
  • Untreated mental health condition
  • Currently following a very low-carbohydrate diet or breakfasts
  • Thyroid levels out of range
  • Alcoholism
  • Previous bariatric surgery
  • Difficulty chewing or swallowing
  • Dependence on others for food preparation
  • Currently enrolled in another investigative study that might conflict with this research

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Very low-carbohydrate breakfast
Materials will encourage eating a very low-carbohydrate breakfast (or first meal of the day), with no more than about 5-10 non-fiber (net) grams of carbohydrates each.
We will provide participants recipes and information to support this dietary change.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intervention satisfaction
Time Frame: At 4 months
A 1-item measure about intervention satisfaction. We ask participants, "How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the program?" The item is rated from 1 = very dissatisfied to 6 = very satisfied, with higher scores reflecting greater satisfaction.
At 4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in HbA1c
Time Frame: 0 to 4 months
This will assess the change in the level reported for this outcome
0 to 4 months
Weekly dietary adherence
Time Frame: Weekly over 4 months
A 1-item measure about dietary adherence. We ask participants to reflect on the past week and rate whether they ate a low-carbohydrate breakfast. The item is rated from 1 = not at all to 7 = very much so, with higher scores reflecting greater adherence.
Weekly over 4 months
Change in diabetes treatment satisfaction
Time Frame: 0 to 4 months
The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire is an 8-item measure of satisfaction with current diabetes therapy over the past several weeks. Each item is rated on a 7-point scale. Six items form the Treatment Satisfaction scale, assessing overall satisfaction, perceived convenience and flexibility, understanding of diabetes, and willingness to recommend or continue the current regimen. Two additional items evaluate the perceived frequency of unacceptable hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. The Treatment Satisfaction score is calculated from the six satisfaction items, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction; the two frequency items are scored separately, with higher values reflecting more frequent high or low blood glucose levels.
0 to 4 months
Change in health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 0 to 4 months
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 is a 29-item survey for assessing health-related quality of life across seven domains (Physical function, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep disturbance, Social roles, and Pain interference) plus Pain intensity. All domains are scored using T-scores (mean 50, SD 10), where higher scores indicate better function for functional domains (Physical Function, Social Roles) and worse symptoms for symptom domains (Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Pain Interference).
0 to 4 months
Change in anti-hyperglycemic medications
Time Frame: 0 to 4 months
The Medication Effect Score (MES) quantifies the overall intensity of antiglycemic therapy, with higher scores indicating greater medication requirements. For each diabetes medication, the percentage of the maximum recommended daily dose is multiplied by an adjustment factor reflecting its expected hemoglobin A1c-lowering potency; these values are summed to yield the total MES. Scores range from 0 upward (no fixed maximum), with lower scores reflecting lower medication intensity.
0 to 4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 2, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 9, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

October 17, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Breakfast

Subscribe