Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Compared With Midazolam During Bronchoscopy:Randomised Controlled Trial

August 8, 2023 updated by: Bumhee Yang, MD, Chungbuk National University Hospital

Safety and Efficacy of Remimazolam Compared With Midazolam During Bronchoscopy: A Single Center, Randomized Controlled Study

Objectives: Although remimazolam is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine with a shorter elimination half-life and faster recovery time than midazolam, studies evaluating its safety and efficacy during bronchoscopy are limited. This study compared the safety and efficacy of remimazolam with that of midazolam for bronchoscopy.

Design: A single-center, prospective randomized parallel-group study

Setting: Chungbuk National University Hospital, April 2022-June 2023.

Participants: One hundred patients were enrolled; 51 were randomly assigned to the midazolam group and 49 to the remimazolam group. Respiratory nurse specialists performed the randomization.

Interventions: Oral and laryngeal anesthesia was induced using a 4% lidocaine nebulizer prior to sedation. The vocal cords and lower airway tract were anesthetized.

Patients aged <60 years or weighing >50 kg received 3 mg intravenous midazolam or 5 mg remimazolam. Patients aged ≥60 years or weighing <50 kg received 2 mg intravenous midazolam or 3 mg remimazolam. Bronchoscopy was performed under adequate sedation (MOAA/S≤3)

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the time from the end of the procedure to full alertness. Secondary outcomes were procedural time parameters, satisfaction profiles, and adverse effects.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Chungcheongbuk-do
      • Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea, Republic of, 28644
        • Chungbuk National University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged ≥18 years who required diagnostic or therapeutic bronchoscopy and agreed to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1) pregnancy, 2) moderate-to-severe hepatic impairment and lactose intolerance 3) mechanical ventilation 4) history of tracheostomy 5) poor patient cooperation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Midazolam

Patients aged <60 years or weighing >50 kg were randomly assigned to receive 3 mg intravenous midazolam. In contrast, those aged ≥60 years or with a body weight of <50 kg were assigned 2 mg intravenous.

If adequate sedation was not achieved after the initial sedative administration, additional midazolam (0.5 mg) was administered at intervals of 3-4 min, at the discretion of the physician.

For induction and maintenance of sedation
Active Comparator: Remimazolam

Patients aged <60 years or weighing >50 kg were randomly assigned to receive 5 mg remimazolam. In contrast, those aged ≥60 years or with a body weight of <50 kg were assigned intravenous 3 mg remimazolam.

If adequate sedation was not achieved after the initial sedative administration, additional remimazolam (2.5 mg) was administered at intervals of 3-4 min, at the discretion of the physician.

For induction and maintenance of sedation
Other Names:
  • Remimazolam

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the time from the end of the procedure to full alertness in both groups.
Time Frame: up to 2 hours (MOAA/S had recovered to 5 after the procedure had been completed.)

The Time for patient to recover Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (MOAA/S) scores to 5 after end of bronchoscopy

MOAA/S scores: 5 = Responds readily to name spoken in normal tone [alert], 4 =Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone, 3 = Responds only after name is called loudly and/or repeatedly, 2 = Responds only after mild prodding or shaking, 1 = Responds only after painful trapezius squeeze, 0 = Does not respond to painful trapezius squeeze.

MOAA/S scores were assessed by the investigators.

up to 2 hours (MOAA/S had recovered to 5 after the procedure had been completed.)
the time taken to reach peak sedation
Time Frame: up to 30 minutes (the time to the start of the procedure after the administration of the first dose of medication)
The degree of sedation was measured using the Modified Observer's Alertness/Sedation scale (MOAA/S), and bronchoscopy was performed under adequate sedation (MOAA/S≤3)
up to 30 minutes (the time to the start of the procedure after the administration of the first dose of medication)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
physician satisfaction after the procedure
Time Frame: up to 1day
Physician satisfaction with sedation was expressed as a score ranging from -5 to 5 after completion of the procedure (-5 = not satisfied at all, 5 = maximally satisfied).
up to 1day
patient satisfaction after the procedure
Time Frame: up to 1day
Patient satisfaction was measured using a visual analog scale (0 = intolerable, 10 = free from inconvenience).
up to 1day
difference between the adverse effects that occurred after bronchoscopy in the midazolam and remimazolam groups.
Time Frame: up to 30days (the first dose to the end of the procedure was defined as the time from the first sedative drug administration to mouth exit.)
adverse effects that occur during and after the procedure
up to 30days (the first dose to the end of the procedure was defined as the time from the first sedative drug administration to mouth exit.)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bronchoscopy

Clinical Trials on Midazolam

Subscribe