Efficacy of Conventional Dose Protocol vs Low Dose Protocol Albumin Use in Patients With Cirrhosis and High Risk Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

The role of Albumin in prevention and Treatment of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) in patients with Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP) who are at high risk of AKI development has been clearly defined, which decreases the morbidity and mortality. However the conventional dose recommended by the guidelines is usually not tolerated by the Indian population. Investigator propose that the low dose is as beneficial as the standard dose in patients with high risk SBP in the prevention/progression of renal dysfunction in cirrhotic patients with high risk spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. If confirmed, these results could support a significant cost reduction in the management of ascites in cirrhotic patients and decrease the side effects of the volume overload in the patient of the cirrhosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hypothesis Alternate Hypothesis: Low dose albumin is as effective as conventional dose albumin in cirrhosis with high risk SBP patients having AKI development or progression by day 4.

Aim:-To compare the efficacy and safety of low dose albumin with conventional dose albumin in AKI development or progression in patients with cirrhosis and high risk spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Study population: Patients of age > 18 years of age with cirrhosis of liver who are admitted in ward/ICU diagnosed with high risk SBP.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial Study period:1.5year Sample size: 300 (150 cases in each group) Assuming that the rate of AKI development in conventional dose albumin group - 10% and low dose albumin group 15%, Power- 80%, Alpha- 10% ONE SIDED, Non inferiority limit- 5, cases needed to enroll are 270, further assuming 10% dropout, investigator decided to enroll total 300 cases, randomly allocated with 150 cases in each arm by block randomization method with Block size of 10 Cases will be randomly allocated in 2 groups by block randomization method with block size taken as 10.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

Continuous variables- Mean +/- SD Categorical variables as percentages (%) or Frequencies Student t test will be applied in continuous data compared with two groups Survival analysis like Cox-Regression model and Kaplan-Meir plots will be plotted to find the possible factors responsible for mortality Besides these, Intent to treat (ITT) and Per Protocol (PP) will be done at the time of data analysis.

Adverse effects:

Patients receiving Albumin may experience Nausea, Vomiting, Fever with chills, dyspnea Wheezing, Volume overload, Anaphylactic reaction

Stopping rule of study:

Adverse reaction to drug Cardiopulmonary compromise

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Delhi
      • New Delhi, Delhi, India, 110070
        • Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age >18years
  2. Cirrhosis with SBP (community acquired /Health care associated/ nosocomial)
  3. High risk SBP : Patients with S Bil >4 mg/dL and/or s creat > 1 mg/dl at presentation

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Antibiotic treatment within one week before the diagnosis of SBP (except for prophylactic treatment with norfloxacin)
  2. Significant cardiac failure, pulmonary disease
  3. Known CKD or findings suggestive of organic nephropathy (proteinuria, haematuria, or abnormal findings on renal USG)
  4. Hepatocellular carcinoma
  5. HIV infection
  6. GI bleed within 1 month before the study
  7. Grade 3 to 4 hepatic encephalopathy
  8. Shock (MAP < 65)
  9. Serum creatinine level of > 3 mg/decilitre
  10. Presence of any potential causes of dehydration (such as diarrhea or an intense response to diuretic treatment within one week before the diagnosis of SBP).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High Dose Arm
Human Albumin 20% 1.5 g/kg body weight (Maximum 100g) on day 1 after the diagnosis, followed by 1 g/kg body weight (Maximum 100g)on day 3 along with standard medical therapy.
Standard Medical Treatment
A]. Patients in the conventional albumin Arm will receive Human Albumin 20% 1.5 g/kg body weight (Maximum 100g) on day 1 after the diagnosis, followed by 1 g/kg bodyweight (Maximum 100g)on day 3 along with standard medical therapy
Active Comparator: Reduced Dose Albumin+Standard Medical therapy
Human Albumin 20% 1.0 g/kg body weight (Maximum 100g) on day 1 after the diagnosis, followed by 0.5 g/kg bodyweight (Maximum 100g) on day 3 along with standard medical therapy.
Standard Medical Treatment
B]. Patients in the low dose albumin Arm will receive Human Albumin 20% 1.0 g/kg body weight (Maximum 100g) on day 1 after the diagnosis, followed by 0.5 g/kg bodyweight (Maximum 100g) on day 3 along with standard medical therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of patients developing new AKI or having progression of AKI by day 4.
Time Frame: Day 4
Day 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resolution of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis by day 5
Time Frame: Day 5
Resolution is defined as decrease in ascitic fluid PMN > 25% from baseline
Day 5
Change on Serum Ascites Albumin Gradient (SAAG) in both the groups.
Time Frame: Day 5
Day 5
Change in cell count (PMN) in both groups.
Time Frame: Day 5
Day 5
Changes in PRA levels from baseline to day 7
Time Frame: day 7
day 7
Changes in TNF-alpha levels from baseline to day 7
Time Frame: day 7
day 7
Changes in IL-6 levels from baseline to day 7
Time Frame: day 7
day 7
Changes in endotoxin levels from baseline to day 7
Time Frame: day 7
day 7
Changes in renal resistive index from baseline to day 7
Time Frame: day 7
day 7
Number of patients with development of complications in both groups
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days
Number of Participants with changes in ProBNP from baseline to day 4 or if shortness of breath occurs
Time Frame: Day 4
Day 4
Number of Participants with changes in vWF-Ag from baseline to day 4
Time Frame: Day 4
Day 4
Number of patients expired in both the groups
Time Frame: Day 7
Day 7
Number of patients expired in both the groups
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28
Number of patients expired in both the groups
Time Frame: Day 90
Day 90
Duration of hospital stay
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 5, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Cirrhosis

Clinical Trials on Standard Medical Treatment

3
Subscribe