Effectiveness and Safety of Distal Left Transradial Access in Coronary Procedures.

January 18, 2024 updated by: Naveen Seecheran, The University of The West Indies
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of distal left radial (dLR) access in coronary procedures at a tertiary center in Trinidad and Tobago.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

An observational, retrospective study will be carried out. Roughly 111 patients were registered at EWMSC and Cardiac Angiograms were done via approached through the left radial access between January 2020 and June 2021 at EWMSC. However since 2021 Cardiac Angiograms were also done via the anatomical snuff box. This study seeks to compare the results of Cardiac Angiograms vs Left Radial Access and the Anatomical Snuff box.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Central
      • Port Of Spain, North Central, Trinidad and Tobago, 00000
        • Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Caribbean decent population of Trinidad and Tobago.

Description

Cardiologist recommended guidelines.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cardiologist Assessed Conditions.
The consultant Cardiologist will decide on the various types of presentations and symptoms that will be use full in generating this study.
An observational, retrospective study will be carried out. Roughly 111 patients were registered at EWMSC and Cardiac Angiograms were done via approached through the left radial access between January 2020 and June 2021 at EWMSC. However since 2021 Cardiac Angiograms were also done via the anatomical snuff box. This study seeks to compare the results of Cardiac Angiograms vs Left Radial Access and the Anatomical Snuff box.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of snuff box access to radial access for coronary angiography in Trinidad and Tobago.
Time Frame: roughly 3 years
An observational, retrospective study will be carried out. Roughly 111 patients were registered at EWMSC and Cardiac Angiograms were done via approached through the left radial access between January 2020 and June 2021 at EWMSC. However since 2021 Cardiac Angiograms were also done via the anatomical snuff box. This study seeks to compare the results of Cardiac Angiograms vs Left Radial Access and the Anatomical Snuff box.
roughly 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CREC-SA.1304/12/2021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The principal reason for this study is to aid physicians with the necessary data to perform cardiac catherisation and to show them different access points.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on cardiac catheterization

3
Subscribe