Potassium-titanyl Phosphate (KTP) Laser vs KTP Laser and Ivermectin Cream for Facial Rosacea (KIR)

December 3, 2024 updated by: Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Comparison of the Efficacy of Potassium-titanyl Phosphate (KTP) Laser vs KTP Laser Combined With Ivermectin 1% Cream for Facial Rosacea: a Randomized Split-face Trial

Rosacea is a frequent chronic inflammatory disease affecting mainly the face but also eyes and scalp. Rosacea is classified into 3 types: erythemato-teleangiectatica, papulopustulosa and phymatosa. Treatments depend on the type and include topical and systemic antibiotics, azelaic acid, topical ivermectin, topical brimonidine, systemic isotretinoin as well as intense pulsed light (IPL) and laser therapies.

For treatment of telangiectasia and redness, laser and IPL therapies are the first choice. Vascular lasers, such as pulsed dye lasers (PDL) and potassium-titanyl phosphate (KTP) lasers as well as IPL, have demonstrated good efficacy in reduction of erythema and telangiectasias in patients with rosacea. However, these treatments are expensive and mostly not covered by the health insurance. Therefore, for patients it is important to receive the maximal effect and improvement after each single laser session.

Ivermectin is a semi-synthetic derivative of avermectin and has an anti-inflammatory effect as well as an antiparasitic effect on demodex mite. The latter is playing an important pathogenetic role in rosacea.

This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effect of KTP laser in combination with ivermectin 1% cream vs KTP laser alone in patients with facial rosacea.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Department of dermatology, University Hospital Inselspital, Bern

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fitzpatrick skin type I-IV
  • Presence of facial erythematous rosacea or mild papulopustular rosacea with permanent erythema
  • Informed consent signed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of adverse events related to KTP laser therapy
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Intention to become pregnant during the course of the study
  • History of intolerance or allergic reaction to ivermectin 1% cream or one of the ingredients
  • Ongoing treatment for skin cancer
  • Ongoing treatment with strong inhibitors of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and CYP3A4 (e.g., itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, clarithromycin, cobicistat)
  • Ongoing treatment with substances with a narrow therapeutic range whose excretion depends substantially on P-gp (e.g. digoxin, ciclosporin)
  • Inability to understand the study content

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Laser and cream
Treatment with KTP 532 nm laser. Laser fluence depends on erythema intensity and ranges from 7.0 J/cm2 to 11 J/cm2 with a 4-11 mm spot size and 8-12 ms pulse duration.
Application of ivermectin 1% cream 1x/day. Interruption for 4 days in case of irritation/redness.
Active Comparator: Laser alone
Treatment with KTP 532 nm laser. Laser fluence depends on erythema intensity and ranges from 7.0 J/cm2 to 11 J/cm2 with a 4-11 mm spot size and 8-12 ms pulse duration.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing erythema as assessed by NEI
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Any relative decrease of erythema on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone as assessed by Normalized Erythema Index (NEI), ranging from 0 to 80, with higher values indicating a worst erythema.
16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing erythema as assessed by SRI
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Any relative decrease of erythema on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone as assessed by Skin Redness Index (SRI), ranging from 1 to 4, with higher score indicating a worst erythema.
16 weeks
Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing erythema as assessed by CEA
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Any decrease of erythema on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone as assessed by Clinical Erythema Assessment (CEA), ranging from 0 to 4, with higher score indicating a worst erythema.
4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in the clinical improvement of skin lesions as assessed by PGA
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Any change of skin lesions on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone as assessed by 6-point Physician Global Assessment (PGA), ranging from 0 to 5, with higher score indicating a better outcome.
4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Patient's satisfaction related to laser and cream vs laser alone in the improvement of skin lesions as assessed by VAS
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Any difference of patient's satisfaction for the improvement of skin lesions on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone as assessed by a 9-point anchored visual analogue scale (VAS), ranging from -4 to +4, with negative scores indicating a worsening of condition, with 0 indicating no difference and with positive scores indicating an improvement.
4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing papules and papulopustules
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Any change in the number of papules and papulopustules on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone.
4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing telangiectasia severity as assessed by TGS
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Any change of telangiectasia severity on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone as assessed by telangiectasia grading scale (TGS), ranging from 0 to 3, with higher score indicating a worst telangiectasia severity.
4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing face swelling as assessed by the patient
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Any change in the number of days of face swelling on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone, as assessed by the patient
4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing face redness as assessed by the patient
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Any change in the number of days of face redness on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone, as assessed by the patient.
4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing face purpura as assessed by the patient
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Any change in the number of days of face purpura on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone, as assessed by the patient.
4, 8, 12, 16 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of observed side-effects
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Cumulative number of observed treatment side-effects.
16 weeks
Incidence of observed adverse events
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Cumulative number of observed treatment adverse events.
16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kristine Heidemeyer, MD, University Hospital Inselspital, Bern

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 12, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-D0015

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rosacea

Clinical Trials on KTP laser

Subscribe