Monolaurin Ointment Versus Mupirocin Ointment

October 15, 2023 updated by: Wenzyl Jean Etor, Victoriano Luna Medical Center

A Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial of Monolaurin Ointment Versus Mupirocin Ointment of Bacterial Skin Infections Among Pediatric Patients 5-18 Years Old in Community-Based Setting

Skin infection remains one of the leading causes of pediatric consults especially in developing countries like the Philippines. This common condition has not been considered a significant problem that could cause alarm as public health importance. Furthermore, due to the consideration that skin diseases are benign, not life-threatening, and low priority.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The advanced technology of modern science aims to formulate a new class of antibiotics due to the emergence of antibiotic resistance in microorganisms becoming a concerning threat in the medical community. Nowadays, the use of traditional medicines derived from natural plants is in increasing demand which is geared toward going back to nature as a source of medications. 17 Recently natural plants have gained popularity in society for their medical purposes, which have important therapeutic properties that can be used in the treatment of emerging and re-emerging diseases. 17,18 Pharmaceutical companies continue to do vigorous research to discover a new antimicrobial compound with a new mechanism of action for new infectious diseases and consistently tried to find solutions to the problem of multiple resistance to the existing synthetic and conventional antimicrobial agents. Therefore, more researchers and investigators direct their attention to antimicrobial of plant origin which is found to be less in adverse reactions. 5,19 Monolaurin is a type of monoacylglycerol from lauric acid. This can be produced from varieties of oil including coconut oil. Monolaurin is included on the FDA's Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) list and is widely used in food manufacturing. Coconut oil naturally contains around 40-50% lauric acid, the principal compound used to make monolaurin. Studies showed, both in vitro and in vivo that monolaurin and lauric acid are very active against pathogenic bacteria. They act through several mechanisms, namely (Dayrit, 2014) (1) destruction of lipid-coated bacterial and viral cell membranes by physicochemical processes, (2) disturbances of the signal transduction and transcription in cells, (3) stabilization of the host-cells membrane (human cells). 29 Furthermore, limited clinical trials were reported on the use of monolaurin against skin infection specifically in the pediatric population. The null hypothesis of this study is that the monolaurin ointment is equivalent to mupirocin ointment in efficacy. The objective of this study was to determine the clinical efficacy of monolaurin ointment versus mupirocin ointment in the treatment of skin infections, in a community-based setting.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • NCR
      • Quezon City, NCR, Philippines, 1110
        • V. Luna Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject aged 5 years old to 18 years old (school-aged children)
  • Subjects has infected wound (laceration, sutured wound or abrasion), impetigo and other bacterial skin infections (positive gram stain or culture)
  • Subject has total skin infection rating scale score of at least 4 including pus/exudate score of at least 1
  • Subject parent/legal guardian is willing and able to comply with protocol (see attached consent)
  • Subject parent/legal guardian has given written informed consent or assent as applicable.
  • Patient has good hygiene

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous hypersensitivity to Mupirocin
  • Secondary- infected animal/human bite or punctured wound
  • Subject has a large draining abscess
  • Chronic ulcerative lesion
  • Other underlying skin disease
  • Patient is severely malnourished
  • Systemic signs and symptoms of infection
  • Infection not to be appropriately treated with topical antibiotic
  • Infections requires surgical intervention prior to study
  • Subject received systemic antibacterial or steroid, or topical therapeutic agent within 24 hours of entry into study
  • Serious underlying medical conditions/ diseases (diabetes mellitus)
  • Other investigational drug within 30 days of study entry.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Monolaurin Ointment
treatment arm
applied thinly twice a day
Other Names:
  • Treatment Group
Active Comparator: Mupirocin Ointment
control drug
applied thinly twice a day
Other Names:
  • Control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
success or failure of therapy
Time Frame: 7 days
clinical success is determined by sufficient resolution of signs and symptoms of infection using Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS) Scoring: 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
secondary outcome measure 1
Time Frame: 7 days
decrease in wound size in mm
7 days
secondary outcome measure 2
Time Frame: 7 days
post-treatment gram stain and culture result
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Elizabeth Sanchez, MD, V. Luna Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bacterial Infections

Clinical Trials on Monolaurin

Subscribe