Parturient Satisfaction With Epidural Analgesia by PCEA or Manual Boluses

April 23, 2024 updated by: Antti Vaananen, Women's Hospital HUS

Parturient Satisfaction With Epidural Analgesia During Parturient Controlled Pump

Those prospective parturients that express that they may want an epidural labour analgesia for their delivery will be informed about the possibility to choose between a pump driven epidural or midwife administered intermittent boluses.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The purpose is to compare parturient and midwife satisfaction with the epidural labour analgesia when epidural analgesia is maintained by an epidural bolus pump (automated mandatory boluses with patient controlled boluses without background infusion) or midwife administered on-demand boluses.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Helsinki, Finland, 00029
        • HUS/Women's hospital dept of anaesthesia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Parturients coming to the delivery hospital (a tertiary delivery hospital with 8000 deliveries per year and 85 % epidural rate) for intended vaginal delivery and requesting epidural analgesia

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Admitted to the delivery hospital with the prospect of vaginal delivery
  • On admission when questioned about planned analgesia expresses that may want an epidural analgesia for the planned vaginal delivery
  • After reading the study prochure signs the participation (consent) form
  • Sufficient command of Finnish or Swedish to facilitate interview

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications for epidural analgesia
  • Planned cesarean delivery
  • Age under 18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Midwife administered boluses
The epidural analgesia is initiated by a manual bolus of the epidural solution (ropivacaine 1 mg/ml fentanyl 2.5 mug/ml) 10 + 10 ml and then continued on-demand by similar boluses until delivery
1 mg/ml
2.5 micrograms/ml
Automated and parturient controlled epidural boluses
The epidural analgesia is initiated by a manual bolus of the epidural solution (ropivacaine 1 mg/ml fentanyl 2.5 mug/ml) 10 + 10 ml and then continued by automated boluses of the same solution (6ml every 40 minutes) with possibility for the parturient to administer 6 ml extra doses with a 20 minute lock-out. Maximum hourly dose 20 ml.
1 mg/ml
2.5 micrograms/ml

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parturient satisfaction with analgesia
Time Frame: During use of labour analgesia (up to 6 hours)
Visual analog scale 0-100 mm (0=dissatisfied; 100=maximum satisfaction)
During use of labour analgesia (up to 6 hours)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Midwife satisfaction with epidural labour analgesia
Time Frame: During use of labour analgesia (up to 6 hours)
Visual analog scale 0-100 mm (0=dissatisfied; 100=maximum satisfaction)
During use of labour analgesia (up to 6 hours)
Support person's satisfaction with epidural labour analgesia
Time Frame: During use of labour analgesia (up to 6 hours)
Visual analog scale 0-100 mm (0=dissatisfied; 100=maximum satisfaction)
During use of labour analgesia (up to 6 hours)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Riina Jernman, MD PhD, Helsinki University Hospital Women's hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Anonymous data upon reasonable request with accepted study plan from an academic institution can be shared based on case-by-case assessment by the researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Labor Pain

Clinical Trials on Ropivacaine Hydrocloride

Subscribe