The Effect of Bilateral Rectus Sheath Block Versus Wound Infiltration in Gynecooncological Patients

May 23, 2024 updated by: Merve Bulun Yediyıldız, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital

The Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Rectus Sheath Block Versus Wound Infiltration on Postoperative Pain in Gynecooncological Patients Undergoing Laparotomy With Midline Incision: Randomized Controlled Triple Blinding Study

Postoperative pain is a serious problem in gynecological oncology patients who underwent median vertical incision. The aim of our study is to compare ultrasound guided bilateral rectus sheath block and local anesthetic wound infiltration application in postoperative pain control.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This single-center prospective,observational study was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee (Decision number: 2023/514/257/31, Date: 29/05/2023) and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.. Between June and September 2023, ultrasound guided bilateral rectus sheath block or local anesthesia administered to the patients in the gynecological oncology operating room of the University of Health Sciences Kartal Dr Lutfi Kırdar City Hospital at the end of the surgery. In the postoperative period, the pain level of the patients was recorded with the numerical rating scale at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours by an anesthesiologist who was unaware of the application. The data were entered into the table by an anesthesiologist who did not know which application was performed. Thus, data were recorded using a randomized triple blinding method in which the patient, the researcher, and the recording staff were blinded.

All patients underwent preoperative evaluation one day before surgery and written informed consent was obtained for participation for the study. The procedure to be performed on the patients was planned in accordance with the randomization made by the statistician. The anesthesiologist who would perform the intervention participated in the study blindly to the drugs and groups. Patients in Group I underwent postoperative ultrasound-guided bilateral rectus sheath block at the T9-10 level with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (40 ml in total). For the patients in Group II (control group), 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was applied subcutaneously to each wound lip (40 ml in total). At the end of the surgery, 100 mg tramadol iv and paracetamol 1mg/kg iv were administered to both groups as analgesics.

Pain, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable), was queried by another anesthesiologist who was blind to the procedure. 2*1 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory was routinely administered as an analgesic in the ward, but the first application time was planned by questioning the patient's pain. Rescue analgesia with tramadol was administered if the patient ranged the pain >4 . Pain was measured at the 2nd, 6th, 12th and 24th hours postoperatively, and tramadol consumption was recorded.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kartal
      • Istanbul, Kartal, Turkey
        • Kartal Dr Lutfi Kırdar City Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Between June and October 2023, 60 patients aged ASA II-III, 18-65 years old, who will undergo elective gynecooncological surgery with median incision will participate in the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • electively gynecooncological surgery patients with median incision
  • ASA II-III,
  • between 18-65 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA IV and above
  • over 65 - under 18 years of age
  • previous laparotomy
  • allergy to local anesthetics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
'rectus sheath block'
Patients in Group I underwent postoperative USG-guided bilateral rectus sheath block at the T9-10 level with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (40 ml in total).
Bupivacain administered with two different ways to the patients, postoperative pain recorded
'wound infiltration'
Group II (control group), 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was applied subcutaneously to each wound lip (40 ml in total).
Bupivacain administered with two different ways to the patients, postoperative pain recorded

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate patients' postoperative pain
Time Frame: postoperative 2,6,12,24 th hours
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of bilateral rectus sheath block and wound infiltration in gyneco-oncological patients undergoing laparatomy with midline incision. Numeric rating scale (NRS) of 1-10 used for the assessment of postoperative pain.
postoperative 2,6,12,24 th hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate patients' total analgesic consumption
Time Frame: postoperative 24 hours
The secondary aim of the study was to evaluate the patients in terms of time to total amount of opioid analgesics (mg ) consumed in 24 hours.
postoperative 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 25, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 25, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Bupivacain

Subscribe