Oriental Intervention for Enhanced Neurocognitive Health (Orient) Diet in Populations With High Risk of Stroke (ENDS)

Oriental Intervention for Enhanced Neurocognitive Health (Orient) Diet in Populations With High Risk of Stroke (ENDS): a Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled trial will enroll 160 individuals aged over 40 without dementia who are at high risk of stroke, collecting multi-modal MRI imaging, serum, and fecal samples to investigate the impact of the ORIENT diet on brain functional networks.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Oriental Intervention for Enhanced Neurocognitive Health (ORIENT) Diet in Populations with High Risk of Stroke is designed to test the impact of a 6-month intervention utilizing a culturally adapted version of the MIND diet, named as the ORIENT diet, on 160 participants (aged 40 years and above, and without dementia) with high risk of stroke (defined as having transient ischemic attack or having ≥ 3 stroke risk factors including hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, atrial fibrillation or valvular heart disease, smoking history, obvious overweight or obesity, lack of exercise, family history of stroke). The ORIENT diet retains the core components of the DASH, Mediterranean, and MIND diets, but incorporates adjustments according to evidence derived from Asian prospective cohorts and Chinese dietary practices. Participants in the intervention group will receive the ORIENT diet intervention, while participants in the control group will receive standard low-sodium and low-fat dietary advice. The study's primary objective is to assess the impact of the ORIENT diet on the brain functional networks of individual with high risk of stroke. The investigation will explore potential mediators and modifiers of the intervention's effects by collecting various cardiovascular risk factors, serum samples, fecal samples, neuropsychological assessment results, and multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging at baseline, 6 months, and 2 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310009
        • Recruiting
        • Second Affilated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged ≥ 40 years
  • High risk of stroke (with ≥ 3 of 8 stroke risk factors, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, atrial fibrillation or valvular heart disease, smoking history, obvious overweight or obesity, lack of exercise, family history of stroke, or with transient ischemic attack)
  • Written informed consent available
  • Willingness to complete all assessments and participate in follow-up
  • Adequate Visual and auditory acuity to undergo neuropsychological testing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Nuts, berries, olive oil, or fish allergies
  • previously diagnosed dementia
  • Suspected dementia after clinical assessment by study physician at screening visit
  • Previous history of major head trauma and any intracranial surgery
  • Intracranial abnormalities, such as intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage and other space occupying lesions
  • Extrapyramidal symptoms or mental illness which may affect neuropsychological measurement
  • Severe loss of vision, hearing, or communicative ability
  • Patients presenting a malignant disease with life expectancy < 3 years
  • Participation in an ongoing investigational drug study
  • Any MRI contraindications

Exit Criteria:

  • Not meet the inclusion criteria
  • For any poor adherence, not comply with the requirements of the follow-up, or safety reasons determined by investigator
  • Any adverse or serious adverse events during the study period judged by Investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Usual diet advice
The usual diet advice include recommendations in guidelines, such as reducing salt and fat intake.
Active Comparator: ORIENT diet intervention
The ORIENT diet has the same basic components of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), Mediterranean and MIND diets, but uniquely adjusting some of components according to the evidence derived from Asian prospective cohorts and the Chinese eating habits.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in brain functional network connectivity assessed by resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
Time Frame: 6 months
Primary Outcome
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Oriental Intervention for Enhanced Neurocognitive Health (ORIENT) diet scale (minimum value = 0, maximum value = 14, and higher scores mean a better outcome)
Time Frame: 6 months
short-term secondary outcome
6 months
Cognitive function change assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (minimum value = 0, maximum value = 30, and higher scores mean a better outcome)
Time Frame: 6 months
short-term secondary outcome
6 months
Changes in cerebral glymphatic function assessed by non-invasive diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space (ALPS-index)
Time Frame: 6 months
short-term secondary outcome
6 months
Changes in brain functional network efficiency assessed by resting state fMRI
Time Frame: 2 years
long-term secondary outcome
2 years
Changes in brain functional network activity intensity assessed by resting state fMRI
Time Frame: 2 years
long-term secondary outcome
2 years
Changes in brain functional network efficiency assessed by resting state fMRI
Time Frame: 5 years
long-term secondary outcome
5 years
Changes in brain functional network activity intensity assessed by resting state fMRI
Time Frame: 5 years
long-term secondary outcome
5 years
Changes in brain functional network efficiency assessed by resting state fMRI
Time Frame: 6 months
short-term secondary outcome
6 months
Changes in brain functional network activity intensity assessed by resting state fMRI
Time Frame: 6 months
short-term secondary outcome
6 months
Changes in brain functional network connectivity assessed by resting state fMRI
Time Frame: 2 years
long-term secondary outcome
2 years
Changes in brain functional network connectivity assessed by resting state fMRI
Time Frame: 5 years
long-term secondary outcome
5 years
Global cognitive function change assessed with Z-score of a modified National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Canadian Stroke Network-Canadian Stroke Network (NINDS-CSN) protocol (higher scores mean a better outcome)
Time Frame: 6 months
short-term secondary outcome
6 months
Global cognitive function change assessed with Z-score of a modified National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Canadian Stroke Network-Canadian Stroke Network (NINDS-CSN) protocol (higher scores mean a better outcome)
Time Frame: 2 years
long-term secondary outcome
2 years
Global cognitive function change assessed with Z-score of a modified National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Canadian Stroke Network-Canadian Stroke Network (NINDS-CSN) protocol (higher scores mean a better outcome)
Time Frame: 5 years
long-term secondary outcome
5 years
Cognitive domain change assessed with Z-score of a modified National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Canadian Stroke Network-Canadian Stroke Network (NINDS-CSN) protocol (higher scores mean a better outcome)
Time Frame: 6 months
short-term secondary outcome
6 months
Cognitive domain change assessed with Z-score of a modified National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Canadian Stroke Network-Canadian Stroke Network (NINDS-CSN) protocol (higher scores mean a better outcome)
Time Frame: 2 years
long-term secondary outcome
2 years
Cognitive domain change assessed with Z-score of a modified National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Canadian Stroke Network-Canadian Stroke Network (NINDS-CSN) protocol (higher scores mean a better outcome)
Time Frame: 5 years
long-term secondary outcome
5 years
Cognitive function change assessed with Mini-Mental State Examination (minimum value = 0, maximum value = 30, and higher scores mean a better outcome)
Time Frame: 6 months
short-term secondary outcome
6 months
Cognitive function change assessed with Mini-Mental State Examination (minimum value = 0, maximum value = 30, and higher scores mean a better outcome)
Time Frame: 2 years
long-term secondary outcome
2 years
Cognitive function change assessed with Mini-Mental State Examination (minimum value = 0, maximum value = 30, and higher scores mean a better outcome)
Time Frame: 5 years
long-term secondary outcome
5 years
Cognitive function change assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (minimum value = 0, maximum value = 30, and higher scores mean a better outcome)
Time Frame: 2 years
long-term secondary outcome
2 years
Cognitive function change assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (minimum value = 0, maximum value = 30, and higher scores mean a better outcome)
Time Frame: 5 years
long-term secondary outcome
5 years
Changes in white matter hyperintensity (WMH) assessed on MRI with T2-Fluid-Attenuated-Inversion-Recovery (FLAIR) sequence
Time Frame: 6 months
short-term secondary outcome
6 months
Changes in lacunes assessed on MRI with T2 FLAIR sequence
Time Frame: 6 months
short-term secondary outcome
6 months
Changes in perivascular spaces assessed on MRI with T2 FLAIR sequence
Time Frame: 6 months
short-term secondary outcome
6 months
Changes in microbleeds assessed on MRI with Susceptibility Weighted Imaging (SWI) sequence sequence
Time Frame: 6 months
short-term secondary outcome
6 months
Changes in brain atrophy (width of the sulci greater than 5mm) assessed on MRI
Time Frame: 6 months
short-term secondary outcome
6 months
Changes in white matter hyperintensity (WMH) assessed on MRI with T2 FLAIR sequence
Time Frame: 2 years
long-term secondary outcome
2 years
Changes in white matter hyperintensity (WMH) assessed on MRI with T2 FLAIR sequence
Time Frame: 5 years
long-term secondary outcome
5 years
Changes in lacunes assessed on MRI with T2 FLAIR sequence
Time Frame: 2 years
long-term secondary outcome
2 years
Changes in lacunes assessed on MRI with T2 FLAIR sequence
Time Frame: 5 years
long-term secondary outcome
5 years
Changes in perivascular spaces assessed on MRI with T2 FLAIR sequence
Time Frame: 2 years
long-term secondary outcome
2 years
Changes in perivascular spaces assessed on MRI with T2 FLAIR sequence
Time Frame: 5 years
long-term secondary outcome
5 years
Changes in microbleeds assessed on MRI with SWI sequence sequence
Time Frame: 2 years
long-term secondary outcome
2 years
Changes in microbleeds assessed on MRI with SWI sequence sequence
Time Frame: 5 years
long-term secondary outcome
5 years
Changes in brain atrophy (width of the sulci greater than 5mm) assessed on MRI
Time Frame: 2 years
long-term secondary outcome
2 years
Changes in brain atrophy (width of the sulci greater than 5mm) assessed on MRI
Time Frame: 5 years
long-term secondary outcome
5 years
Changes in cerebral glymphatic function assessed by non-invasive diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space (ALPS-index)
Time Frame: 2 years
long-term secondary outcome
2 years
Changes in cerebral glymphatic function assessed by non-invasive diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space (ALPS-index)
Time Frame: 5 years
long-term secondary outcome
5 years
Changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF) in the territory of the culprit artery assessed by arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion image
Time Frame: 6 months
short-term secondary outcome
6 months
Changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF) in the territory of the culprit artery assessed by arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion image
Time Frame: 2 years
long-term secondary outcome
2 years
Changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF) in the territory of the culprit artery assessed by arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion image
Time Frame: 5 years
long-term secondary outcome
5 years
Metabolite profiles in participants' faecal samples and serum samples
Time Frame: 6 months
short-term secondary outcome: metabolite composition was analyzed via liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
6 months
Metabolite profiles in participants' faecal samples and serum samples
Time Frame: 2 years
long-term secondary outcome: metabolite composition was analyzed via liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
2 years
Incidence of stroke event including ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke
Time Frame: 6 months
short-term secondary outcome
6 months
Incidence of stroke event including ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke
Time Frame: 2 years
long-term secondary outcome
2 years
Incidence of stroke event including ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke
Time Frame: 5 years
long-term secondary outcome
5 years
Change in the Mediterranean-DASH Diet Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) diet scale (minimum value = 0, maximum value = 15, and higher scores mean a better outcome)
Time Frame: 6 months
short-term secondary outcome
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 24, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on High Risk of Stroke

Clinical Trials on Usual Diet advice

3
Subscribe