Comparison of Three Robotic Platforms for Hysterectomy (COMPAR-HYST)

February 27, 2025 updated by: Stefano Uccella, Universita di Verona

Comparative Evaluation of Three Surgical Robotic Platforms for the Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Procedure: Post Market Clinical Follow Up Study

Hysterectomy is the most common procedure in gynaecology after a cesarean section. In recent years, the laparoscopic approach has become preferred given the different advantages over the traditional laparotomic approach, and both conventional laparoscopy and robotic-assisted laparoscopy have become the standard approach for hysterectomy. To date, robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy has been performed using one robotic platform and only recently, two new robotic platforms have been introduced in clinical practice. Although all three are registered for human use and available for clinical practice, there are currently not enough clinical experiences and data in the literature to evaluate the efficacy, safety and relationship between cost and efficacy of the new platforms available for the robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. For this reason, the investigators will conduct an exploratory clinical study on a Post Market Clinical Follow up (PMCF) medical device aimed at performing a preliminary assessment of the global performance of the ITL procedure implemented using the three robotic platforms currently available.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Verona, Italy, 37125
        • AOUI Verona - University of Verona - Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All women undergoing robotic-assisted elective total laparoscopic hysterectomy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing elective total laparoscopic hysterectomy surgery
  • Age > 18 years
  • Signature of the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing emergency surgery
  • Patients who are candidates for hysterectomy for a non-gynaecological indication
  • Patients undergoing previous radiation therapy
  • Patients unable to express adequate informed consent to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Robotic-assisted hysterectomy by da Vinci X surgical system, model IS4200 (INTUITIVE)
Women who undergo robotic-assisted hysterectomy by da Vinci X surgical system, model IS4200 (INTUITIVE)
Robotic-assisted hysterectomy following usual surgical technique
Robotic-assisted hysterectomy by VERSIUS ® surgical system (ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEM)
Women who undergo robotic-assisted hysterectomy by VERSIUS ® surgical system (ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEM)
Robotic-assisted hysterectomy following usual surgical technique
Robotic-assisted hysterectomy by HUGO ™ Robotic Assisted Surgery System (RAS) (MEDTRONIC)
Women who undergo robotic-assisted hysterectomy by HUGO ™ Robotic Assisted Surgery System (RAS) (MEDTRONIC)
Robotic-assisted hysterectomy following usual surgical technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Textbook outcome satisfaction
Time Frame: 90 days after surgery
Robotic-assisted hysterectomy performed without laparotomy conversion, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥2), the performance of postoperative imaging excluding transvaginal ultrasound, reoperation, length of stay after day of surgery >2 days, readmission within 90 days, mortality, surgery length greater than 120 minutes, or intraoperative blood loss greater than 100mL. The Textbook outcome will be considered fulfilled if all conditions are met.
90 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operative time
Time Frame: During surgery
Time between first incision and skin closure
During surgery
Intraoperative blood loss
Time Frame: During surgery
Total blood aspirate during the surgical procedure
During surgery
Intraoperative complications
Time Frame: During surgery
Intraoperative complications graded based on the Clavien-Dindo classification
During surgery
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: 30 and 90 days after surgery
Postoperative complications graded based on the Clavien-Dindo classification
30 and 90 days after surgery
Sexual function
Time Frame: 90 and 180 days after surgery
The female sexual function index (FSFI) consists of 19 multiple-choice items that assess female sexual functioning based on 6 domains: desire, arousal, orgasm, pain, sexual satisfaction, and lubrication. The total score ranges from 0 to 36, with 26.55 as the cut-off suggesting the presence of sexual dysfunction. The higher the score, the better the sexual function.
90 and 180 days after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stefano Uccella, MD, PhD, Universita di Verona
  • Principal Investigator: Simone Garzon, MD, Universita di Verona
  • Principal Investigator: Pier Carlo Zorzato, MD, Universita di Verona

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • COMPAR-HYST

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hysterectomy

Clinical Trials on Robotic-assisted hysterectomy

Subscribe