- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03662451
Single Site Versus Multi Site Robotic Hysterectomy
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study is scheduled to start November 2018 and compares robotic single site to multi site hysterectomy. Procedures are performed on two locations, Herning and Herlev Hospitals, by experienced surgeons. Patients are randomized to either R-SSH (No.=62) or R-MSH (No.=62). Patient's satisfaction with body image and cosmesis is assessed at different time points pre- and postoperatively by means of validated cosmesis scales and Body Image Questionnaire and photo-evaluations.
Postoperative pain and split times spent at the operation theatre will be registered as secondary outcome parameters.
A follow-up at 1, 3 and 6 month include evaluation of the scar and registration of port-site hernias and vaginal dehiscence or other complications. Interviews and diaries will include time of return to home and work, daily activities including sexuality The R-SSH is performed using da Vinci, Xi robotic system. One single port, diameter 2 cm is applied. Applying an additional assistant port is defined conversion of procedure R-MSH is performed using standard equipment and 4 trocars, 5 mm each.
Sample size calculation was based a previous study on fast track hysterectomy, which showed a difference in return to work of 4 days. 62 women in each group is needed with standard deviation ±8 and a power of 80%. To include those not working, the calculation was performed with an expected visual analog pain score of 0.86 ±0.2 and 62 in each group and suggested that the sample was sufficient to detect of difference of 0.1 in visual analog pain score with a power of 80%. All calculation are based on two-sided testing with alpha of 0.05.
Study Type
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Herning, Denmark, 7400
- Gynecology Dept. Herning Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Hysterectomy on benign indication,
- American Society of Anesthetists group 1 or 2,
- BMI less than 30 kg/m2
- uterine size less than 300 g estimated by ultrasound, using Ferraris formula.
Exclusion Criteria:
- adhesions
- prior extensive abdominal surgery
- prior midline incision
- cutis laxa of abdomen surgery
- endometriosis
- more than 1 cesarean section
- malignant disease
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Robotic single-site hysterectomy
Robotic single-site hysterectomy is performed in this arm
|
Periumbilical single incision vs multiple abdominal incisions for hysterectomy
|
|
Active Comparator: Robotic multi-site hysterectomy
Robotic multi-site hysterectomy is performed in this arm
|
Periumbilical single incision vs multiple abdominal incisions for hysterectomy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Scar appearance and satisfaction
Time Frame: Six months after operation
|
Appearance and evaluation of scar by POSAS scale (see www.posas.org
and reference below) which has a scale from 1-10, where 1 is minimum and 10 is maximum; on scar's pain, its itching, on difference from normal skin, on stiffness, on thickness, on irregularity and general satisfaction
|
Six months after operation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Scoring of abdominal pain
Time Frame: Visual analogue pain score at first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth month after operation
|
Visual analogue pain score with a minimum '0' and maximum '10'
|
Visual analogue pain score at first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth month after operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Finn F Lauszus, PhD, Herning Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.
- Sandberg EM, la Chapelle CF, van den Tweel MM, Schoones JW, Jansen FW. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1089-1103. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4323-y. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
- Yeung PP Jr, Bolden CR, Westreich D, Sobolewski C. Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.008.
- Fearmonti R, Bond J, Erdmann D, Levinson H. A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Eplasty. 2010 Jun 21;10:e43.
- El Hachem L, Andikyan V, Mathews S, Friedman K, Poeran J, Shieh K, Geoghegan M, Gretz HF 3rd. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):760-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
- Golkar FC, Ross SB, Sperry S, Vice M, Luberice K, Donn N, Morton C, Hernandez JM, Rosemurgy AS. Patients' perceptions of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: the cosmetic effect. Am J Surg. 2012 Nov;204(5):751-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.026.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Single site robot study
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative
-
National and Kapodistrian University of AthensCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | Postoperative Pain After Thoracic SurgeryGreece
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain Management | Postoperative Pain in Orthopaedics
-
Dr. Negrin University HospitalCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicSpain
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityCompleted
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityCompletedAcute Postoperative Pain | Chronic Postoperative PainTurkey
-
Children's National Research InstituteVentureWellRecruitingPostoperative Pain | Acute Pain | Acute Pain, PostoperativeUnited States
-
University of MalayaActive, not recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain ManagementMalaysia
-
Maimonides Medical CenterCompletedPOSTOPERATIVE PAINUnited States
-
University Hospital, AntwerpUnknown
Clinical Trials on Robotic assisted hysterectomy
-
Universita di VeronaCompleted
-
The Cleveland ClinicCompletedUterine Fibroids, Menorrhagia, EndometriosisUnited States
-
Karolinska InstitutetRecruiting
-
Medtronic - MITGActive, not recruitingCervical Cancer | Endometriosis | Ovarian Cancer | Endometrial Cancer | Uterine Prolapse | Precancerous/Nonmalignant Condition | Adenomyosis of Uterus | Menstrual Disorders | Uterine Fibroids (UF)United States
-
Seoul National University HospitalUnknownUterovaginal Prolapse | HysteropexyKorea, Republic of
-
Karlstad Central HospitalCompletedOpioid-Related DisordersSweden
-
Mayo ClinicTerminated
-
Herning HospitalWithdrawnPain | Wound | Activity, MotorDenmark
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompleted
-
Atlantic Health SystemIntuitive SurgicalCompleted