- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06138964
Comparing the Effect of siSPARC Microneedle Patch Versus siSPARC+siLR4A Microneedle Patch on Post-surgical Scars
Randomized Intra-individually Controlled Double-blinded Trial Comparing Effect of Small Interfering RNA Against SPARC (siSPARC) Microneedle Patch Versus Small Interfering RNA Against SPARC and IL4-RA (siSPARC + siLR4A) Microneedle Patch on Appearance of Post-surgical Scars
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is an 8-week, single centre double-blinded intra-individually controlled trial to compare the effect of daily application of siSPARC microneedle patch versus siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch on post-surgical scars. At least 50 subjects will be recruited for the study. After the patients have been screened for study eligibility by the study investigators or coordinators, the subjects who have understood and signed the informed consent will be enrolled in the study. Provided a subject satisfies all inclusion criteria and does not fall within exclusion criteria during the screening visit, that subject will be started on the trial during that same visit. Computer-generated randomisation will be performed to determine the randomization of patient population to the siSPARC microneedle patch or siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch. Subsequent follow-up visits would be on Day 30 and Day 60. A deviation of +/- 7 days will be accepted during the follow-up. Each study visit will last between 30-60 minutes.
Study investigators and coordinators will be performing the following assessments:
- High resolution 3D imaging: Scar elevation will be measured using the Space Spider 3D scanner, with a resolution of 0.1 mm and a blue light-emitting diode (LED) light source;
- Vancouver scar scale (VSS) score;
- Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale score from the photographs;
- Change in patient-reported levels of pain and itch using a 11-point numerical rating scale; and
- Assessment of side effects (if any). Photographic documentation: Photographic documentation will be performed at baseline and during the specified follow-up examinations. Images will be taken with standardized camera settings and standardized positioning of the subject. These images will be assessed by investigators to assess the change in scar appearance.
The siRNA microneedle patches are not commercially available. These patches have undergone testing with guinea pigs and white rabbits and were ascertained as a 'non-sensitiser' and 'non- irritant', respectively. The patches have also underwent testing to L-929 cells which are adherent cells of mouse fibroblast cell line and found to be 'non-cytotoxic'. This study involves a trial comparing treatment outcomes; there is no investigative work conducted and hence no incidental findings are not anticipated.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Hong Liang Tey
- Phone Number: 6350 6666
- Email: teyhongliang@ntu.edu.sg
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Delwyn Lim
- Phone Number: 6350 6666
- Email: delwynlim@Outlook.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Singapore, Singapore, 308205
- Recruiting
- National Skin Centre
-
Contact:
- General National Skin Centre Contact
- Phone Number: (65) 6253 4455
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult
- Age 21-75
- 2 weeks (+/- 7 days) after surgical operation with incision into the dermis
- Post-stitch removal when stitches were applied
- Wound closure/union achieved
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or lactating participant
- Participants with wound infection
- Participants assessed to be uncooperative or unable to self-administer the interventions
- Participants with known contact allergy to ingredients in the patch formulation (comprising hyaluronic acid, siRNA and glue) and/or isopropyl alcohol
- Participants who are unable to personally consent (for e.g., cognitively impaired)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: siSPARC microneedle patch
|
siSPARC microneedle patch
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch
|
siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of post-surgical scar elevation
Time Frame: 1 year
|
To compare the efficacy in reducing post-surgical scar elevation between daily application of siSPARC microneedle patch versus siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch.
This will be measured using high resolution 3D imaging: scar elevation will be measured using the Space Spider 3D scanner, with a resolution of 0.1 mm and a blue LED light source.
The lower the elevation, the better the outcome.
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score
Time Frame: 1 year
|
To evaluate the differences in VSS scores between daily application of siSPARC microneedle patch or siSPARC + siLR4A microneedle patch.
The total VSS score is based on 4 points: (1) vascularity (on a scale of 0 being normal to 3 being purple); (2) pigmentation (on a scale of 0 being normal, to 2 being hyperpigmentation); (3) pliability (on a scale of 0 being normal to 5 being contractures); and (4) height (on a scale of normal being flat to 3 being >5mm).
Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
|
1 year
|
|
Assessment of Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Assessment of SCAR Scale performed on photographs.
The SCAR Scale is based on 8 points: (1) scar spread (on a scale of 0 being none to near-invisible to 4 being severe); (2) erythema (on a scale of 0 being none to 3 being deep red or purple); (3) dyspigmentation (being either 0 absent or 1 present); (4) track or suture marks (being either 0 absent or 1 present); (5) hypertrophy or atrophy (on a scale of 0 being none to 3 being severe); (6) impression (being either 0 desirable or 1 undesirable); (7) patient reported itch in last 24 hours (being either 0 absent or 1 present); and (8) patient reported pain (being either 0 absent or 1 present).
Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
|
1 year
|
|
Patient-reported levels of pain and itch using a 11-point numerical rating scale
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Patient-reported levels of pain and itch using a 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 to 10 (0 being no pain, and 10 being the worst pain).
Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
|
1 year
|
|
Side effects
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Patient reported side effects (if any), such as contact dermatitis (if any).
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Hong Liang Tey, National Skin Centre
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2022/00942
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Wound Heal
-
Peking University Third HospitalRecruitingWound Heal | Wound Healing DelayedChina
-
Minia UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
ConvaTec Inc.Charleston Wound Care CentreCompleted
-
University of Southern California3MWithdrawnWound Heal | Wound Dehiscence
-
Danni FengNot yet recruiting
-
Melaka Manipal Medical CollegeCompleted
-
Basaksehir Cam & Sakura Şehir HospitalIstanbul Kent UniversityEnrolling by invitation
-
RWTH Aachen UniversityWithdrawn
-
Cook Biotech IncorporatedRecruitingWounds and Injuries | Surgical Wound | Wound Heal | WoundUnited Kingdom
-
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to...Recruiting
Clinical Trials on siSPARC microneedle patch
-
University of IowaCompleted
-
Emory UniversityCompleted
-
Wuhan Union Hospital, ChinaNot yet recruitingHealthy | Osteoarthritis | Osteoporosis | Osteoporosis (Senile) | Osteoarthritis (OA) of the KneeChina
-
Dhurakij Pundit UniversityActive, not recruitingEnlarged PoresThailand
-
University of Campinas, BrazilTexas Tech UniversityCompleted
-
The Catholic University of KoreaUnknown
-
Leiden University Medical CenterRecruitingCOVID-19 | Vaccination; InfectionNetherlands
-
Innoture LtdCompletedTopical AnaesthesiaUnited Kingdom
-
Emory UniversityGeorgia Institute of TechnologyCompleted