Motor Imagery in Aphantasia (OLIPHANT)

July 23, 2025 updated by: Hôpital le Vinatier

Probing and Modulating Motor Imagery Capacities in Aphantasia

The present study aims to characterize and modulate motor imagery abilities in individuals with aphantasia. The investigators will characterize the neurophysiological and physiological underpinnings of mental imagery abilities in participants with aphantasia by investigating several indices of motor imagery abilities and comparing them to participants with typical mental imagery abilities. The investigators will investigate whether non-invasive brain stimulation applied to the primary motor cortex improves mental imagery abilities in participants with aphantasia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators will recruit 20 participants with aphantasia and 20 participants with typical mental imagery capacities (no-aphantasia groups). Participants in both groups will complete a 3-hour visit for inclusion and baseline measurements (Visit 1) which will include neurophysiological, autonomic nervous system, cognitive and behavioral measures.

Participants in the aphantasia group will complete 2 additional visits to receive active and sham tDCS sessions (Visit 2 and 3), according to a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover design. Mental training will be done concurrently with tDCS using a sequential finger tapping-task (Truong et al., 2022). Participants will receive the instructions of trying to imagine themselves performing the motor task, by feeling their fingers moving as if they were actually moving it (kinesthetic modality of motor imagery).

Visits will be separated by at least 7 days.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Bron, France, 69678
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jerome Brunelin
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marine Mondino
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Frédéric Haesebaert

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • For the aphantasia group only: congenital aphantasia defined as a life-long inability to generate mental imagery (confirmed by a total score of 32 or less on the VVIQ, which is the gold standard questionnaire for aphantasia)
  • For the no-aphantasia group only: typical mental imagery capacities (confirmed by a total score of more than 32 on the VVIQ)
  • Covered by public health insurance
  • Understanding the French language
  • Signed written informed consent after being informed about the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence or history of a somatic, neurologic, or mental illness
  • Actual pain or musculoskeletal disorders at the upper limb
  • Having a regular musical activity (more than once a week) because of high manual dexterity
  • Contraindication for noninvasive brain stimulation including the presence of ferromagnetic or magnetic sensitive metal objects implanted in the head or in close proximity (e.g., brain stent, clip, cochlear implants, or stimulator)
  • Pregnancy (controlled by urine pregnancy test in females without reported contraception)
  • Active seizure disorder or history of seizures
  • Participants under curatorship/guardianship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: active stimulation group: 20 participants with aphantasia will receive a session of active HD-tDCS
Participants will receive a session of active HD-tDCS at a current intensity of 4 mA for a duration of 15min. The placement of electrodes will be determined to specifically target the primary motor cortex (4 x 1 montage with the anode over C4). During the stimulation, participants will be engaged in a mental training task (sequential finger tapping-task).
Participants will receive a session of active HD-tDCS at a current intensity of 4 mA for a duration of 15min. The placement of electrodes will be determined to specifically target the primary motor cortex (4 x 1 montage with the anode over C4). During the stimulation, participants will be engaged in a mental training task (sequential finger tapping-task).
Placebo Comparator: placebo stimulation group: 20 participants with aphantasia will receive a session of sham HD-tDCS

High-definition transcranial direct current (HD-tDCS), sham condition. Participants will receive a session of sham HD-tDCS, which will be delivered following the same procedures as active HD-tDCS but the intensity of the current will be set at 4mA during the 30 first seconds at the beginning of the 15-min period of the stimulation, and equal to 0 mA for the reminding period of stimulation to simulate the tingling sensation often experienced by individuals during active stimulation.

The placement of electrodes will be determined to specifically target the primary motor cortex (4 x 1 montage with the anode over C4). During the stimulation, participants will be engaged in a mental training task (sequential finger tapping-task).

Participants will receive a session of sham HD-tDCS, which will be delivered following the same procedures as active HD-tDCS but the intensity of the current will be set at 4mA during the 30 first seconds at the beginning of the 15-min period of the stimulation, and equal to 0 mA for the reminding period of stimulation to simulate the tingling sensation often experienced by individuals during active stimulation.

The placement of electrodes will be determined to specifically target the primary motor cortex (4 x 1 montage with the anode over C4). During the stimulation, participants will be engaged in a mental training task (sequential finger tapping-task).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gains in motor performance following mental training
Time Frame: 2 times: immediately before tDCS (baseline) and immediately after tDCS
Gains in motor performance following mental training combined with tDCS will be measured using a sequential finger tapping-task. Gains following training will be expressed as a percentage of the baseline performance.
2 times: immediately before tDCS (baseline) and immediately after tDCS

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motor corticospinal excitability at rest and during kinesthetic motor imagery
Time Frame: 1 time at baseline (Visit 1), in both groups
Motor corticospinal excitability will be assessed with single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over the primary motor cortex representation of the non-dominant hand. Using electromyography, we will measure the peak-to-peak mean amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs, measured in mV) in the contralateral first dorsal interosseous muscle both at rest and during kinesthetic motor imagery.
1 time at baseline (Visit 1), in both groups
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
Heart rate variability, including respiratory sinus arrhythmia measures, expressed in milliseconds (ms), will be assessed at rest and during kinesthetic motor imagery by recording the heart rate using three electrodes placed in the left chest area. These electrodes will be connected to the Biopac MP150 system and monitored with the Acqknowledge software
through study completion, an average of 1 month
Skin conductance
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
Amplitude of electrodermal response will be measured at rest, during actual movements and during kinesthetic motor imagery using the Biopac MP150 system with the Acqknowledge software. The ratio between amplitudes during imagined/actual movements will be computed (expressed in percent).
through study completion, an average of 1 month
Mental imagery abilities
Time Frame: 1 time at baseline, in both groups
Mental imagery abilities in different sensory modalities will be measured as scores at the following questionnaires: Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ; range 16-80)
1 time at baseline, in both groups
Mental imagery abilities
Time Frame: 1 time at baseline, in both groups
Mental imagery abilities in different sensory modalities will be measured as scores at the following questionnaires: the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ; range 20-100).
1 time at baseline, in both groups
Mental imagery abilities
Time Frame: 1 time at baseline, in both groups
Mental imagery abilities in different sensory modalities will be measured as scores at the following questionnaires: the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised (MIQ-R; range 14-98)
1 time at baseline, in both groups
Mental imagery abilities
Time Frame: 1 time at baseline, in both groups
Mental imagery abilities in different sensory modalities will be measured as scores at the following questionnaires: the Test of Ability in Movement Imagery (TAMI; range 0-24)
1 time at baseline, in both groups
Mental imagery abilities
Time Frame: 1 time at baseline, in both groups
Mental imagery abilities in different sensory modalities will be measured as scores at the following questionnaires: Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire (Psi-Q; range 0-70)
1 time at baseline, in both groups
Source monitoring performance
Time Frame: 1 time at baseline, in both groups
Source monitoring performance will be evaluated using a specific source monitoring task . Source-monitoring accuracy scores (range 0-100) will be calculated as proportions of accurate source attributions for each source
1 time at baseline, in both groups
Implicit motor imagery capacities
Time Frame: 1 time at baseline, in both groups
Implicit motor imagery capacities will be measured using a hand laterality judgment task . The percentage of correct response at the task will be calculated (range 0-100%).
1 time at baseline, in both groups
Performance of time-to-contact estimation
Time Frame: 1 time at baseline, in both groups
Performance will be measured using a specific time-to-contact (TTC) task. A TTC task involves temporal prediction in that the task requires a participant to predict the moment at which an event will occur given past sensory information (e.g., an auditory stimuli). The estimation of TTC requires determining the moment of contact (TTCa). The analysis of performance is based on BIAS quantification, which measures the average difference between individual estimation and TTCa
1 time at baseline, in both groups

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marine MONDINO, PhD, CH Le Vinatier

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 28, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aphasia

  • Teachers College, Columbia University
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia Non Fluent | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction | Aphasia, Rehabilitation
    United States
  • University of South Carolina
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Completed
    Stroke | Aphasia | Stroke, Ischemic | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia, Global | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Jargon | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (svPPA) | Nonfluent Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (nfvPPA) | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia... and other conditions
    United States
  • University of California, Berkeley
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and... and other collaborators
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Non-fluent | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia Following Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Primary Progressive Aphasia(PPA) | Logopenic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Progressive Aphasia in Alzheimer's Disease
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and...
    Active, not recruiting
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Enrolling by invitation
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia
    Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.; Universitat Pompeu Fabra
    Completed
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Wernicke | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Nonfluent
    Spain
  • Flint Rehabilitation Devices, LLC
    University of Texas
    Completed
    Broca Aphasia
    United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Recruiting
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Apraxia of Speech | PPA | Non-fluent Aphasia | Primary Progressive Non-fluent Aphasia
    United States

Clinical Trials on High-definition transcranial direct current (HD-tDCS), active condition

Subscribe