- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06162611
Etonogestrel (ENG) Implant Insertion for Emergency Contraception With Oral Levonorgestrel (LNG) vs Placebo
April 4, 2024 updated by: Lori Gawron
Generating Evidence to Improve Same-day Etonogestrel (ENG) Implant Insertion for Emergency Contraception
Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are highly effective to prevent pregnancy when used for emergency contraception (following unprotected intercourse in the last 3 days), but data are lacking for people who desire an etonogestrel (ENG) contraceptive implant in this situation.
This proposal will identify the most effective way to start an implant for emergency contraception using a randomized controlled trial comparing pregnancy risk between those receiving the implant vs. the implant plus oral emergency contraception (EC).
Data from this project will inform clinical practice and add another option, the implant, for those desiring a long acting, highly effective contraceptive method when they present for emergency contraception.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Detailed Description
Oral emergency contraception (EC), is commonly used after recent unprotected intercourse to avoid undesired pregnancy, but does not provide ongoing contraception.
Rigorous data allow for use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) as both EC and ongoing contraception, but EC efficacy data on use of the etonogestrel (ENG) implant, is lacking.
The CDC Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use support initiation of the ENG implant if oral levonorgestrel (LNG) is given concomitantly for EC.
This recommendation lacks supporting evidence and serves as a barrier to method initiation, as oral LNG is not typically available in clinics when clients desire an implant.
Additionally, oral LNG efficacy decreases in higher body mass index (BMI) users and the role of BMI on efficacy with co-administered oral LNG and the ENG implant is unknown.
As the ENG implant is also a synthetic progestogen with a rapid rise and consistent systemic levels, it could plausibly serve as stand-alone EC or increase the efficacy of oral LNG with co-administration.
Moreover, the EC mechanism of action, which is related to ovulatory suppression with oral EC, may differ if the implant is initiated with or without oral LNG, impacting efficacy in mid cycle users.
This study addresses the following research gaps around use of the ENG implant for EC that serve as barriers to provider comfort with these options: efficacy with and without oral LNG, efficacy differences by BMI, and ovulation frequency with and without oral LNG.
The investigators propose a randomized, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority study to determine if the ENG implant alone is no worse than the ENG implant + oral LNG for EC, using a 3.5% non-inferiority margin.
The investigators will include clients who present to Planned Parenthood Association of Utah clinics with report of unprotected intercourse within 72 hours who desire EC.
Eligible EC clients interested in an implant with a negative pregnancy test will be allocated 1:1 to a study group: (1) ENG implant + oral LNG or (2) ENG implant + placebo.
Our experienced research staff will follow up with participants for 4-week efficacy data as primary outcome.
Our aims include: (1) To compare the efficacy of the ENG Implant + oral LNG to the ENG Implant + placebo for EC in 790 participants assessed by pregnancy status four weeks after implant placement, (2) To compare pregnancy risk by BMI category (the investigators anticipate half of the 790 participants will have a BMI ≥25) between and within the ENG Implant + oral LNG and the ENG Implant + placebo groups, and (3) To evaluate ovulation frequency within 5 days of insertion of ENG Implant + oral LNG or ENG implant + placebo in 202 participants who are mid cycle (day 7-14 post menses) at time of enrollment assessed by serum progesterone levels and urine fertility monitor results.
Our short-term goal is to expand evidence on the efficacy of implant initiation with or without oral LNG to meet the needs of EC clients.
Our long-term goals are to develop evidence-based clinical guidelines to inform global contraceptive practices, allow for equity in long acting reversible contraception counseling at the time of EC, and support reproductive autonomy for people to achieve to their life goals.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
790
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Corinne Sexsmith, MPH
- Phone Number: 801-213-2419
- Email: corinne.sexsmith@hsc.utah.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Sarah Elliott, MPH
- Phone Number: 801-646-7066
- Email: sarah.elliott@hsc.utah.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84102
- Recruiting
- Planned Parenthood Association of Utah
-
Contact:
- Corinne Sexsmith
-
Sub-Investigator:
- David Turok, MD, MPH
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Between 18-35 years old
- Unprotected intercourse within 72 hours
- Biologically capable of pregnancy (intact uterus without prior sterilization surgery
- Fluent in English and/or Spanish
- Have a regular menstrual cycle (21-35 days)
- Known last menstrual period (+/- 3 days)
- Working (cell) phone number
- Willing to comply with the study requirements
- Willing to abstain from any CYP3A4 inducer for 5 days
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current pregnancy (+urine pregnancy test in clinic)
- Breastfeeding
- Contraindication to ENG or LNG based on CDC MEC/SPR
- Sterilization, hysterectomy, or has an IUD or contraceptive implant in place
- Vaginal bleeding of unknown etiology
- Previous use of EC in same cycle
- Allergy to LNG or ENG
- History of intolerance/ side effects with ENG Implant
- Current (past 7 days) use of any CYP3A4 inducer
- Plan to use any other steroid hormone in the next 4 weeks (testosterone, estrogen, progesterone)
- Ended a pregnancy at or under 20 weeks gestational age within last 2 weeks
- Ended a pregnancy over 20 weeks gestational age in last 6 weeks
- Use of any injectable hormonal contraceptive (Depo-Provera) in the last 15 weeks
- Use of any oral EC, contraceptive pills, patches, vaginal rings, or an IUD or Implant in the last 2 weeks
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Etonogestrel contraceptive implant with oral levonorgestrel
Patients will be randomized 1:1 to each arm and will receive the contraceptive implant with a same-day encapsulated pill with either oral levonorgestrel 1.5mg
|
Single pill of oral levonorgestrel 1.5mg X 1 dose (e.g.
Plan B) same day as contraceptive implant insertion
|
Placebo Comparator: Etonogestrel contraceptive implant with placebo
Patients will be randomized 1:1 to each arm and will receive the contraceptive implant with a same-day encapsulated pill with placebo X 1 dose
|
Single pill of placebo same day as contraceptive implant insertion
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Efficacy of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant with placebo for emergency contraception by BMI category
Time Frame: 1 month after enrollment
|
Pregnancy rate = # of pregnancies / participants in the placebo arm stratified by BMI category
|
1 month after enrollment
|
Efficacy of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant with oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception
Time Frame: 1 month after enrollment
|
Pregnancy rate = # of pregnancies / participants in the oral levonorgestrel arm
|
1 month after enrollment
|
Efficacy of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant with oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception by BMI category
Time Frame: 1 month after enrollment
|
Pregnancy rate = # of pregnancies / participants in the oral levonorgestrel arm stratified by BMI category
|
1 month after enrollment
|
Ovulation frequency within 5 days of implant insertion in the oral levonorgestrel arm
Time Frame: 5 days after implant insertion
|
Incidence of ovulation within 5 days after implant insertion measured by urine fertility monitor results and serum progesterone
|
5 days after implant insertion
|
Ovulation frequency within 5 days of implant insertion in the placebo arm
Time Frame: 5 days after implant insertion
|
Incidence of ovulation within 5 days after implant insertion measured by urine fertility monitor results and serum progesterone
|
5 days after implant insertion
|
Efficacy of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant with placebo for emergency contraception
Time Frame: 1 month after enrollment
|
Pregnancy rate = number of pregnancies / participants in the placebo arm
|
1 month after enrollment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Implant continuation
Time Frame: 4 weeks after insertion
|
Participants continuing implant use at one month as a proportion of all participants having successful placement of implant at study entry.
Measured by probabilities estimated using Kaplan-Meier approach.
|
4 weeks after insertion
|
Implant satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks after insertion
|
Likelihood of satisfaction by study group using ordinal regression.
Measured by 5-point ordinal scale (5-point ordinal scale: (1) very unsatisfied, (2) unsatisfied, (3) neutral, (4) satisfied, (5) very satisfied).
Measured by
|
4 weeks after insertion
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lori Gawron, MD, MPH, University of Utah
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 6, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 31, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2028
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 30, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
December 8, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 8, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 4, 2024
Last Verified
April 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Disease Attributes
- Emergencies
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Hormones
- Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists
- Contraceptive Agents, Hormonal
- Contraceptive Agents
- Reproductive Control Agents
- Contraceptives, Oral
- Contraceptive Agents, Female
- Contraceptives, Oral, Synthetic
- Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal
- Progestins
- Levonorgestrel
- Desogestrel
- Etonogestrel
Other Study ID Numbers
- 00152448
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Emergency Contraception
-
University of Southern CaliforniaSociety of Family PlanningCompletedContraception | Emergency ContraceptionUnited States
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompletedContraception | Reproductive Health | Emergency ContraceptionSweden
-
University of UtahActive, not recruitingContraception | IUD | Contraceptive Implant | Birth Control | Emergency ContraceptionUnited States
-
Dr. Hang Wun Raymond LiThe Family Planning Association of Hong KongCompletedEmergency ContraceptionHong Kong
-
HRA PharmaCompleted
-
HRA PharmaCompletedEmergency ContraceptionUnited States
-
HRA PharmaCompletedEmergency ContraceptionSweden, Netherlands, United Kingdom
-
HRA PharmaCompletedEmergency ContraceptionUnited States
-
University of UtahCompletedEmergency ContraceptionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Etonogestrel implant with Oral Levonorgestrel emergency contraception 1.5mg
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityNational Institutes of Health (NIH)CompletedObesityUnited States
-
Chulalongkorn UniversityCompletedBreastfeeding | Post PartumThailand
-
Emory UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsRecruitingHormonal ContraceptionUnited States
-
Lisa HaddadEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedHIV | ContraceptionUnited States
-
Eastern Virginia Medical SchoolUnited States Agency for International Development (USAID); CONRAD; Kenya Medical...CompletedContraceptive; Complications, Intrauterine | Mucosal InflammationUnited States, Kenya
-
University of PittsburghMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompletedPregnancy | Sexual Behavior | Opiate Addiction | Contraceptive BehaviorUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedPostpartumUnited States, Guatemala
-
University of PittsburghCompletedHIV | Contraception | Immune Cells (Mucosal and Systemic)United States
-
University of PittsburghUniversity of ZimbabweCompletedHIV | Contraception | Microbiota | Immune Cells (Mucosal and Systemic)Zimbabwe
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); Indiana University and other collaboratorsRecruiting