Assessment of Pain Associated With Insertion Torque and Correlation of Primary Implant Stability Measurement Methods

December 9, 2023 updated by: Mehmet Gumus Kanmaz, Ege University
The objective of this observational study is to evaluate the primary stability of dental implants and the relationship between insertion torque and patients' pain levels assessed with the visual analogue scale (VAS)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary implant stability plays a key role in providing osseointegration. Higher insertion torque indicates higher primary stability. However, the effect of increased insertion torque on patient pain levels has not been clearly demonstrated. Several methods for measuring primary stability have been defined so far. Insertion torque, periotest measurements, and resonance frequency analysis are mostly preferred due to their ease of use and non-invasiveness.

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the relationship between insertion torque and patients' pain levels assessed with the visual analogue scale (VAS) and to assess the relationship between insertion torque, periotest measurements, and resonance frequency analysis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • No contraindications for implant surgery;
  • Bilateral single-tooth loss in the posterior mandible;
  • Sufficient bone amount for implant diameter and height at the implant site;
  • At least 3 months after tooth extraction at the implant site;

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of chronic infection or pain at the implant site;
  • History of radiotherapy to the head and neck region for any reason;
  • Local or systemic causes of persistent anti-inflammatory or analgesic medication;
  • Patients with suspicion of pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: High insertion torque group
Fifteen patients (eight females and seven males) with a single-tooth deficiency bilaterally in the molar region of the lower jaw were included in the study. Implant placement with high insertion torque was planned on one side of the jaw. The implant drills were applied as recommended by the company. To achieve high insertion torque, the single-use final drill from the implant box was not used in the high torque group.
Fifteen patients with bilateral single-tooth loss in the posterior mandible will be included in the study. One implant was randomly placed with high insertion torque in each patient. A total of 15 implants will be placed, and insertion torque values will be recorded.
Active Comparator: Low insertion torque group
Fifteen patients (eight females and seven males) with a single-tooth deficiency bilaterally in the molar region of the lower jaw were included in the study. Implant placement with low insertion torque was planned on the otherside of the jaw. The implant drills were applied as recommended by the company. To achieve low insertion torque, the single-use final drill was applied two times.
Fifteen patients with bilateral single-tooth loss in the posterior mandible will be included in the study. One implant was randomly placed with low insertion torque in each patient. A total of 15 implants will be placed, and insertion torque values will be recorded.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain levels assessed with the visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 7 days
Patients will be asked to record the number of painkillers taken each day and evaluate their pain levels using a 0-10 VAS form before and after the operation. A score of 0 indicated no pain while 10 indicated the worst pain possible. A VAS score of 1-3 indicated mild pain, 4-6 indicated moderate pain, and 7-10 indicated very severe pain.
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Insertion torque values
Time Frame: 1 day
After the implant slots were prepared, the coronal part of the implants (MIS Implant Technologies, Bar Lev Industrial Park, Israel) were placed into the slots at 25 rpm without irrigation until the coronal part was at the same level with the ridge top. The maximum insertion torque was recorded while the implants were placed with the help of a physiodispenser that can measure the insertion torque (Kavo Expertsurg lux physiodispenser, KaVo Dental GmbH, Biberach, Germany).
1 day
Periotest measurements
Time Frame: 1 day
Measurements were made with the Periotest (Siemens AG, Bensheim, Germany) device and recorded as PTV (perio test value).
1 day
Resonance frequency analysis values
Time Frame: 1 day
A SmartPeg (Integration Diagnostics AB; Gothenburg, Sweden) suitable for the implant was attached to measure primary implant stability with radiofrequency. Radiofrequency analysis was performed in both mesiodistal and buccolingual directions with the Osstell Mentor (Integration Diagnostics AB; Gothenburg, Sweden) device and the measurements were recorded.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 19, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 9, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 14, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

December 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16-3.2/9

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Implantation

Clinical Trials on Dental Implantation with high torque

Subscribe