Real-life Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of EUROTEKNIKA Dental Implants

May 10, 2022 updated by: Euroteknika
Real-life evaluation of the safety and performance of EUROTEKNIKA dental implants

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Many adults have one or more missing teeth. The negative consequences of partial or total edentulousness are numerous at the level of the orofacial sphere :

  • Edentulism generates a strong aesthetic deficit due to the lack of support of the tissues and the facial musculature;
  • Edentulism causes a functional deficit that can have significant repercussions on the nutritional status of the affected subject;
  • Edentulism is accompanied by bone resorption of the jaws which is unavoidable in the absence of implant treatment;
  • In addition, the resulting feelings of discomfort and fragility are experienced as a real psychological handicap by the patient, partially or totally edentulous, which can then have significant repercussions on his social life.

EUROTEKNIKA dental implants are intended to be used for the replacement of a dental root in order to support a fixed or mobile prosthesis and thus restore masticatory function. EUROTEKNIKA dental implants are made of titanium or titanium alloy for surgical implants in accordance with ISO5832-2 and -3 standards.

EUROTEKNIKA dental implants are intended for use in cases of single, partial or complete edentulism on the maxillary and/or mandibular arch:

  • Single tooth loss,
  • Intercalary toothlessness,
  • Terminal toothlessness,
  • Total edentulism.

Dental implantology is based on the following principle: an implant is surgically inserted into the maxilla or mandible, and then a pillar is connected to this implant to support the dental prosthesis.

The use of dental implants is based on a biological process called osseointegration. Osseointegration corresponding to the fact that certain materials such as titanium are able to form direct contact with the surrounding bone. Osseointegration is therefore the direct structural and functional connection between living bone and the surface of an artificial implant. In order to allow the osseointegration process, and depending on the clinical case, a more or less long healing period must be observed before connecting the prosthetic elements to the implant. In cases of immediate loading, there is no healing period.

The expected benefits of this surgery are to improve the quality of life of patients and to recover masticatory function.

The claimed clinical performances are:

  • High primary stability,
  • High long-term implant stability,
  • Limitation of bone resorption and risks of mucositis and peri-implantitis
  • Maintenance of soft tissues.

The objectives of this study are therefore to assess the safety and performance of EUROTEKNIKA dental implants.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

868

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Clermont Ferrand, France, 63003

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who received one or more EUROTEKNIKA implants before 2017 may be included in the study for the retrospective cohort for Naturactis, Naturall+, Aesthetica+2, ORIGIN, iBone E, iBone S and iBone G implants. These patients will be included consecutively in chronological order to avoid selection bias.

A prospective cohort will also be recruited in the study, in order to meet the secondary objective concerning the improvement of the quality of life. In fact, to measure the improvement in quality of life, a questionnaire must be completed by the patient before the implant is placed. Answers to this questionnaire preoperatively cannot be collected for patients recruited retrospectively.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged 18 or over
  • Patient who has completed bone growth
  • Patient informed and agreeing to participate in the study
  • Partially or totally edentulous patient who will be implanted with the EUROTEKNIKA dental implant (for the prospective cohort)
  • Patient to benefit from the placement of an implant for the creation of a single crown (for the prospective cohort)
  • Patient implanted with the EUROTEKNIKA dental implant before 2017 (for the retrospective cohort)
  • Patient having benefited from the placement of an implant for the creation of a single crown (for the retrospective cohort)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women (for the prospective cohort)
  • Patient with bone disease in the cervico-facial region
  • Patient refusing to participate in the study
  • Patient with at least one contraindication to implantation (for the prospective cohort)
  • Patient to benefit from the placement of an implant with immediate or early loading (for the prospective cohort)
  • Patient to benefit from the placement of an implant for the support of the bridge, piles, attachment (for the prospective cohort)
  • Patient having benefited from the placement of an implant with immediate or early loading (for the retrospective cohort)
  • Patient having benefited from the placement of an implant for the support of the bridge, piles, attachment (for the retrospective cohort)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Other

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
prospective
A prospective cohort will be recruited into the study to meet the secondary objective of improving quality of life. In fact, to measure the improvement in quality of life, a questionnaire must be completed by the patient before the implant is placed. Answers to this questionnaire preoperatively cannot be collected for patients recruited retrospectively.
an implant is surgically inserted into the maxilla or mandible, and then an abutment is connected to this implant to support the dental prosthesis.
retrospective
Patients who received one or more EUROTEKNIKA implants before 2017 may be included in the study for the retrospective cohort

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The success rate of tissue integration of the implant
Time Frame: 5 years after implantation
Integration of the implant 5 years after implantation
5 years after implantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
assessment of the quality of life of patients following the recovery of full dentition with the GOHAI score (General Oral Health Assessment Index)
Time Frame: 5 years after implantation
the quality of life of patients will be evaluated with the GOHAI score before implantation and 5 years after implantation
5 years after implantation
Complication rate taking into account pain, local tenderness, infection, mobility of the implant, fracture
Time Frame: 5 years after implantation
pain, local tenderness, infection, mobility of the implant, fracture will be collected during the 5 years follow-up
5 years after implantation
measuring chewing function after prosthesis placement
Time Frame: 5 years after implantation
Occlusal assessment will be performed after implantation and at 5 years follow-up
5 years after implantation
Rate of inflammation (visual)
Time Frame: 5 years after implantation
Assessment of inflammation with visual examination 5 years after implantation
5 years after implantation
Assessment of the evolution of the péri-implant tissues
Time Frame: 5 years after implantation
assessment of the evolution of the péri-implant tissues with the Pink esthetic score
5 years after implantation
assessment of the osseointegration of the implant
Time Frame: 5 years after implantation
assessment of the osseointegration of the implant with the ISQ score
5 years after implantation
Rate of infection (x-ray)
Time Frame: 5 years after implantation
Assessment of infection with radiographic examination 5 years after implantation
5 years after implantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 25, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SUIVI IMPLANTS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Edentulous Mouth

Clinical Trials on dental implantation

3
Subscribe