- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06185985
Open-label Safety and Efficacy of SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-release Capsule) in Adults With ADHD and Mood Symptoms
A Phase IV, Open-Label, Decentralized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Qelbree® in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Mood Symptoms
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10001
- ObvioHealth
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
To be eligible for participation in this study, a participant must meet all of the following criteria:
- Is male or female, ≥18 years of age.
- Is willing and capable of providing and signing electronic informed consent.
- Has a primary diagnosis of ADHD based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR) as confirmed with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview for ADHD Studies (MINI-AS).
- Has an AISRS Total score ≥24 at Screening.
- Has a CGI-S score ≥3 at Screening.
- Has a MADRS (SIGMA) Total score >22 at Screening and/or HAM-A (SIGH-A) Total score >22 at Screening.
If potential participant is a biological female, one of the following (a, b, or c) must be met:
- Has undergone menopause, defined as a biological female who reports amenorrhea for at least 12 consecutive months prior to providing informed consent.
- Is a non-pregnant Female of Childbearing Potential (FOCP) who is not seeking fertility treatment during the study and agrees to use one of the following acceptable birth control methods beginning 14 days prior to the first dose of study medication, throughout the study while taking study medication, and for 7 days following the last dose of study medication: i. Hormonal contraceptive; ii.Barrier method: simultaneous use of male condom and diaphragm or cervical cap with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/suppository.
- Has had bilateral tubal ligation, hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy (permanently sterilized) at least 6 months prior to providing informed consent.
If potential participant is a biological male, one of the following must be met:
- Is capable of having children and agrees to use 2 methods of contraception beginning 14 days prior to the first dose of study medication, throughout the study while taking study medication, and for 7 days following the last dose of study medication.
- Has had sterilization surgery (permanently sterilized) at least 6 months prior to providing informed consent.
- Owns a functioning smartphone device, has access to an internet connection (Wi-Fi or data plan), is willing to download and use the study mobile app throughout the study, and is willing to have visual telemedicine appointments (televisits) at times designated in the study protocol.
Exclusion Criteria:
A participant who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in the study:
- Has a history of substance use disorder (alcohol, opioids, etc.) within the last 6 months prior to providing informed consent with exception of nicotine and cannabis.
- Is currently taking or has taken Qelbree for treatment of ADHD in the last 3 months or is currently taking another non-stimulant medication for treatment of ADHD, like atomoxetine (Strattera), Clonidine (Catapres, Kapvay) or Guanfacine (Tenex, Intuniv). Stimulant medications for ADHD and most medications for mood symptoms (symptoms of depression and/or anxiety) are allowed.
- Is taking a prohibited concomitant medication per the Qelbree prescribing information.
- Is a FOCP who is pregnant, nursing, sexually active with a male partner and not willing to use one of the acceptable birth control methods throughout the study and/or is seeking fertility treatment.
Has a history of moderate or severe head trauma or other neurological disorder or systemic medical disease that, in the Investigator's opinion, is likely to affect central nervous system functioning. This would include participants with:
- A current diagnosis of a major neurological disorder; or
- Seizures, seizure disorder or seizure-like events; or a history of seizure disorder within the immediate family (siblings, parents); or
- Encephalopathy
- Has attempted suicide within the 6 months prior to the C-SSRS assessment at Screening, or is at significant risk of suicide, either in the opinion of the Investigator or defined as a "yes" to suicidal ideation questions 4 or 5 or answering "yes" to suicidal behavior on the C-SSRS within the 6 months prior to the C-SSRS assessment at Screening.
- Is currently participating in another clinical trial or has participated in a clinical trial within the 60 days prior to providing informed consent.
- Has any history of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder, or has any other psychiatric disorders in the investigator's clinical judgement would interfere with their ability to participate in the study.
- Has any unstable, clinically significant cardiovascular condition that in the investigator's clinical judgement would preclude their participating in the study.
- Has any disease or taking any medication that could, in the Investigator's opinion, interfere with the assessments of safety, tolerability, or efficacy, or interfere with study conduct or interpretation of results.
- History of unexplained loss of consciousness, unexplained syncope, unexplained irregular heartbeat or palpitations or near drowning with hospital admission.
- In the Investigator's opinion, is unlikely to comply with the protocol or is unsuitable for any other reason.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Open-Label Treatment
SPN-812 (200mg to 600mg once daily) for up to 14 weeks
|
Open-label
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Total Score by Visit.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology in adults.
The AISRS consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 symptoms of ADHD per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5).
The scale is subdivided into two subscales: Inattention (IA; 9 items) and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity (HI; 9 items).
The clinician/investigator rates the subject on each item using a 4-point scale, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe.
The sum of the ratings of all 18 items yields the raw Total score (range: 0-54; the higher the Total score, the more severe the ADHD symptoms).
Post-baseline raw Total scores are converted to a change from baseline Total score.
A lower change from baseline Total Score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Inattention Subscale Score by Visit.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology in adults.
The AISRS consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 symptoms of ADHD per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5).
The scale is subdivided into two subscales: Inattention (IA; 9 items) and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity (HI; 9 items).
The clinician/investigator rates the subject on each item using a 4-point scale, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe.
The sum of the ratings of the 9 IA items yields the raw IA subscale score (range: 0-27; the higher the IA Subscale score, the more severe the IA symptoms).
Post-baseline raw Subscale score is converted to a change from baseline Subscale score.
A lower change from baseline Subscale Score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Subscale Score by Visit.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology in adults.
The AISRS consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 symptoms of ADHD per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5).
The scale is subdivided into two subscales: Inattention (IA; 9 items) and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity (HI; 9 items).
The clinician/investigator rates the subject on each item using a 4-point scale, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe.
The sum of the ratings of the 9 HI items yields the raw HI subscale score (range: 0-27; the higher the HI Subscale score, the more severe the HI symptoms).
Post-baseline raw Subscale score is converted to a change from baseline Subscale score.
A lower change from baseline Subscale Score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (v1.1) Symptoms Checklist (ASRSv1.1-SC) Total Score by Visit.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (v1.1)
Symptoms Checklist (ASRSv1.1-SC) is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess self-ratings of current ADHD symptomatology in adults.
The ASRSv1.1-SC consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 symptoms of ADHD per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5).
The scale is subdivided into two subscales: Inattention (IA; 9 items) and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity (HI; 9 items).
The subject rates the frequency of each item on a 5-point scale, where 0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, and 4=very often.
The sum of the ratings of all 18 items yields the raw Total score (range: 0-72; the higher the Total score, the more severe the ADHD symptoms).
Post-baseline raw Total scores are converted to a change from baseline Total score.
A lower change from baseline Total Score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (v1.1) Symptoms Checklist (ASRSv1.1-SC) Inattention Subscale Score by Visit.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (v1.1)
Symptoms Checklist (ASRSv1.1-SC) is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess self-ratings of current ADHD symptomatology in adults.
The ASRSv1.1-SC consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 symptoms of ADHD per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5).
The scale is subdivided into two subscales: Inattention (IA; 9 items) and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity (HI; 9 items).
The subject rates the frequency of each item on a 5-point scale, where 0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, and 3=often, and 4=very often.
The sum of the ratings of the 9 IA items yields the raw IA subscale score (range: 0-36; the higher the IA Subscale score, the more severe the IA symptoms).
Post-baseline raw Subscale score is converted to a change from baseline Subscale score.
A lower change from baseline Subscale Score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (v1.1) Symptoms Checklist (ASRSv1.1-SC) Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Subscale Score by Visit.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (v1.1)
Symptoms Checklist (ASRSv1.1-SC) is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess self-ratings of current ADHD symptomatology in adults.
The ASRSv1.1-SC consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 symptoms of ADHD per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5).
The scale is subdivided into two subscales: Inattention (IA; 9 items) and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity (HI; 9 items).
The subject rates the frequency of each item on a 5-point scale, where 0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, and 3=often, and 4=very often.
The sum of the ratings of the 9 HI items yields the raw HI subscale score (range: 0-36; the higher the HI Subscale score, the more severe the HI symptoms).
Post-baseline raw Subscale score is converted to a change from baseline Subscale score.
A lower change from baseline Subscale Score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) scale is a single item clinician-rated assessment of the severity of subject's condition (ADHD symptoms) in relation to the clinician's total experience with patients with ADHD.
The CGI-S is evaluated on a 7-point scale with 1 = Asymptomatic, no symptoms; 2 = Borderline, 3 = Mild, 4 = Moderate, 5 = Marked, 6 = Severe, and 7 = Among the most extreme (the higher the score, the more severe the symptoms).
Post-baseline (raw) CGI-S scores are converted to a change from baseline score.
A lower change from baseline CGI-S score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
The Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Score by Visit
Time Frame: Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) scale is a single item clinician-rated assessment of how much the subject's condition (ADHD) has improved, worsened or has not changed relative to his/her baseline state prior to the beginning of treatment.
The CGI-C is rated on a 7-point scale from 1 to 7, where 1 = "very much improved", 2 = "much improved", 3 = "minimally improved", 4 = "no change", 5 = "minimally worse", 6 = "much worse", and 7 = "very much worse".
A CGI-C score <4 represents a better outcome.
|
Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 14/End of Study
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a 10-item investigator-rated diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in participants with mood disorders and is designed to be sensitive to changes elicited by treatment.
A Structured Interview Guide for the MADRS (SIGMA) was developed to improve inter- and intra-rater consistency and improve reliability.
The clinician rates each of the 10 items (symptoms) on a 7-point scale [0-6 continuum, where 0=no abnormality to 6=severe].
The sum of the ratings of all 10 items yields the raw Total score (range: 0-60; the higher the Total score, the more severe the depression symptoms).
The post-baseline raw Total score is converted to a change from baseline Total score.
A lower change from baseline Total Score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire 8-item (PHQ-8) Total Score by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Patient Health Questionnaire 8-item (PHQ-8) is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression per diagnostic criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
The PHQ-8 has been validated as a diagnostic and severity measure for depressive disorders in large clinical studies.
The patient rates each item on 4-point scale (0-3), where 0 = not at all; 1 = several days; 2 = more than half the days; and 3 = nearly every day).
The sum of the ratings of all 8 items yields the raw Total score (range: 0-24; the higher the Total score, the more severe the depression symptoms).
The post-baseline raw Total score is converted to a change from baseline Total score.
A lower change from baseline Total Score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Week 14
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) is a 14-item investigator-rated scale developed to assess/measure the severity of an individual's anxiety.
The HAM-A has been used to assess severity of anxiety in children, adolescents, and adults in both clinical and research settings.
A Structured Interview Guide for the HAM-A (SIGH-A) was developed to improve inter- and intra-rater consistency and improve reliability.
The clinician rates each of the 14 items on a 5-point scale (0-4), where 0 = Not present, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe, and 4 = Very severe.
The sum of the ratings of all 14 items yields the raw Total score (range: 0-56; the higher the Total score, the more severe the symptoms of anxiety).
The post-baseline raw Total score is converted to a change from baseline Total score.
A lower change from baseline Total Score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
|
Change From Baseline in General Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Total Score by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) is a self-reported 7-item questionnaire for screening and measuring the severity of generalized anxiety disorder.
The subject rates each item on 4-point scale (0-3), where 0 = "Not at all", 1 = "Several days", 2 = "Over half the days", and 3 = "Nearly every day".
The sum of the 7 items yields a raw GAD-7 Total score (range between 0 to 21); the higher the Total score, the more severe the symptoms of anxiety.
Post-baseline raw Total scores are converted to a change from baseline Total score.
A lower change from baseline Total score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Global Executive Composite (GEC) T-score at Week 14 (End of Study)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) is a 75-item self-rating scale that assesses overall functioning (GEC) and 9 non-overlapping scales among 2 summary index scales (Metacognition Index [MI] and Behavioral Regulation Index [BRI]) that assess aspects of executive function and problems with self-regulation from the perspective of the individual.
Subjects rate each item on a 3-point scale (1=Never, 2=Sometimes, or 3=Often) based on their experience in past month.
The sum of 70 items yields the GEC raw score (range: 70-210), which is converted to a T-score (normative population mean=50 and standard deviation=10; T-score ≥ 65 is considered abnormally elevated).
The post-baseline GEC T-score is converted to a change from baseline T-score.
A lower change from baseline GEC T-score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI) T-score at Week 14 (End of Study)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) is a 75-item self-rating scale that assesses overall functioning and 9 non-overlapping scales among 2 summary index scales, the Metacognition Index (MI) and the Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI).
The BRI captures the ability to maintain appropriate regulatory control of one's own behavior and emotional responses.
Subjects rate each item on a 3-point scale (1=Never, 2=Sometimes, or 3=Often) based on their experience in past month.
The sum of 30 items yields the BRI raw score (range: 30-90), which is converted to a T-score (normative population mean=50 and standard deviation=10; T-score ≥ 65 is considered abnormally elevated).
The post-baseline BRI T-score is converted to a change from baseline T-score.
A lower change from baseline BRI T-score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Metacognition Index (MI) T-score at Week 14 (End of Study)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) is a 75-item self-rating scale that assesses overall functioning and 9 non-overlapping scales among 2 summary index scales, the Metacognition Index (MI) and the Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI).
MI reflects individual's ability to problem solve (includes initiate activity, generate ideas, sustain working memory, plan/organize approaches, monitor success/failure, and organize materials/environment).
Subjects rate each item on a 3-point scale (1=Never, 2=Sometimes, or 3=Often) based on their experience in past month.
The sum of 40 items yields the MI raw score (range: 40-120), which is converted to a T-score (normative population mean=50 and standard deviation=10; T-score ≥ 65 is considered abnormally elevated).
The post-baseline MI T-score is converted to a change from baseline T-score.
A lower change from baseline MI T-score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Absenteeism Percentage by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Questionnaire is a self-assessment questionnaire that measures the impact of health problems on work productivity and regular activities based on specific health problem (e.g., ADHD).
The WPAI:SHP consists of 6 questions that ask about the number of hours missed from work or regular activities due to the specific health problem.
The WPAI:SHP yields 4 scores: absenteeism (percentage of time absent from work), presenteeism (percentage of time impaired/unproductive at work), total work productivity impairment (absenteeism plus presenteeism), and total activity impairment (percentage of time affected outside the workplace); range 0-100%; the higher percentage, the greater the impairment).
Post-baseline percentages are converted to a change from baseline percentage.
A lower change from baseline Absenteeism percentage (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Presenteeism Percentage by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Questionnaire is a self-assessment questionnaire that measures the impact of health problems on work productivity and regular activities based on specific health problem (e.g., ADHD).
The WPAI:SHP consists of 6 questions that ask about the number of hours missed from work or regular activities due to the specific health problem.
The WPAI:SHP yields 4 scores: absenteeism (percentage of time absent from work), presenteeism (percentage of time impaired/unproductive at work), total work productivity impairment (absenteeism plus presenteeism), and total activity impairment (percentage of time affected outside the workplace); range 0-100%; the higher percentage, the greater the impairment).
Post-baseline percentages are converted to a change from baseline percentage.
A lower change from baseline Presenteeism percentage (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Regular Activity Percentage by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Questionnaire is a self-assessment questionnaire that measures the impact of health problems on work productivity and regular activities based on specific health problem (e.g., ADHD).
The WPAI:SHP consists of 6 questions that ask about the number of hours missed from work or regular activities due to the specific health problem.
The WPAI:SHP yields 4 scores: absenteeism (percentage of time absent from work), presenteeism (percentage of time impaired/unproductive at work), total work productivity impairment (absenteeism plus presenteeism), and total activity impairment (percentage of time affected outside the workplace); range 0-100%; the higher percentage, the greater the impairment).
Post-baseline percentages are converted to a change from baseline percentage.
A lower change from baseline Regular Activity percentage (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Work Productivity Percentage by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Questionnaire is a self-assessment questionnaire that measures the impact of health problems on work productivity and regular activities based on specific health problem (e.g., ADHD).
The WPAI:SHP consists of 6 questions that ask about the number of hours missed from work or regular activities due to the specific health problem.
The WPAI:SHP yields 4 scores: absenteeism (percentage of time absent from work), presenteeism (percentage of time impaired/unproductive at work), total work productivity impairment (absenteeism plus presenteeism), and total activity impairment (percentage of time affected outside the workplace); range 0-100%; the higher percentage, the greater the impairment).
Post-baseline percentages are converted to a change from baseline percentage.
A lower change from baseline Work Productivity percentage (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Global Score at Week 14 (End of Study)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a validated and effective instrument used to measure the quality and patterns of sleep in adults.
The PSQI is a self-rated, 19-item questionnaire out of which generate 7 component scores (or domains): subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction.
Each component is scored on a 4-point scale based on an individual algorithm; range: 0 to 3, whereby 0=better and 3=worse).
The sum of all 7 component scores yields the Global score (range:0 to 21); a global score >5 is associated with poor sleep quality.
A post-baseline raw Global score is converted to a change from baseline Global score.
A lower change from baseline Global score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) score by visit
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) scale is a single item clinician-rated assessment of the severity of subject's condition (ADHD symptoms) in relation to the clinician's total experience with patients with ADHD.
The CGI-S is evaluated on a 7-point scale with 1 = Asymptomatic, no symptoms; 2 = Borderline, 3 = Mild, 4 = Moderate, 5 = Marked, 6 = Severe, and 7 = Among the most extreme (the higher the score, the more severe the symptoms).
Post-baseline (raw) CGI-S scores are converted to a change from baseline score.
A lower change from baseline CGI-S score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
The Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) score by visit
Time Frame: Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) scale is a single item clinician-rated assessment of how much the subject's condition (ADHD) has improved, worsened or has not changed relative to his/her baseline state prior to the beginning of treatment.
The CGI-C is rated on a 7-point scale from 1 to 7, where 1 = "very much improved", 2 = "much improved", 3 = "minimally improved", 4 = "no change", 5 = "minimally worse", 6 = "much worse", and 7 = "very much worse".
A CGI-C score <4 represents a better outcome.
|
Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change from baseline in the Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 14/End of Study
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a 10-item investigator-rated diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in participants with mood disorders and is designed to be sensitive to changes elicited by treatment.
A Structured Interview Guide for the MADRS (SIGMA) was developed to improve inter- and intra-rater consistency and improve reliability.
The clinician rates each of the 10 items (symptoms) on a 7-point scale [0-6 continuum, where 0=no abnormality to 6=severe].
The sum of the ratings of all 10 items yields the raw Total score (range: 0-60; the higher the Total score, the more severe the depression symptoms).
The post-baseline raw Total score is converted to a change from baseline Total score.
A lower change from baseline Total Score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
|
Change from baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire 8-item (PHQ-8) Total Score by visit
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Patient Health Questionnaire 8-item (PHQ-8) is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression per diagnostic criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
The PHQ-8 has been validated as a diagnostic and severity measure for depressive disorders in large clinical studies.
The patient rates each item on 4-point scale (0-3), where 0 = not at all; 1 = several days; 2 = more than half the days; and 3 = nearly every day).
The sum of the ratings of all 8 items yields the raw Total score (range: 0-24; the higher the Total score, the more severe the depression symptoms).
The post-baseline raw Total score is converted to a change from baseline Total score.
A lower change from baseline Total Score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change from baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Week 14
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) is a 14-item investigator-rated scale developed to assess/measure the severity of an individual's anxiety.
The HAM-A has been used to assess severity of anxiety in children, adolescents, and adults in both clinical and research settings.
A Structured Interview Guide for the HAM-A (SIGH-A) was developed to improve inter- and intra-rater consistency and improve reliability.
The clinician rates each of the 14 items on a 5-point scale (0-4), where 0 = Not present, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe, and 4 = Very severe.
The sum of the ratings of all 14 items yields the raw Total score (range: 0-56; the higher the Total score, the more severe the symptoms of anxiety).
The post-baseline raw Total score is converted to a change from baseline Total score.
A lower change from baseline Total Score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
|
Change from baseline in General Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Total Score by visit
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) is a self-reported 7-item questionnaire for screening and measuring the severity of generalized anxiety disorder.
The subject rates each item on 4-point scale (0-3), where 0 = "Not at all", 1 = "Several days", 2 = "Over half the days", and 3 = "Nearly every day".
The sum of the 7 items yields a raw GAD-7 Total score (range between 0 to 21); the higher the Total score, the more severe the symptoms of anxiety.
Post-baseline raw Total scores are converted to a change from baseline Total score.
A lower change from baseline Total score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change from baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Global Executive Composite (GEC) T-score at Week 14 (End of Study)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) is a 75-item self-rating scale that assesses overall functioning (GEC) and 9 non-overlapping scales among 2 summary index scales (Metacognition Index [MI] and Behavioral Regulation Index [BRI]) that assess aspects of executive function and problems with self-regulation from the perspective of the individual.
Subjects rate each item on a 3-point scale (1=Never, 2=Sometimes, or 3=Often) based on their experience in past month.
The sum of 70 items yields the GEC raw score (range: 70-210), which is converted to a T-score (normative population mean=50 and standard deviation=10; T-score ≥ 65 is considered abnormally elevated).
The post-baseline GEC T-score is converted to a change from baseline T-score.
A lower change from baseline GEC T-score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
|
Change from baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI) T-score at Week 14 (End of Study)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) is a 75-item self-rating scale that assesses overall functioning and 9 non-overlapping scales among 2 summary index scales, the Metacognition Index (MI) and the Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI).
The BRI captures the ability to maintain appropriate regulatory control of one's own behavior and emotional responses.
Subjects rate each item on a 3-point scale (1=Never, 2=Sometimes, or 3=Often) based on their experience in past month.
The sum of 30 items yields the BRI raw score (range: 30-90), which is converted to a T-score (normative population mean=50 and standard deviation=10; T-score ≥ 65 is considered abnormally elevated).
The post-baseline BRI T-score is converted to a change from baseline T-score.
A lower change from baseline BRI T-score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
|
Change from baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Metacognition Index (MI) T-score at Week 14 (End of Study)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) is a 75-item self-rating scale that assesses overall functioning and 9 non-overlapping scales among 2 summary index scales, the Metacognition Index (MI) and the Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI).
MI reflects individual's ability to problem solve (includes initiate activity, generate ideas, sustain working memory, plan/organize approaches, monitor success/failure, and organize materials/environment).
Subjects rate each item on a 3-point scale (1=Never, 2=Sometimes, or 3=Often) based on their experience in past month.
The sum of 40 items yields the MI raw score (range: 40-120), which is converted to a T-score (normative population mean=50 and standard deviation=10; T-score ≥ 65 is considered abnormally elevated).
The post-baseline MI T-score is converted to a change from baseline T-score.
A lower change from baseline MI T-score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
|
Change from baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Absenteeism percentage by visit
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Questionnaire is a self-assessment questionnaire that measures the impact of health problems on work productivity and regular activities based on specific health problem (e.g., ADHD).
The WPAI:SHP consists of 6 questions that ask about the number of hours missed from work or regular activities due to the specific health problem.
The WPAI:SHP yields 4 scores: absenteeism (percentage of time absent from work), presenteeism (percentage of time impaired/unproductive at work), total work productivity impairment (absenteeism plus presenteeism), and total activity impairment (percentage of time affected outside the workplace); range 0-100%; the higher percentage, the greater the impairment).
Post-baseline percentages are converted to a change from baseline percentage.
A lower change from baseline Absenteeism percentage (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change from baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP Presenteeism percentage by visit
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Questionnaire is a self-assessment questionnaire that measures the impact of health problems on work productivity and regular activities based on specific health problem (e.g., ADHD).
The WPAI:SHP consists of 6 questions that ask about the number of hours missed from work or regular activities due to the specific health problem.
The WPAI:SHP yields 4 scores: absenteeism (percentage of time absent from work), presenteeism (percentage of time impaired/unproductive at work), total work productivity impairment (absenteeism plus presenteeism), and total activity impairment (percentage of time affected outside the workplace); range 0-100%; the higher percentage, the greater the impairment).
Post-baseline percentages are converted to a change from baseline percentage.
A lower change from baseline Presenteeism percentage (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change from baseline in the Change from baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Work Productivity percentage by visit
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Questionnaire is a self-assessment questionnaire that measures the impact of health problems on work productivity and regular activities based on specific health problem (e.g., ADHD).
The WPAI:SHP consists of 6 questions that ask about the number of hours missed from work or regular activities due to the specific health problem.
The WPAI:SHP yields 4 scores: absenteeism (percentage of time absent from work), presenteeism (percentage of time impaired/unproductive at work), total work productivity impairment (absenteeism plus presenteeism), and total activity impairment (percentage of time affected outside the workplace); range 0-100%; the higher percentage, the greater the impairment).
Post-baseline percentages are converted to a change from baseline percentage.
A lower change from baseline Work Productivity percentage (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change from baseline in the Change from baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Regular Activity percentage by visit
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Questionnaire is a self-assessment questionnaire that measures the impact of health problems on work productivity and regular activities based on specific health problem (e.g., ADHD).
The WPAI:SHP consists of 6 questions that ask about the number of hours missed from work or regular activities due to the specific health problem.
The WPAI:SHP yields 4 scores: absenteeism (percentage of time absent from work), presenteeism (percentage of time impaired/unproductive at work), total work productivity impairment (absenteeism plus presenteeism), and total activity impairment (percentage of time affected outside the workplace); range 0-100%; the higher percentage, the greater the impairment).
Post-baseline percentages are converted to a change from baseline percentage.
A lower change from baseline Regular Activity percentage (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change from baseline in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Global score at Week 14 (End of Study)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a validated and effective instrument used to measure the quality and patterns of sleep in adults.
The PSQI is a self-rated, 19-item questionnaire out of which generate 7 component scores (or domains): subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction.
Each component is scored on a 4-point scale based on an individual algorithm; range: 0 to 3, whereby 0=better and 3=worse).
The sum of all 7 component scores yields the Global score (range:0 to 21); a global score >5 is associated with poor sleep quality.
A post-baseline raw Global score is converted to a change from baseline Global score.
A lower change from baseline Global score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
|
Change from baseline in Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (v1.1) Symptoms Checklist (ASRSv1.1-SC) Total score by visit.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (v1.1)
Symptoms Checklist (ASRSv1.1-SC) is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess self-ratings of current ADHD symptomatology in adults.
The ASRSv1.1-SC consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 symptoms of ADHD per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5).
The scale is subdivided into two subscales: Inattention (IA; 9 items) and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity (HI; 9 items).
The subject rates the frequency of each item on a 5-point scale, where 0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, and 4=very often.
The sum of the ratings of all 18 items yields the raw Total score (range: 0-72; the higher the Total score, the more severe the ADHD symptoms).
Post-baseline raw Total scores are converted to a change from baseline Total score.
A lower change from baseline Total Score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change from baseline in the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (v1.1) Symptoms Checklist (ASRSv1.1-SC) Inattention Subscale score by visit.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (v1.1)
Symptoms Checklist (ASRSv1.1-SC) is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess self-ratings of current ADHD symptomatology in adults.
The ASRSv1.1-SC consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 symptoms of ADHD per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5).
The scale is subdivided into two subscales: Inattention (IA; 9 items) and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity (HI; 9 items).
The subject rates the frequency of each item on a 5-point scale, where 0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, and 3=often, and 4=very often.
The sum of the ratings of the 9 IA items yields the raw IA subscale score (range: 0-36; the higher the IA Subscale score, the more severe the IA symptoms).
Post-baseline raw Subscale score is converted to a change from baseline Subscale score.
A lower change from baseline Subscale Score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
|
Change from baseline in the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (v1.1) Symptoms Checklist (ASRSv1.1-SC) Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Subscale score by visit.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
The Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (v1.1)
Symptoms Checklist (ASRSv1.1-SC) is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess self-ratings of current ADHD symptomatology in adults.
The ASRSv1.1-SC consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 symptoms of ADHD per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5).
The scale is subdivided into two subscales: Inattention (IA; 9 items) and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity (HI; 9 items).
The subject rates the frequency of each item on a 5-point scale, where 0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, and 3=often, and 4=very often.
The sum of the ratings of the 9 HI items yields the raw HI subscale score (range: 0-36; the higher the HI Subscale score, the more severe the HI symptoms).
Post-baseline raw Subscale score is converted to a change from baseline Subscale score.
A lower change from baseline Subscale Score (<0) represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline and Week 4, 9, and 14
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Joseph T, Hull, PhD, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Mental Disorders
- Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders
- Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Adrenergic Agents
- Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors
- Antidepressive Agents
- Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors
- Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation
- Viloxazine
Other Study ID Numbers
- 812P413
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
-
King's College LondonActive, not recruitingAttention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder | Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder SymptomsUnited Kingdom
-
Cingulate TherapeuticsSuspendedPhase 3 Efficacy and Safety Laboratory Classroom Study in Pediatrics (6-12) With ADHD Using CTx-1301ADHD | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder | Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity | ADHD - Combined Type | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Combined | Attention Deficit Hyper Activity | Attention-deficit HyperactivityUnited States
-
Ornit CohenUnknownAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder | Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity | Attention Deficit Disorder | Attention Deficit Disorders With Hyperactivity | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisordersIsrael
-
Cingulate TherapeuticsPremier Research Group plcCompletedADHD | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder | ADHD - Combined Type | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Combined | Attention Deficit Hyper Activity | Attention-deficit HyperactivityUnited States
-
Qbtech ABEnrolling by invitationAttention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity (ADHD) | Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD)United States
-
University of Texas at AustinRecruitingAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderUnited States
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); Louisiana State University Health...Recruiting
-
Tongren Hongxin Kangxin Traditional Chinese Medicine...CompletedAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChina
-
Aytu BioPharma, Inc.Premier Research Group plcWithdrawnAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderUnited States
-
Universidade do Sul de Santa CatarinaAssociação Brasileira de Cannabis MedicinalRecruitingAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)Brazil
Clinical Trials on SPN-812
-
Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)United States
-
Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Completed
-
Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Completed
-
Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Completed
-
Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Completed
-
Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.RecruitingAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity DisorderUnited States
-
Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)United States, Puerto Rico
-
University Hospital, GenevaUniversity of Lausanne HospitalsCompletedImpact of SPN on Infection Rate, Duration of Mechanical Ventilation & Rehabilitation in ICU PatientsCritically IllSwitzerland
-
Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.RecruitingFocal Onset SeizuresUnited States