- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06200012
Multi-Level Stigma Intervention for Mental Health Services
Multi-Level Stigma Intervention to Improve Access to Substance Use Care With Prescribing Providers in Mental Health Settings
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Substance use is commonly stigmatized, even in health settings. Stigma toward people who use drugs (PWUD) arises from multiple sources, including policies and individuals who carry out policies ("structural stigma") and health professionals ("provider-based stigma"). This study seeks to answer the question of whether addressing organizational-level structural stigma toward PWUD enhances the behavioral effects of stigma training among professionals providing mental health (MH) services.
This study will have two intervention groups: A MH clinic where the providers receive only the educational intervention and a MH clinic where the providers receive both the educational intervention and an organizational policy change. The investigators hypothesize that providers at a MH site implementing an organizational policy change in addition to providing professional training will demonstrate greater improvement to health services for PWUD compared to a site where providers receive training alone.
Only a small body of research develops and evaluates interventions seeking to reduce structural and provider-based stigma toward PWUD in healthcare settings or investigates the impact of such interventions on provision of evidence-based interventions like substance use disorder (SUD) pharmacotherapy. Little is known about substance use stigma in MH settings in particular, although some research suggests psychiatrist stigma toward dual diagnosis patients is greater than toward patients with either a SUD or MH diagnosis alone. Extant studies on stigma toward PWUD in healthcare found educational interventions incorporating critical reflection techniques and contact with PWUD significantly reduced provider-based stigma. But most provider-based stigma intervention studies have two major weaknesses: 1) failing to address structural drivers of stigma, such as organizational policies motivating attitudes and behaviors, and 2) falling short of practical application because they largely focus on professional attitudes without measuring changes to service provision. The investigators propose to pilot test a multi-level stigma intervention that leverages what existing research suggests works in professional stigma education, and adds a novel component of organizational policy change within a MH clinic. Because so little research exists on organizational-level stigma interventions, the investigators will use an inductive approach to identify a promising feasible policy that may reduce stigma toward PWUD. Our pilot testing will assess the extent to which combining interventions that modify structural/organizational and individual/professional-level drivers of stigma in outpatient MH services may improve not only attitudes but also health service provision to PWUD.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New Mexico
-
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87106
- LifeStance Health
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Individuals must meet all of the inclusion criteria in order to be eligible to participate in the study.
Site inclusion:
- The sites will be selected using convenience sampling.
- The inclusion criterion will be sites with at least 4 providers.
Provider inclusion:
- Providers at participating sites will also be recruited using convenience sampling.
- Any psychiatrists or psychiatric NPs are eligible to participate as long as they are employed at the participating LSH site.
Patient EHR inclusion:
- All new patients entering mental health services during the 3-months prior and 3- months after the intervention will be included in the EHR data sample to assess whether substance use was addressed during their first visit and subsequent 3-month retention in care.
- Existing and new patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD)/opioid use disorder (OUD) will be identified through the EHR to assess pharmacotherapy initiation.
Patient survey inclusion:
- Half of the survey sample (n=20) will include patients without a substance use disorder (SUD) documented in their chart at the time of data collection
- The other half of the survey sample (n=20) will include patients who do have an ICD-10 code for SUD in their chart.
- Patient stratification rationale: the intention is to compare experiences and perceptions of stigma among patients who have SUD noted in their EHR and those who do not. This is also to assess stigma among patients who may not have their substance use addressed during a MH visit but who have substance use related health risks and substance use disorders (assessed through the ASSIST questionnaire).
Exclusion Criteria:
All individuals meeting any of the exclusion criteria will be excluded from study participation.
Provider exclusion:
- Providers may be excluded if they were not employed by LSH and seeing patients for the past three months at the time of enrollment.
Patient exclusion:
- Patients may be excluded from the SUD-stratified portion of the survey sample if their SUD diagnosis is only for a tobacco use disorder.
- Patients may also be excluded if they are unable or unwilling to give written informed consent.
- Patients who are currently in jail, prison or other overnight facility as required by court of law or have pending legal action that could prevent participation in study activities will also be excluded.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Control arm: educational training only
This arm received only an educational training for mental health professionals about substance use-related stigma
|
A professional training targeting known attitudinal and knowledge drivers of substance use stigma
|
Experimental: Experimental arm: educational training plus a policy change for controlled substance agreements
This arm received both 1) an educational training for mental health professionals about substance use-related stigma; and 2) a policy change that replaced the standard LifeStance Health system's "controlled substance agreement" (CSA) with a new agreement integrating principles of shared decision-making and offering prescribers a communication tool with suggestions for how to implement principles of shared decision-making and patient centered care in their use of the new CSA
|
Pairing a professional training targeting known attitudinal and knowledge drivers of substance use stigma with a policy altering potentially stigmatizing features of controlled substance agreements.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of patients where substance use was addressed during a MH visit among new intakes and documented in EHR
Time Frame: 3-months prior to intervention vs. 3-months after intervention
|
Identified ICD-10s or notes among participating providers in electronic health records (EHR)
|
3-months prior to intervention vs. 3-months after intervention
|
Number of patients in the provider panel (new or old) diagnosed with OUD or AUD who initiated OUD or AUD pharmacotherapy
Time Frame: 3-months prior to intervention vs. 3-months after intervention
|
Whether pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorders (OUD) or alcohol use disorders (AUD) was initiated for patients with ICD-10s for OUD or AUD, as indicated in electronic health records (EHR)
|
3-months prior to intervention vs. 3-months after intervention
|
Three-month retention in MH services for new patients whose EHR indicate substance use or SUD
Time Frame: 3-months prior to intervention vs. 3-months after intervention
|
Measured as any return visit for mental health (MH) services, as documented in electronic health records (EHR) for patients with ICD-10s for substance use disorders (SUD) or any indication of substance use in provider notes
|
3-months prior to intervention vs. 3-months after intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Training intervention feasibility
Time Frame: up to 14 days after training
|
Assessed among professionals in training using Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) in post-training surveys
|
up to 14 days after training
|
Training intervention acceptability
Time Frame: up to 14 days after training
|
Assessed among professionals in training using Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) in post-training surveys
|
up to 14 days after training
|
Training intervention appropriateness
Time Frame: up to 14 days after training
|
Assessed among professionals in training using Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) in post-training surveys
|
up to 14 days after training
|
Professional Stigma measured with Social Distance Scale (SDS)
Time Frame: up to 14 days before training, up to 14 days after training, and 6-weeks after training
|
Measures willingness to have several kinds of social relationships among professionals in training, and adapted for three populations: relationships with people who actively use drugs, with people who used to use drugs, and with people treated with opioid agonist treatment.
Assessed in longitudinal surveys (within 14 days pre-training, within 14 days post-training, and 6-weeks post-training).
Lower score indicates greater stigma, min=12 and max=60.
|
up to 14 days before training, up to 14 days after training, and 6-weeks after training
|
Professional Stigma measured with Medical Condition Regard Scale (MCRS)
Time Frame: up to 14 days before training, up to 14 days after training, and 6-weeks after training
|
Measures endorsed provider-based stigma toward patients with a specific diagnosis among professionals in training.
Assessed in longitudinal surveys (within 14 days pre-training, within 14 days post-training, and 6-weeks post-training).
Lower score indicates greater stigma, min=7 and max=35.
|
up to 14 days before training, up to 14 days after training, and 6-weeks after training
|
Professional Stigma measured with Perceived Dangerousness Scale
Time Frame: up to 14 days before training, up to 14 days after training, and 6-weeks after training
|
Measures perceptions of the dangerousness of a stigmatized group among professionals in training.
Assessed in longitudinal surveys (within 14 days pre-training, within 14 days post-training, and 6-weeks post-training).
Lower score indicates greater stigma, min=5 and max=25.
|
up to 14 days before training, up to 14 days after training, and 6-weeks after training
|
Patient-reported stigma measured with Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Inventory (ISMI)
Time Frame: 6-week post-training survey
|
This measure is for patients and includes questions about anticipated stigma and internalized/self-stigma.
This will be asked of a stratified random sample of patients of participating providers (n=20 with a SUD and n=20 not diagnosed with an SUD).
Lower score indicates less stigma, min=29 and max=116.
|
6-week post-training survey
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- UG1DA049468 CTN-00137
- UG1DA049468 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Substance Use Disorders
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)RecruitingSubstance Use Disorder | Cocaine Use DisorderUnited States
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)RecruitingSubstance Use | Substance Use Disorders | Cannabis Use | Alcohol Use, UnspecifiedUnited States
-
Woebot HealthNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Stanford UniversityCompletedSubstance Use Disorders | Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)United States
-
University of MichiganNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)RecruitingSubstance Use | Substance Use Disorders | Substance DependenceUnited States
-
Woebot HealthStanford UniversityCompletedSubstance Use Disorders | Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)United States
-
Emory UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Georgia Institute of Technology; CUNYCompletedSubstance-Related Disorders | Substance Abuse, Intravenous | Substance Use Disorders | Opioid Use | Substance Abuse | Opioid-use Disorder | Opioid Use Disorder, Severe | Substance WithdrawalUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)RecruitingSubstance Use | Opioid Use | Drug Use | Substance MisuseUnited States
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of Missouri, St. LouisCompletedSubstance Use Disorders | Alcohol Use DisorderCanada
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedSubstance Use | Substance Use Disorders | Substance AbuseTurkey
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedPTSD | Alcohol Use Disorders | Substance Use DisordersUnited States
Clinical Trials on Single-level stigma reduction intervention: educational training
-
University of California, Los AngelesChiangmai Rajabhat UniversityRecruitingHIV Infections | Stigma, Social | Care Eliciting BehaviorThailand
-
University of MinnesotaCompletedHIV Infections | Hiv | AIDSUnited States
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Comprehensive International Program of Research on AIDSWithdrawn
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
University of TorontoCompletedSocial StigmaLesotho, Swaziland
-
George Mason UniversityRecruitingHiv | Mental Health Issue | Support, FamilyUnited States
-
Kathmandu University School of Medical SciencesCompletedCervical Cancer | Screening | StigmaNepal
-
Duke UniversityRTI International; Muhimbili University of Health and Allied SciencesActive, not recruitingHIV | Depressive Symptoms | Self Efficacy | Stigma, Social | Self Esteem | HopeTanzania
-
University of PennsylvaniaNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Completed
-
Mansoura UniversityUniversity of PittsburghSuspendedSchizophrenia | Stigma, SocialEgypt