Efficacy Testing of a Culturally Relevant Stigma Intervention With WLWH in Tanzania

November 28, 2023 updated by: Duke University

Efficacy Testing of a Culturally Relevant Stigma Intervention With Women Living With HIV in Tanzania

This study will test a stigma reduction intervention with women living with HIV in Tanzania.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will test a culturally and linguistically relevant stigma reduction intervention, Labda Siku Moja, among women living with HIV in Tanzania.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
        • Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

The inclusion criteria for this study are:

  • (1) women who are living with HIV;
  • (2) age 18 (age of adulthood as defined by the Tanzanian government);
  • (3) able and willing to voluntarily consent to participate in the study;
  • (4) able to travel to a data collection in their local community (as described above);
  • (5) demonstrate mental competence at time of informed consent;
  • (6) verbally indicate that they plan to reside in their current community for at least 6 months after enrollment (necessary to prevent attrition);
  • (7) score at the median or higher level on the Swahili Version of the Multidimensional Measure of Internalized HIV Stigma Scale.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) any acute psychological or physiological distress; if there is evidence of acute psychologic and/or physiologic, they will be excluded from this study and referred to an appropriate site for evaluation and treatment.
  • (2) Transgender women living with HIV will not be eligible to participate in this study to reduce the potential for confounding sources of stigma recognizing that a transgender identity is highly stigmatized and culturally sensitive in Tanzania. Further, it would be exceedingly difficult to recruit a sufficient sample of transgender women living with HIV to conduct an appropriate analysis.
  • (3) Participants may be enrolled in other HIV-related studies except cognitive-behavioral intervention studies addressing stigma, self-efficacy, self-esteem, and/or disclosure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Treatment as Usual Group
This group will receive treatment as usual which means that no formal stigma reduction intervention will be provided. At the end of the follow-up period, this group will be invited to view the Labda Siku Moja stigma reduction intervention without follow-up.
Experimental: Stigma Intervention Group
This group will participate in a 5 week intervention. Each week, intervention group participants will watch one ethnodrama segment of the Labda Siku Moja stigma reduction intervention followed by a guided debrief using motivational interviewing.
The Labda Siku Moja stigma reduction intervention is a tailored stigma reduction intervention for women living with HIV in Tanzania. It is comprised of five ethnodramas (video stories) culturally and linguistically relevant to the Tanzanian women living with HIV.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of participants recruited as measured by enrollment logs
Time Frame: up to 6 months
up to 6 months
Number of study participants retained in study as measured by enrollment logs
Time Frame: up to 180 days
up to 180 days
Percent of questions left blank on study instruments
Time Frame: up to 180 days
up to 180 days
Number of women who completed all 5 sessions
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks after enrollment
up to 10 weeks after enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in internalized stigma, as measured by the Swahili version of the Multidimensional Measure of Internalized Stigma Scale
Time Frame: baseline and 30, 90, and 180 days after intervention
Scores range from 0 to 100 with lower scores indicating less stigma and higher scores indicating more stigma
baseline and 30, 90, and 180 days after intervention
change in coping self-efficacy, as measured by the Swahili version of the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: baseline and 30, 90, and 180 days after intervention
Scores range from 0 to 26, with lower scores indicating lower coping self-efficacy and higher scores indicating greater coping self-efficacy.
baseline and 30, 90, and 180 days after intervention
change in self-esteem, as measured by the Swahili version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
Time Frame: baseline and 30, 90, and 180 days after intervention
Scores range from 10 to 40, with lower scores indicating lower self-esteem and higher scores indicating higher self-esteem
baseline and 30, 90, and 180 days after intervention
change in hope, as measured by the Swahili version of the State of Hope Scale
Time Frame: baseline and 30, 90, and 180 days after intervention
Scores range from 6 to 24, with lower scores indicating less hope and higher scores indicating more hope
baseline and 30, 90, and 180 days after intervention
change in depressive symptoms, as measured by the Swahili version of the Patient Health Questionnaire 9
Time Frame: baseline and 30, 90, and 180 days after intervention
Scores range from 0 to 27, with lower scores indicating less depressive symptoms and higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms
baseline and 30, 90, and 180 days after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael V. Relf, PhD, Duke University School of Nursing

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 24, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro00109278

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

Clinical Trials on Labda Siku Moja stigma reduction intervention

3
Subscribe