- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06203405
The Efficacy of P0.1-guided Sedation Protocol in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Objective: to assess the efficacy of sedation protocol targeting optimal respiratory drive using P0.1 and RASS score compared with conventional sedation strategy (targeting RASS score alone) in patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the medical intensive care unit
The main questions it aims to answer are:
• Will titration of sedation targeting optimal respiratory drive assessed by P0.1 and arousal level improve outcomes in patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the medical ICU?
Study protocol Mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the medical ICU will be screened daily by the investigators. If the patients meet the eligibility criteria, they will be informed about the study protocol and potential risks and undergo informed consent. Then patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio and allocated to each study group (intervention and control group).
- After allocation, patients will be monitored for arousal level using RASS score and respiratory drive by P0.1 measured automatically from mechanical ventilators during the study period.
- Sedation and neuromuscular blocking agents used will be adjusted according to the group to which patients are allocated.
- Intervention group: Adjustment of sedation and neuromuscular blocking agents to achieve the target of light sedation (RASS 0 to -2) and optimal P0.1 (1.5 to 3.5 cmH2O) for 48 hours
- Control group: Adjustment of sedation to achieve the target of light sedation (RASS 0 to -2) alone for 48 hours
Researchers will compare the outcomes (rate of successful extubation, ICU and hospital mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, amount and duration of sedation used during the study period) between the above sedation protocol (interventional group) and conventional sedation strategy (control group)
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Natdanai Ketdao, MD
- Phone Number: +66880684998
- Email: natdke@kku.ac.th
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Tanuwong Viarasilpa, MD
- Phone Number: +66813469400
- Email: tanuwong.via@mahidol.ac.th
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
- Recruiting
- Siriraj Hospital
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Ranistha Ratanarat, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Adhiratha Boonyasiri, MD
-
Contact:
- Natdanai Ketdao, MD
- Phone Number: +66880684998
- Email: natdke@kku.ac.th
-
Contact:
- Tanuwong Viarasilpa, MD
- Phone Number: +66813469400
- Email: tanuwong.via@mahidol.ac.th
-
Principal Investigator:
- Tanuwong Viarasilpa, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Natdanai Ketdao, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Chairat Permpikul, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Surat Tongyoo, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Akekarin Poompichet, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Panuwat Promsin, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Thummaporn Naorungroj, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Preecha Thomrongpairoj, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Chailat Maluangnon, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Nattapat Wongtirawit, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Nualnapa Kasemvilawan, RN
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Metanee Promlungka, RN
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit at Department of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital
- Age ≥18 years old
- Receiving mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory failure within 72 hours before enrollment (including patients receiving mechanical ventilation before ICU admission)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients receiving mechanical ventilation due to indications other than acute respiratory failure, such as postoperative procedures or airway protection in comatose patients
- Patients receiving mechanical ventilation for >72 hours before enrollment
- Patients receiving neuromuscular blocking agents prior to randomization
- Patients with impaired secretion clearance or upper airway obstruction anticipating a tracheostomy
- Patients with severe metabolic acidosis (arterial pH <7.2) who do not have a plan for renal replacement therapy
- Patients intubated for neurological conditions, including intracranial hypertension, intracranial hemorrhage, large cerebral infarction, status epilepticus, or neuromuscular diseases
- Post-cardiac arrest patients
- Patients with severe liver dysfunction, including acute fulminant liver failure or cirrhosis with the Child-Pugh score B or C
- Patients who have a previous allergy to any of the opioid, sedation, or neuromuscular blocking drugs
- Pregnancy
- Patients with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders or decisions to withhold life-sustaining treatments
- Patients who refuse to participate in the study or cannot identify legally authorized representatives (LAR) within 24 hours after enrollment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Titrating sedation targeting both optimal P0.1 and appropriate arousal level
• Sedative drug adjustment to achieve the target of light sedation (RASS 0 to -2) and optimal respiratory drive measured by P0.1 of 1.5 - 3.5 cmH2O
|
Continuous intravenous infusion of fentanyl 25-75 micrograms/hour
Continuous intravenous infusion of midazolam 0.02 - 0.1 milligrams/kilogram/hour
Continuous intravenous infusion of propofol 5 - 50 micrograms/kilogram/minute
Continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.2 - 0.7 micrograms/kilogram/hour
Continuous intravenous infusion of cisatracurium 5 - 20 milligrams/hour
|
|
No Intervention: Titrating sedation targeting appropriate arousal level alone
• Sedative drug adjustment to achieve the target of light sedation (RASS 0 to -2) according to the standard clinical practice guidelines for managing pain and agitation for patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the ICU.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Successful extubation within 14 days after randomization
Time Frame: 14 days after randomization
|
Successful extubation within 14 days without reintubation within 28 days after ICU admission
|
14 days after randomization
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Successful extubation within 7 days after randomization
Time Frame: 7 days after randomization
|
Successful extubation within 7 days without reintubation within 28 days after ICU admission
|
7 days after randomization
|
|
Successful extubation within 28 days after randomization
Time Frame: 28 days after randomization
|
Successful extubation without reintubation within 28 days after ICU admission
|
28 days after randomization
|
|
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: From date of intubation until the date of last successful extubation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
Time from intubation to the last successful extubation
|
From date of intubation until the date of last successful extubation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
|
Ventilator-free days to day 28 after randomization
Time Frame: 28 days after randomization
|
Number of days alive without mechanical ventilation
|
28 days after randomization
|
|
Reintubation rate at 7 days after randomization
Time Frame: 7 days after randomization
|
Number of reintubation within 7 days after randomization
|
7 days after randomization
|
|
Self extubation rate at 7 days after extubation
Time Frame: 7 days after randomization
|
Number of self extubation (accidentally extubation without physician's order) within 7 days after randomization
|
7 days after randomization
|
|
Post-extubation respiratory failure
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of the first event of post-extubation respiratory failure or date of death from any cause or ICU discharge, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
Patients who meet at least one of the following criteria within 72 hours after extubation: respiratory rate more than 35 breaths/minute, oxygen saturation less than 90% or PaO2 less than 80 mmHg despite receiving FiO2 >50%, respiratory acidosis with pH <7.35 or PaCO2 >50 mmHg or increase of 20% from baseline.
|
From date of randomization until the date of the first event of post-extubation respiratory failure or date of death from any cause or ICU discharge, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
|
Tracheostomy
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of tracheostomy or date of death from any cause or ICU discharge, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
Number of tracheostomy performed
|
From date of randomization until the date of tracheostomy or date of death from any cause or ICU discharge, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
|
Lung injury score on day 3 after randomization
Time Frame: 3 days after randomization
|
Lung injury score on day 3 after randomization
|
3 days after randomization
|
|
Lung injury score on day 7 after randomization
Time Frame: 7 days after randomization
|
Lung injury score on day 7 after randomization
|
7 days after randomization
|
|
PaO2/FiO2 ratio on day 3 after randomization
Time Frame: 3 days after randomization
|
PaO2/FiO2 ratio on day 3 after randomization
|
3 days after randomization
|
|
PaO2/FiO2 ratio on day 7 after randomization
Time Frame: 7 days after randomization
|
PaO2/FiO2 ratio on day 7 after randomization
|
7 days after randomization
|
|
Rates of new diagnosis of ARDS according to the new Berlin criteria after randomization
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of new onset ARDS diagnosis after randomization or date of death from any cause or ICU discharge, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
Number of ARDS diagnoses after randomization
|
From date of randomization until the date of new onset ARDS diagnosis after randomization or date of death from any cause or ICU discharge, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
|
Delirium during ICU admission
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of diagnosis of delirium diagnosis or date of death from any cause or ICU discharge, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
Delirium assessed by positive CAM-ICU criteria during ICU admission
|
From date of randomization until the date of diagnosis of delirium diagnosis or date of death from any cause or ICU discharge, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
|
Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at hospital discharge
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of hospital discharge or date of death from any cause , whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
Functional status assessed by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at hospital discharge
|
From date of randomization until the date of hospital discharge or date of death from any cause , whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
|
ICU all-cause mortality
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of ICU discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
All-cause mortality during ICU admission
|
From date of randomization until the date of ICU discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
|
Hospital all-cause mortality
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of hospital discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
All-cause mortality during hospital admission
|
From date of randomization until the date of hospital discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
|
28-day mortality after randomization
Time Frame: 28 days after randomization
|
All-cause mortality during 28-day after randomization
|
28 days after randomization
|
|
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of ICU discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
Time from ICU admission to ICU discharge
|
From date of randomization until the date of ICU discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
|
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of hospital discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
Time from hospital admission to hospital discharge
|
From date of randomization until the date of hospital discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
|
Maximum infusion dose (per hour) of sedation
Time Frame: From date of sedation initiation until the date of sedation discontinuation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
Maximum infusion dose (per hour) of sedation used during the study period
|
From date of sedation initiation until the date of sedation discontinuation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
|
Duration (days) of sedation
Time Frame: From date of sedation initiation until the date of sedation discontinuation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
Duration (days) of sedation used during the study period
|
From date of sedation initiation until the date of sedation discontinuation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
|
Ventilator-associated pneumonia
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of first diagnosed ventilator-associated pneumonia or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
Number of ventilator-associated pneumonia diagnosed after randomization
|
From date of randomization until the date of first diagnosed ventilator-associated pneumonia or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
|
Barotrauma
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented barotrauma or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
Number of barotrauma (pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema) occurred after randomization
|
From date of randomization until the date of first documented barotrauma or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
|
Serious adverse events
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented serious adverse events or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
Number of serious adverse events (severe allergic reaction or anaphylaxis and propofol infusion syndrome defined as severe lactic acidosis and hypertriglyceridemia) occurred after randomization
|
From date of randomization until the date of first documented serious adverse events or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
|
Cardiac arrhythmia
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented cardiac arrhythmia events or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
Number of cardiac arrhythmia events occurred after randomization
|
From date of randomization until the date of first documented cardiac arrhythmia events or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
|
Maximum infusion dose (per hour) of vasopressor
Time Frame: From date of vasopressor initiation until the date of vasopressor discontinuation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
Maximum infusion dose (per hour) of vasopressor used during the study period
|
From date of vasopressor initiation until the date of vasopressor discontinuation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
|
Duration (days) of vasopressor
Time Frame: From date of vasopressor initiation until the date of vasopressor discontinuation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
Duration (days) of vasopressor used during the study period
|
From date of vasopressor initiation until the date of vasopressor discontinuation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 28 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Tanuwong Viarasilpa, MD, Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
- Principal Investigator: Natdanai Ketdao, MD, Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gelinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJC, Pandharipande PP, Watson PL, Weinhouse GL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Balas MC, van den Boogaard M, Bosma KJ, Brummel NE, Chanques G, Denehy L, Drouot X, Fraser GL, Harris JE, Joffe AM, Kho ME, Kress JP, Lanphere JA, McKinley S, Neufeld KJ, Pisani MA, Payen JF, Pun BT, Puntillo KA, Riker RR, Robinson BRH, Shehabi Y, Szumita PM, Winkelman C, Centofanti JE, Price C, Nikayin S, Misak CJ, Flood PD, Kiedrowski K, Alhazzani W. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):e825-e873. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.
- Brochard L, Slutsky A, Pesenti A. Mechanical Ventilation to Minimize Progression of Lung Injury in Acute Respiratory Failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb 15;195(4):438-442. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201605-1081CP.
- Marra A, Ely EW, Pandharipande PP, Patel MB. The ABCDEF Bundle in Critical Care. Crit Care Clin. 2017 Apr;33(2):225-243. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2016.12.005.
- Boles JM, Bion J, Connors A, Herridge M, Marsh B, Melot C, Pearl R, Silverman H, Stanchina M, Vieillard-Baron A, Welte T. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J. 2007 May;29(5):1033-56. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00010206.
- Papazian L, Klompas M, Luyt CE. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):888-906. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05980-0. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
- Chanques G, Constantin JM, Devlin JW, Ely EW, Fraser GL, Gelinas C, Girard TD, Guerin C, Jabaudon M, Jaber S, Mehta S, Langer T, Murray MJ, Pandharipande P, Patel B, Payen JF, Puntillo K, Rochwerg B, Shehabi Y, Strom T, Olsen HT, Kress JP. Analgesia and sedation in patients with ARDS. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2342-2356. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06307-9. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
- Murray JF, Matthay MA, Luce JM, Flick MR. An expanded definition of the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988 Sep;138(3):720-3. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/138.3.720. No abstract available. Erratum In: Am Rev Respir Dis 1989 Apr;139(4):1065.
- Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, Ely EW, Gelinas C, Dasta JF, Davidson JE, Devlin JW, Kress JP, Joffe AM, Coursin DB, Herr DL, Tung A, Robinson BR, Fontaine DK, Ramsay MA, Riker RR, Sessler CN, Pun B, Skrobik Y, Jaeschke R; American College of Critical Care Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):263-306. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72.
- Klompas M, Branson R, Cawcutt K, Crist M, Eichenwald EC, Greene LR, Lee G, Maragakis LL, Powell K, Priebe GP, Speck K, Yokoe DS, Berenholtz SM. Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia, ventilator-associated events, and nonventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Jun;43(6):687-713. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.88. Epub 2022 May 20.
- Lee CH, Peng MJ, Wu CL. Dexamethasone to prevent postextubation airway obstruction in adults: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Crit Care. 2007;11(4):R72. doi: 10.1186/cc5957.
- Writing Group for the PReVENT Investigators; Simonis FD, Serpa Neto A, Binnekade JM, Braber A, Bruin KCM, Determann RM, Goekoop GJ, Heidt J, Horn J, Innemee G, de Jonge E, Juffermans NP, Spronk PE, Steuten LM, Tuinman PR, de Wilde RBP, Vriends M, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ. Effect of a Low vs Intermediate Tidal Volume Strategy on Ventilator-Free Days in Intensive Care Unit Patients Without ARDS: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Nov 13;320(18):1872-1880. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14280.
- Spinelli E, Mauri T, Beitler JR, Pesenti A, Brodie D. Respiratory drive in the acute respiratory distress syndrome: pathophysiology, monitoring, and therapeutic interventions. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Apr;46(4):606-618. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05942-6. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute PETAL Clinical Trials Network; Moss M, Huang DT, Brower RG, Ferguson ND, Ginde AA, Gong MN, Grissom CK, Gundel S, Hayden D, Hite RD, Hou PC, Hough CL, Iwashyna TJ, Khan A, Liu KD, Talmor D, Thompson BT, Ulysse CA, Yealy DM, Angus DC. Early Neuromuscular Blockade in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2019 May 23;380(21):1997-2008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901686. Epub 2019 May 19.
- Grasselli G, Calfee CS, Camporota L, Poole D, Amato MBP, Antonelli M, Arabi YM, Baroncelli F, Beitler JR, Bellani G, Bellingan G, Blackwood B, Bos LDJ, Brochard L, Brodie D, Burns KEA, Combes A, D'Arrigo S, De Backer D, Demoule A, Einav S, Fan E, Ferguson ND, Frat JP, Gattinoni L, Guerin C, Herridge MS, Hodgson C, Hough CL, Jaber S, Juffermans NP, Karagiannidis C, Kesecioglu J, Kwizera A, Laffey JG, Mancebo J, Matthay MA, McAuley DF, Mercat A, Meyer NJ, Moss M, Munshi L, Myatra SN, Ng Gong M, Papazian L, Patel BK, Pellegrini M, Perner A, Pesenti A, Piquilloud L, Qiu H, Ranieri MV, Riviello E, Slutsky AS, Stapleton RD, Summers C, Thompson TB, Valente Barbas CS, Villar J, Ware LB, Weiss B, Zampieri FG, Azoulay E, Cecconi M; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Taskforce on ARDS. ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies. Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jul;49(7):727-759. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07050-7. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
- Sklienka P, Frelich M, Bursa F. Patient Self-Inflicted Lung Injury-A Narrative Review of Pathophysiology, Early Recognition, and Management Options. J Pers Med. 2023 Mar 28;13(4):593. doi: 10.3390/jpm13040593.
- Carteaux G, Parfait M, Combet M, Haudebourg AF, Tuffet S, Mekontso Dessap A. Patient-Self Inflicted Lung Injury: A Practical Review. J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 21;10(12):2738. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122738.
- Spinelli E, Pesenti A, Slobod D, Fornari C, Fumagalli R, Grasselli G, Volta CA, Foti G, Navalesi P, Knafelj R, Pelosi P, Mancebo J, Brochard L, Mauri T. Clinical risk factors for increased respiratory drive in intubated hypoxemic patients. Crit Care. 2023 Apr 11;27(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04402-z.
- Goligher EC, Jonkman AH, Dianti J, Vaporidi K, Beitler JR, Patel BK, Yoshida T, Jaber S, Dres M, Mauri T, Bellani G, Demoule A, Brochard L, Heunks L. Clinical strategies for implementing lung and diaphragm-protective ventilation: avoiding insufficient and excessive effort. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2314-2326. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06288-9. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
- Dzierba AL, Khalil AM, Derry KL, Madahar P, Beitler JR. Discordance Between Respiratory Drive and Sedation Depth in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2021 Dec 1;49(12):2090-2101. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005113.
- Wongtangman K, Grabitz SD, Hammer M, Wachtendorf LJ, Xu X, Schaefer MS, Fassbender P, Santer P, Kassis EB, Talmor D, Eikermann M; SICU Optimal Mobilization Team (SOMT) Group. Optimal Sedation in Patients Who Receive Neuromuscular Blocking Agent Infusions for Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome-A Retrospective Cohort Study From a New England Health Care Network. Crit Care Med. 2021 Jul 1;49(7):1137-1148. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004951.
- Jackson DL, Proudfoot CW, Cann KF, Walsh TS. The incidence of sub-optimal sedation in the ICU: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2009;13(6):R204. doi: 10.1186/cc8212. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
- Kassis EB, Beitler JR, Talmor D. Lung-protective sedation: moving toward a new paradigm of precision sedation. Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jan;49(1):91-94. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06901-z. Epub 2022 Oct 14. No abstract available.
- Bertoni M, Spadaro S, Goligher EC. Monitoring Patient Respiratory Effort During Mechanical Ventilation: Lung and Diaphragm-Protective Ventilation. Crit Care. 2020 Mar 24;24(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2777-y.
- Rittayamai N, Beloncle F, Goligher EC, Chen L, Mancebo J, Richard JM, Brochard L. Effect of inspiratory synchronization during pressure-controlled ventilation on lung distension and inspiratory effort. Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Oct 6;7(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0324-z.
- Telias I, Junhasavasdikul D, Rittayamai N, Piquilloud L, Chen L, Ferguson ND, Goligher EC, Brochard L. Airway Occlusion Pressure As an Estimate of Respiratory Drive and Inspiratory Effort during Assisted Ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 May 1;201(9):1086-1098. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201907-1425OC.
- Beloncle F, Piquilloud L, Olivier PY, Vuillermoz A, Yvin E, Mercat A, Richard JC. Accuracy of P0.1 measurements performed by ICU ventilators: a bench study. Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Sep 13;9(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0576-x.
- de Vries HJ, Tuinman PR, Jonkman AH, Liu L, Qiu H, Girbes ARJ, Zhang Y, de Man AME, de Grooth HJ, Heunks L. Performance of Noninvasive Airway Occlusion Maneuvers to Assess Lung Stress and Diaphragm Effort in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients. Anesthesiology. 2023 Mar 1;138(3):274-288. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004467.
- Brenner M, Mukai DS, Russell JE, Spiritus EM, Wilson AF. A new method for measurement of airway occlusion pressure. Chest. 1990 Aug;98(2):421-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.98.2.421.
- Seo Y, Lee HJ, Ha EJ, Ha TS. 2021 KSCCM clinical practice guidelines for pain, agitation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disturbance in the intensive care unit. Acute Crit Care. 2022 Feb;37(1):1-25. doi: 10.4266/acc.2022.00094. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
- Tongyoo S, Tantibundit P, Daorattanachai K, Viarasilpa T, Permpikul C, Udompanturak S. High-flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. noninvasive mechanical ventilation to prevent reintubation in sepsis: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Sep 14;11(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00922-5.
- Sandhu RS, Pasquale MD, Miller K, Wasser TE. Measurement of endotracheal tube cuff leak to predict postextubation stridor and need for reintubation. J Am Coll Surg. 2000 Jun;190(6):682-7. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00269-6.
- Fan T, Wang G, Mao B, Xiong Z, Zhang Y, Liu X, Wang L, Yang S. Prophylactic administration of parenteral steroids for preventing airway complications after extubation in adults: meta-analysis of randomised placebo controlled trials. BMJ. 2008 Oct 20;337:a1841. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1841.
- Pluijms WA, van Mook WN, Wittekamp BH, Bergmans DC. Postextubation laryngeal edema and stridor resulting in respiratory failure in critically ill adult patients: updated review. Crit Care. 2015 Sep 23;19(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1018-2.
- Singh A, Anjankar AP. Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome: A Clinical Review. Cureus. 2022 Oct 17;14(10):e30383. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30383. eCollection 2022 Oct.
- Matthay MA, Arabi Y, Arroliga AC, Bernard G, Bersten AD, Brochard LJ, Calfee CS, Combes A, Daniel BM, Ferguson ND, Gong MN, Gotts JE, Herridge MS, Laffey JG, Liu KD, Machado FR, Martin TR, McAuley DF, Mercat A, Moss M, Mularski RA, Pesenti A, Qiu H, Ramakrishnan N, Ranieri VM, Riviello ED, Rubin E, Slutsky AS, Thompson BT, Twagirumugabe T, Ware LB, Wick KD. A New Global Definition of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan 1;209(1):37-47. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202303-0558WS.
- Cheng KC, Hou CC, Huang HC, Lin SC, Zhang H. Intravenous injection of methylprednisolone reduces the incidence of postextubation stridor in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1345-50. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000214678.92134.BD.
- Hernandez G, Vaquero C, Colinas L, Cuena R, Gonzalez P, Canabal A, Sanchez S, Rodriguez ML, Villasclaras A, Fernandez R. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation and Postextubation Respiratory Failure in High-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1565-1574. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14194.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Wounds and Injuries
- Pathologic Processes
- Disease Attributes
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Lung Diseases
- Respiration Disorders
- Infant, Premature, Diseases
- Infant, Newborn, Diseases
- Thoracic Injuries
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
- Respiratory Insufficiency
- Critical Illness
- Lung Injury
- Acute Lung Injury
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Anesthetics
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Sensory System Agents
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
- Analgesics
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Narcotics
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Adjuvants, Anesthesia
- Hypnotics and Sedatives
- Anti-Anxiety Agents
- Tranquilizing Agents
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Anesthetics, Intravenous
- Anesthetics, General
- GABA Modulators
- GABA Agents
- Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists
- Adrenergic alpha-Agonists
- Adrenergic Agonists
- Adrenergic Agents
- Neuromuscular Agents
- Neuromuscular Blocking Agents
- Midazolam
- Dexmedetomidine
- Propofol
- Fentanyl
- Cisatracurium
Other Study ID Numbers
- SI915/2023
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Critical Illness
-
Duke UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Not yet recruitingDecision Making | Neonatal Critical Illness | Pediatric Critical IllnessUnited States
-
Duke UniversityNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); National Institutes...CompletedNeonatal Critical Illness | Pediatric Critical IllnessUnited States
-
Istituto Clinico HumanitasRecruitingCritical Illness Myopathy | Critical Illness Polyneuropathy | Critical Illness PolyneuromyopathyItaly
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisEuropean Society of Intensive Care Medicine; French Society for Intensive Care and other collaboratorsRecruitingCritical Illness | Intensive Care Patients | Critical Illness Requiring Intensive Care - Sepsis | Critical Illness Requiring Intensive Care - Acute Brain Injury | Critical Illness Requiring Intensive Care - Major Surgery | Critical Illness Requiring Intensive Care - PolytraumaFrance
-
Boston Children's HospitalCompleted
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)RecruitingCritical Illness | Illness, CriticalUnited States
-
Karolinska InstitutetNot yet recruitingPediatric Critical IllnessSweden
-
Sándor BeniczkyUniversity of Aarhus; Danish Council for Independent Research; Søster og Verner...CompletedCritical Illness Myopathy | Myopathy Critical IllnessDenmark
-
McMaster UniversityLondon Health Sciences Centre; McMaster Children's Hospital; Canadian Critical...CompletedPediatric Critical IllnessCanada
-
University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustCompletedRehabilitation After Critical Illness