Real-time Pressure Volume Loop Monitoring as a Guide for Enhanced Understanding of Changes in Elemental Cardiovascular Physiology During Therapeutic Strategies Aiming for Hemodynamic Optimization. Cohort II: Structural Heart Interventions (PLUTO-II) (PLUTO-II)

January 3, 2024 updated by: Nicolas van Mieghem, Erasmus Medical Center
The aim of PLUTO-II is to use biventricular pressure-volume (PV) loop measurements to improve the understanding of direct changes in cardiac and hemodynamic physiology induced by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or tricuspid edge-to-edge repair (TEER). These procedures evoke immediate changes in cardiac mechanoenergetics, ventricular-vascular interaction as well as ventricular (in)dependency. Within the context of PLUTO-II, patients will undergo biventricular PV-loop measurements before and after TAVI or TEER. In future, the application of perprocedural PV loop monitoring may tailor the daily individual decision making process during structural interventions in the catheterization laboratory.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pressure-Volume (PV) loop monitoring is a tool allowing direct visualization of individual cardiac and hemodynamic physiology, including parameters reflecting cardiac mechanoenergetics (a derivative of the myocardial metabolic demand) as well as the ventricular-arterial coupling. The concepts of changing biventricular cardiac and hemodynamic physiology induced by structural heart interventions, including Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI), Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Repair (mitral TEER) and Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Tricuspid Repair (tricuspid TEER) are largely based on hypotheses, computer simulations and non-invasive (echocardiographic) estimations. PVL monitoring has the potential to identify unique characteristics of TAVI, mitral TEER and tricuspid TEER from the perspective of changing baseline cardiovascular physiology, including (a change in) interference between both ventricles (i.e. the ventricular crosstalk). Perprocedural (biventricular) PV loop monitoring can be of direct clinical relevance by appreciating the ventricular tolerance of increased cardiac afterload induced by the particular intervention in individual patients. In future, real-time PV loop analysis can be adjunctive to the individual decision-making process during routine structural interventions.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

157

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Zuid-Holland
      • Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 3015GD
        • Recruiting
        • Erasmus Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nicolas M Van Mieghem, Prof MD PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients undergoing elective TAVI or mitral TEER.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Adult patients undergoing elective Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) or Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge repair (TEER).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed or suspected (concomitant) congenital heart disease.
  • Mechanical circulatory support (including Impella, PulseCath, Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation) was used during the procedure aiming to improve native cardiac output.
  • No (written) informed consent was obtained.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cohort A: Transaortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)
Elective TAVI with biventricular PV loop monitoring (throughout the procedure)
Pressure volume (PV) loop measurement using a conductance catheter
Cohort B: Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (mitral TEER)
Elective mitral TEER with biventricular PV loop monitoring (throughout the procedure)
Pressure volume (PV) loop measurement using a conductance catheter
Cohort C: Tricuspid Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (tricuspid TEER)
Elective tricuspid TEER with biventricular PV loop monitoring (throughout the procedure)
Pressure volume (PV) loop measurement using a conductance catheter

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiac mechanoenergetics
Time Frame: Periprocedural time window
The change in cardiac mechanoenergetics (stroke work, potential energy and pressure-volume area in mmHg/mL) induced by the particular procedure
Periprocedural time window

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stroke volume (mL)
Time Frame: Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
Based on perprocedural conductance catheter measurements
Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
Preload recruitable stroke work (mmHg/mL)
Time Frame: Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
Based on perprocedural conductance catheter measurements
Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
Tau (ms)
Time Frame: Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
Based on perprocedural conductance catheter measurements
Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
Intraventricular dyssynchrony (%)
Time Frame: Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
Based on perprocedural conductance catheter measurements
Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
dP/dt min and dP/dt max (mmHg/sec)
Time Frame: Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
Based on perprocedural conductance catheter measurements
Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
End-systolic elastance (Ees) and arterial elastance (Ea) (mmHg/mL)
Time Frame: Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
With Ees/Ea ratio reflecting ventricular-vascular coupling
Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
End-systolic and end-diastolic volume (mL)
Time Frame: Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
Based on perprocedural conductance catheter measurements
Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
End-systolic and end-diastolic pressure (mmHg)
Time Frame: Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
Based on perprocedural conductance catheter measurements
Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
Starling Contractile Index (mmHg/mL)
Time Frame: Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
Based on perprocedural conductance catheter measurements
Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
V0, V15, V30 and V100 mmHg (mL)
Time Frame: Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
Based on perprocedural conductance catheter measurements
Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
SW/PVA ratio (based on the primary outcome)
Time Frame: Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
Based on perprocedural conductance catheter measurements
Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
Beta (ventricular stiffness constant, unitless)
Time Frame: Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
Based on perprocedural conductance catheter measurements
Periprocedural change (directly before vs. after the procedure)
Mortality
Time Frame: 30-day follow-up
All-cause
30-day follow-up
Hospital stay
Time Frame: 30-day follow-up
in days
30-day follow-up
Postprocedural morbidity (%)
Time Frame: 30-day follow-up
including acute kidney failure, cardiac decompensation and unexpected need for vasopressor or inotropic support (all yes/no)
30-day follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nicolas M Van Mieghem, Prof MD PhD, Erasmus Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 14, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 14, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Pressure volume (PV) loop measurement

Subscribe