Effect of Sodium and UF Profiling on Dialysis

January 17, 2024 updated by: Neveen Hassan, Assiut University

Effect of Sodium and Ultrafiltration Profiling on Hemodynamic Stability, Interdialytic Weight Gain, and Intradialytic Complications.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of sodium and UF profiling on hemodynamic stability, interdialytic weight gain, and intradialytic complications

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Sodium and ultrafiltration profiling are method of dialysis in which dialysate sodium concentration and ultrafiltration rate are altered during the course of the dialysis session.

Several sodium profiling methods are available. Increasing, decreasing, or alternating sodium concentrations may be used, although decreasing profiling has been the most accepted. The decrease in dialysate sodium concentration may be linear, stepwise, or exponential As different sodium profiling methods may have distinct impacts, different dialysis modalities may also affect the outcome of profiling. Although not as commonly used, hemodiafiltration HDF which utilizes convective clearance in addition to diffusion, may change the results of sodium profiling Such intervention alleviates the acute decline in intravascular volume during ultrafiltration UF as well as the decline in intradialytic plasma osmolarity and the consequent disequilibrium syndrome Sodium profiling enhances the internal plasma refill rate and helps to stabilize the blood pressure, thus decreasing the risk of Intra dialytic hypotension. It is imperative to limit or prevent intradialytic hypotension since it does not only affect the patient's comfort but also increases the risk of vascular access thrombosis, myocardial fibrosis and stunning, cardiovascular events, and mortality So it has potential benefits in terms of intradialytic morbidity and mortality as well as quality of life and long-term cardiovascular events; nevertheless, it may also predispose to interdialytic hypernatremia and increased interdialytic hypernatremia and interdialytic weight gain IDWG and hypertension. Fatigue and thirst have been reported with sodium profiling and the resulting sodium overload.

Another method to avoid intradialytic hemodynamic instability is UF profiling. In it, a larger portion of total UF volume is extracted during the first part of a dialysis session, after which the UF rate is decreased in order to maintain hemodynamic stability However, achieving a correct intradialytic sodium balance is a much more difficult task in clinical practice. With the advances in technology, automatic computer-based programs can be used today to calculate intradialytic sodium removal. These models use real-time data from patients and are being used to reach underdialysis sodium, weight in Kg, and blood volume targets. Such biofeedback systems enable to achieve sodium balance neutral sodium profile and UF profile automatically. Currently, there are various commercial dialysis systems that calculate dialysate and UF profiles with algorithms based on the prescribed decrease in body weight and sodium mass.

The aim of study to determine which specific profiling methods is more efficacious in preventing specific symptoms and which profiling method has the most utility in routine clinical practice. Furthermore, more qualitative data is warranted for subjective analysis of quality of life and personal well-being.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Ragda Hassan, 3
  • Phone Number: +20 106 482 4351

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

End-stage renal disease on regular HD

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • End-stage renal disease patients.
  • Patients on regular hemodialysis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who refuse to contribute in this study.
  • Hemodynamically unstable patients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The primary outcome is systolic blood pressure (80 _130)mmhg and diastolic blood pressure within range (60_80)mmhg, A blood pressure within this range is considered indicative of a better health outcome for the purposes of our research
2 weeks
Dialysis symptoms index
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The Dialysis Symptom Index is a validated instrument to assess CKD-related unpleasant symptoms, and it is comprised of 30 questions about the presence of specifc symptoms For each question querying presence vs. absence of a specifc symptom, symptom severity is assessed using a five-point Likert scale, with each response ranging from 0 to 4 (i.e., a response of "0" indicates "no," whereas a response of "4" indicates "yes: very much"). The minimum-maxi- mum Dialysis Symptom Index score ranges from 0 to 120,with higher scores indicating worse outcome
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: youssef Saleh, Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 28, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 28, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Na and UF profiling on ESRD

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dialysis; Complications

Clinical Trials on Na and ultrafiltration profiling

Subscribe