Comparison Between Two Regenerative Scaffolds

January 25, 2024 updated by: Taghreed Salah, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls

Comparison Between Two Regenerative Scaffolds Outcome in The Treatment of Mature Teeth With Necrotic Pulp and Periapical Radiolucency

This study was performed to compare endodontic regeneration outcome in necrotic mature single rooted teeth with periapical radiolucency using platelet rich fibrin (PRF) & concentrated growth factor (CGF) as a different natural scaffold by evaluation of:

  • Regaining pulp sensibility by thermal test (hot and cold)
  • Periapical healing using digital radiography and selected samples will be evaluated using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The current study was designed as randomized controlled clinical trial with an allocation ratio 1:1 and conducted in the clinic of Endodontic Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University. The study was designed, analyzed and interpreted according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT 2010) checklist of information. Ethical approval for the human research was obtained in accordance with guidelines from Research Ethics Committee (REC) of the institute with the code number: P-EN-21-02. All patients read and signed an informed consent form with details about the study along with the benefits and risks of the therapy (Appendix A).A total of thirty-six patients were examined for this study.

After clinical and radiographic examinations only eighteen patients from cases that were fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected according to sample size calculation. Eighteen cases was divided randomly into two groups (9 cases each):

Group I (PRF group):

Preparation of PRF:

Five ml blood was drawn from the patient's right median cubital vein into a test tube without the addition of an anticoagulant and centrifuged immediately at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes

Group II (CGF group):

Preparation of CGF:

Ten ml of intravenous blood sample from the patient will be obtained and placed in centrifuge tubes without anticoagulants; accelerated for 30 seconds; centrifuged at 2700 rpm for 2 min, 2400 rpm for 4 min, 2700 rpm for 4 min, and 3000 rpm for 3 min; and decelerated for 36 secs to stop.

Methodology:

Common treatment protocol will be as follow:

First visit: tooth was isolated using rubber dam followed by access cavity preparation and working length determination. Mechanical preparation of root canal was performed using rotary instrumentation then the canal was irrigated by 1.5% NaOCl between each successive file. After drying the canal with paper point, Calcium hydroxide as intracanal medicament was placed. The access cavity was sealed with a cotton pellet and glass ionomer cement for three weeks.

Second visit: plain anesthesia without a vasoconstrictor was administrated. Glass ionomer was removed under the isolation with rubber dam. Calcium hydroxide was flushed from the canal using 5ml sterile saline followed by irrigation using 20ml of 17% ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) then drying the canal using paper point. Intentional over-instrumentation 3 mm beyond the apex was done using sterile #35 k file to induce bleeding inside the canal followed by placement of PRF and CGF inside the canal in group I and group II respectively followed by placement of 3 mm mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) below cementoenamel junction and the coronal cavity will be sealed using composite.

The regeneration outcome will be evaluated 6 month and 1 year follow up, clinically using thermal test to ensure the restoration of pulp sensibility or not and radiographically using digital radiograph to assess the periapical healing. Selected samples will be evaluated using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls Al Azhar University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Agree to participate in this study and provide informed consent
  • Age range of 18 - 30 years
  • Free from systemic diseases.
  • Having necrotic single-rooted maxillary central incisor with mature root and periapical radiolucency sized up to 5mm.
  • Restorable teeth that can be isolated with rubber dam and restored with direct coronal restoration.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant females.
  • Generalized chronic periodontitis.
  • Non-restorable teeth.
  • Previous root canal treatment.
  • Developmental anomalies.
  • External and / or internal root resorption.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PRF group
Five ml blood will be drawn from the patient's right median cubital vein into a test tube without the addition of an anticoagulant and centrifuged immediately at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes
regeneration of mature necrotic teeth with periapical abscess using concentrated growth factor compared with Platelet rich fibrin to allow healing of periapical lesion and regaining sensibility
Other Names:
  • Endodontic regeneration of mature teeth
Experimental: CGF group
Ten ml of intravenous blood sample from the patient will be obtained and placed in centrifuge tubes without anticoagulants; accelerated for 30 seconds; centrifuged at 2700 rpm for 2 min, 2400 rpm for 4 min, 2700 rpm for 4 min, and 3000 rpm for 3 min; and decelerated for 36 secs to stop
regeneration of mature necrotic teeth with periapical abscess using concentrated growth factor compared with Platelet rich fibrin to allow healing of periapical lesion and regaining sensibility
Other Names:
  • Endodontic regeneration of mature teeth

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
healing
Time Frame: 1 year
The elimination of symptoms and the evidence of periapical bony healing assessed radiographically (incidence of bone formation at the apex of root which indicate complete healing of chronic periapical abscess which assessed by periapical radiograph and cbct at 6 months & 1 year after treatment , as it appear radiolucency in radiograph which decrease by time that indicate complete healing of abscess and reformation of bone apically
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
regaining of pulp sensibility
Time Frame: 1 year
restoration of normal pulp sensation assessed by thermal test (hot using hot water in plastic syringe & cold using endo ice ) after isolation of the tooth.. thermal test was done before treatment then 6 month &1 year follow up and ask the patient about his sensation
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: heba abd el kafy, lecturer, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls Al Azhar University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

January 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulp Necroses

Clinical Trials on Endodontic regeneration using concentrated growth factor compared with Platelet rich fibrin

Subscribe