Telephone Support vs. Self-guidance in an Internet-based Self-administered Psychological Program to Address Depression

January 18, 2024 updated by: Universitat Jaume I

Telephone Support vs. Self-guidance in an Internet-based Self-administered Psychological Program for the Treatment of Depression

Depression is a first level problem that poses a challenge for Primary Care (PC). The overload of care in this area requires lower-cost and more accessible alternatives. Internet-based self-applied cognitive behavioral treatments (CBCT) have demonstrated their efficacy and added advantages. The "Smiling is fun" program has been validated in Spanish PC and has demonstrated its usefulness and cost-effectiveness. Previous studies have shown that professional support or guidance increases the results of the TCCI.

The aim of the present study is to contrast, by means of a randomized controlled trial, aims to examine the effectiveness, adherence rates, and implementation process of Smiling is Fun to address depression in a PC setting considering the influence of telephone support vs no support.

Ultimately, the results of the study could help in the uptake of sustainable resources so that the population could gain better access to psychological interventions in mental health services.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Depression is already the leading psychological disability around the world, impairing daily life, well-being, and social functioning and leading to personal and social costs. Despite the effectiveness of Evidence-Based Psychological Practices (EBPP), a significant percentage of depressive individuals remain untreated, especially in Primary Care (PC) settings in Spain. There are numerous barriers that limit access to EBPPs, including high costs, professional training, and adherence problems. Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) offer a cost-effective way to disseminate and scale EBPPs to address these barriers. The iCBT program Smiling is Fun has been demonstrated to be a cost-effective treatment for depression in various Randomized Control Trials. However, adherence and implementation problems in real-world settings need to be addressed. Implementation research can help evaluate these challenges by identifying facilitators and barriers to the implementation process in PC. In this regard, guided support has been pointed out as a possible key factor in addressing the population's mental health needs and promoting treatment adherence. Objective: The current study aims to examine the effectiveness, adherence rates, and implementation process of Smiling is Fun to address depression in a PC setting considering the influence of telephone support vs no support. Methods: The proposed research is a Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Type I study, with a two-armed randomized controlled design, which will test a clinical intervention for major depressive disorder while gathering information on its implementation in a real-world setting. The study will include adult patients with mild to moderate symptoms of depression. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: self-applied psychotherapy or self-applied psychotherapy with psychotherapeutic telephone support. The trial will recruit 100 patient participants, with a loss-to-follow-up rate of 30%. Discussion: A study protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study is presented with the aim to assess the implementation of Smiling is Fun for the treatment of depression in PC. The study evaluates the influence of telephone support during a self-administered intervention compared to unguided self-administration. The main goal is to address the barriers and facilitators of the implementation process and to promote treatment adherence. Ultimately, the results of the study could help in the uptake of sustainable resources so that the population could gain better access to psychological interventions in mental health services.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Rosa Lorente Català
  • Phone Number: 0034 691527941
  • Email: rlorente@uji.es

Study Locations

    • Valencia
      • Tavernes de la Valldigna, Valencia, Spain, 46760
        • Recruiting
        • Psicología Clínica Unitat de Salut Mental Hospital Francesc de Borja
        • Contact:
          • Rosa Lorente Català

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 65 years.
  • Ability to understand and read Spanish.
  • Meet diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder (DSM-5).
  • Mild or moderate symptoms of the Spanish version of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) (14-19: mild depression; 20-28: moderate depression).
  • Episode duration of more than two weeks.
  • Have internet access at home and an email account.
  • The diagnosis of major depressive disorder will be confirmed by the standardized MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Professional support
Participants randomly assigned to this groups will receive the self-administered psychotherapy via the Internet a with telephone psychotherapeutic support.

Participants will receive an intervention called Smiling is Fun; a cognitve-conductual online program with the most effective psychological procedures for depression and other techniques to promote coping ability, emotional regulation and resilience along 8 modules.

While they do the online program, they will receive periodically professional support. The professional support will be contacts of 20 minutes long, will take place every two weeks and will last 3 months.

Active Comparator: Non professional support
Participants randomly assigned to this group will receive the self-administered psychotherapy via the Internet without telephone psychotherapeutic support.
Participants will receive an intervention called Smiling is Fun; a cognitve-conductual online program with the most effective psychological procedures for depression and other techniques to promote coping ability, emotional regulation and resilience along 8 modules.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment efficacy
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention and follow-up (3,6 and 12 months).
Change of depression symtpmatology through the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II).
Pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention and follow-up (3,6 and 12 months).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life related to health
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention and follow-up (3,6 and 12 months).
The qualitiy of life related to health apsects will be measured using : EuroQol (EQ-5D) and Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)
Pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention and follow-up (3,6 and 12 months).

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence to the treatment
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
The adherence to the treatment will be assessed according to the moduls done by the patient in the plataform
Immediately after the intervention
Implementation outcome: Feasibility
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
Professionals' assessment: Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) (Weiner et al., 2017). A four items scale on a 5-point Likert scale assess the feasibility of an intervention in a specific context. The FIM showed high levels of internal consistency (α =0,89) and test-retest reliability coefficients (α =0,88).
Immediately after the intervention
Implementation outcome: Acceptability
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
Professionals' assessment: Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) (Weiner et al., 2017). A 4-item scale (from 1= completely disagree to 5= completely agree) that assesses the perception of the stakeholders about the agreeableness of treatment in a specific context. The construct has shown good psychometric properties with high levels of internal consistency (α =0.89) and test-retest reliability (α =0.83).
Immediately after the intervention
Implementation outcome: Appropiateness
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
Professionals' assessment: Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) (Weiner et al., 2017). A 4-item scale (from 1= completely disagree to 5= completely agree) that measures the appropriateness of the intervention. The scale has shown good psychometric properties with high levels of internal consistency (α =0.87) and test-retest reliability (α =0.87)
Immediately after the intervention
Implementation outcome: Normalization
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
Professionals' assessment: Normalization MeAsure Development Questionnaire (NoMAD) (Finch et al., 2018). Based on the Normalization Process Theory, the NoMAD, a questionnaire of 13 items 5-Likert scale (from strongly agree to strongly disagree), has been developed to assess the process of normalization (May et al., 2009). The NoMAD focuses on four dimensions: coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring. This questionnaire has demonstrated high levels of internal consistency along the four dimensions (20 items) (alpha=0.89).
Immediately after the intervention
Implementation outcome: Attitudes Towards Psychological Online Intervention
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
Professionals' assessment: Attitudes towards Psychological Online Interventions (APOI) (Schröder et al., 2015). A 16-item questionnaire, with a 5-point Likert scale, assesses attitudes toward IBT. The APOI explores four dimensions; "Skepticism and Perception of Risks", "Confidence in Effectiveness", "Technologization Threat" and "Anonymity Benefits". The scale has shown acceptable to good internal consistency (α=0.77) (Schröder et al., 2015).
Immediately after the intervention
Implementation outcome: Sustainability
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
Professionals' assessment: Barriers and facilitators of the implementation (FBI). The FBI is a questionnaire specifically developed for this study and the study conducted by Lorente-Català et al. (2022). The questionnaire was created following the systematic review on EBT implementation barriers and facilitators among third sector organizations (Bach-Mortensen et al., 2018). As a result, 28 items assess the possible barriers, and 15 items evaluate the facilitators.
Immediately after the intervention
Implementation outcome: Satisfactions
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire adapted to Internet-Based Interventions (CSQ-I; Boß et al., 2016). This 9-item questionnaire assesses participants' satisfaction with IBI. Items are presented on a 1 to 4 Likert scale in which 1 "does not apply to me" and 4 "does apply to me". The total score ranges from 8 to 32. It has adequate psychometric properties, Boß et al. (2016) rate Omega = 0.93 and 0.95 in two different samples.
Immediately after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Azucena García Palacios, Universidad Jaume I
  • Study Director: Pedro Vera Albero, F.E.D. Psicología Clínica Unitat de Salut Mental Hospital Francesc de Borja
  • Study Chair: Raquel Escriva Sanchis, F.E.D. Psicología Clínica Unitat de Salut Mental Hospital Francesc de Borja
  • Study Chair: Clara Bretó García, F.E.D. Psicología Clínica Unitat de Salut Mental Hospital Francesc de Borja

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Smiling is fun + professional support

Subscribe