VECTORS - A Study to Evaluate Transmural Healing as a Treatment Target in Crohn's Disease (VECTORS)

January 14, 2026 updated by: Alimentiv Inc.

An Interventional Study to Evaluate Treating to a Target of Transmural Healing in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease

Transmural healing (TMH) is recognized as a potentially important measure of Crohn's disease (CD) activity but not a formal target. Observational studies suggest that TMH may be associated with better long-term outcomes. The study will evaluate TMH using noninvasive intestinal ultrasound (IUS), a patient-friendly technique that can be performed routinely in clinical practice. The aim of the study is to determine if treating to a target of corticosteroid-free (CS-free) IUS outcomes + clinical symptoms + biomarkers is superior to a target of clinical symptoms + biomarkers alone in achieving CS-free endoscopic remission measured by the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD).

Qualified participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of 2 different target treatment groups.

Group 1: Participants will be treated over 48 weeks to achieve a target of corticosteroid-free IUS-based outcomes + clinical remission + biomarker remission. At Week 22 and 30, the IUS-based component of the target will be IUS response and at Week 38, the final treatment target will be TMH. Group 2: Participants will be treated over 48 weeks to achieve a target of corticosteroid-free clinical remission + biomarker remission.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

304

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Concord, New South Wales, Australia, 2139
        • Recruiting
        • Concord Repatriation General Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Aviv Puddpedi, MD
    • Queensland
      • South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4101
        • Recruiting
        • Mater Misericordiae Ltd
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jakob Begun, MD
    • South Australia
      • Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5000
        • Recruiting
        • Royal Adelaide Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kate Lynch, MD
      • Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5000
        • Recruiting
        • Calvary Adelaide Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Patricia Kaazan, MD
      • Woodville, South Australia, Australia, 5011
        • Recruiting
        • The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Robert Bryant, MD
    • Victoria
      • Epping, Victoria, Australia, 3076
        • Recruiting
        • Northern Hospital Epping
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mayur Garg, MD
      • Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia, 3084
        • Recruiting
        • Austin Health
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Peter De Cruz, MD
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004
        • Recruiting
        • The Alfred Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Miles Sparrow, MD
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
        • Recruiting
        • Royal Melbourne Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Zaid Ardalan, MD
    • Western Australia
      • Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia, 6150
        • Recruiting
        • Harry Perkins institute of Medical Research - Fiona Stanley Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lena Thin, MD
      • Brussels, Belgium, 1070
        • Recruiting
        • ULB Hôpital Erasme
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Denis Franchimont, MD
    • Antwerp
      • Bonheiden, Antwerp, Belgium, 2820
        • Recruiting
        • Imelda Ziekenhuis Bonheiden
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Peter Bossuyt, MD
    • Antwerpen
      • Sint-Niklaas, Antwerpen, Belgium, 9100
        • Recruiting
        • VITAZ - AZ Nikolaas
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Tom Holvoet, MD
    • East Flanders
      • Ghent, East Flanders, Belgium, 9000
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Ghent
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Triana Lobaton Ortega, MD
    • Flemish Brabant
      • Leuven, Flemish Brabant, Belgium, 3000
        • Recruiting
        • UZ Leuven-University Hospital Gasthuisberg
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bram Verstockt, MD
    • West Flanders
      • Roeselare, West Flanders, Belgium, 8800
        • Recruiting
        • AZ Delta - Rumbeke Campus
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Filip Baert, MD
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4Z6
        • Recruiting
        • University of Calgary
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kerri Novak, MD
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2X8
        • Recruiting
        • University of Alberta, Dept of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michal Gozdzik, MD
    • Nova Scotia
      • Bridgewater, Nova Scotia, Canada, B4V 3N2
        • Recruiting
        • Viable Clinical Research - Bridgewater
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hughie Fraser, MD
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5W9
        • Not yet recruiting
        • LHSC - Victoria Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Terry Ponich, MD
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5
        • Recruiting
        • LHSC - University Campus
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Melanie Beaton, MD
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • Toronto Immune and Digestive Health Institute Inc. (TIDHI)
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mark Silverberg, MD
    • South Moravian
      • Brno, South Moravian, Czechia, 615 00
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Vojenska nemocnice Brno
        • Principal Investigator:
          • David Stepek, MD
      • Brno, South Moravian, Czechia, 625 00
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Fakultni Nemocnice Brno
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stefan Konecny, MD
      • Svendborg, Denmark
        • Withdrawn
        • Svendborg Hospital
    • Capital
      • Copenhagen NV, Capital, Denmark, 2400
        • Recruiting
        • Bispebjerg Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kristian Mikkelsen, MD
      • Hvidovre, Capital, Denmark, 2650
        • Recruiting
        • Hvidovre Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Klaus Theede, MD
    • Capital Region
      • Herlev, Capital Region, Denmark, 2730
        • Recruiting
        • Herlev Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jacob Wium Bjerrum, MD
      • Hillerød, Capital Region, Denmark, 3400
        • Recruiting
        • Nordsjaellands Hospital - Hillerod
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Salvatore Leotta, MD
    • Central Denmark
      • Aarhus, Central Denmark, Denmark, 8200
        • Recruiting
        • Aarhus Universitetshospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anders Dige, MD
      • Randers, Central Denmark, Denmark, 83930
        • Recruiting
        • Randers Regional Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mia Bendix, MD
    • Region Sjælland
      • Køge, Region Sjælland, Denmark, 4600
        • Withdrawn
        • Sjaellands Universitets hospitall Koge
      • Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
        • Withdrawn
        • Groupe Hospitalier Prive Ambroise Pare - Hartmann
    • Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
      • Pierre-Bénite, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France, 69495
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Lyon Sud
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stephane Nancey, MD
    • Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur Region
      • Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur Region, France, 13015
        • Recruiting
        • APHM
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mélanie SERRERO, MD
      • Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
        • Withdrawn
        • Universitats Klinikum Freiburg
    • Bavaria
      • Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany, 86156
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Augsburg
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Elisabeth Schnoy, MD
    • Hesse
      • Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany, 60590
        • Withdrawn
        • Universitatsklinkum Frankfurt - Goethe Universitat
    • Lower Saxony
      • Lüneburg, Lower Saxony, Germany, 21339
        • Recruiting
        • Klinikum Luneburg
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christian Maaser, MD
    • Schleswig-Holstein
      • Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 24105
        • Recruiting
        • Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH)- Campus Kiel
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stefan Schreiber, MD
    • Foggia
      • San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy, 71013
        • Recruiting
        • Ospedale Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza IRCCS
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Fabrizio Bossa, MD
    • Lombardy
      • Milan, Lombardy, Italy, 20157
        • Recruiting
        • Ospedale Luigi Sacco
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Giovanni Maconi, MD
    • Milan
      • Milan, Milan, Italy, 20132
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Ospedale San Raffaele S.r.I.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mariangela Allocca, MD
    • Rome
      • Roma, Rome, Italy, 00168
        • Recruiting
        • Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Antonio Gasbarrini, MD
      • Tilburg, Netherlands
        • Withdrawn
        • ETZ - St. Elisabeth Hospital
    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525
        • Recruiting
        • Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marjolijn Duijvestein, MD
    • North Holland
      • Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands, 1081HV
        • Recruiting
        • Amsterdam UMC - VU Medisch Centrum
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Krisztina Gecse, MD
    • South Holland
      • Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands, 3015 GD
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Erasmus Medisch Centrum (MC)
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Annemarie De Vries, MD
      • Opole, Poland
        • Withdrawn
        • Twoja Przychodnia-Centrum Medyczne Opole
      • Wroclaw, Poland, 54-144
        • Recruiting
        • EuroMediCare (EMC) Instytut Medyczny SA
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Patryk Smolinski, MD
    • Gmina Leczna
      • Łęczna, Gmina Leczna, Poland, 21-010
        • Recruiting
        • Oddzial Gastroenterologiczny SP ZOZ w Lecznej
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lukasz Wolanski, MD
    • Greater Poland Voivodeship
      • Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship, Poland, 60-529
        • Recruiting
        • Solumed Centrum Medyczne
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Magdalena Andrzejewska, MD
    • Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship
      • Torun, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland, 87-100
        • Recruiting
        • GASTROMED - Kopon, Zmudzinski I Wspolnicy Sp.j.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Adam Kopon, MD
    • Lower Silesian Voivodeship
      • Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Poland, 53-611
        • Recruiting
        • Melita Medical Sp Zoo
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jaroslaw Leszczyszyn, MD
    • Masovia
      • Warsaw, Masovia, Poland, 04-501
        • Recruiting
        • WIP Warsaw IBD Point Profesor Kierkus
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jaroslaw Kierkus, MD
      • Warsaw, Masovia, Poland, 03-712
        • Recruiting
        • Bodyclinic Sp.z.o.o. Sp.K
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Piotr Gietka, MD
    • Podkarpackie Voivodeship
      • Rzeszów, Podkarpackie Voivodeship, Poland, 35-326
        • Recruiting
        • Centrum Medyczne MEDYK
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rafal Filip, MD
    • Silesian
      • Katowice, Silesian, Poland, 40-748
        • Recruiting
        • Vita Longa Sp. z o.o.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Przemyslaw Ramos, MD
    • West Pomerianian
      • Szczecin, West Pomerianian, Poland, 71-685
        • Recruiting
        • Sonomed Sp. z o.o. - Centrum Medyczne
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anna Wiechowska-Kozlowska, MD
      • Lisbon, Portugal
        • Not yet recruiting
        • LisbonCentro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, EPE- Hospital de Santa Maria
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Samuel Fernandes, MD
      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH4 2XU
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Western General Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nikolas Plevris, MD
      • London, United Kingdom, NW1 2BU
        • Recruiting
        • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Paul Harrow, MD
      • London, United Kingdom, SE5 9RS
        • Recruiting
        • Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Polychronis Pavlidis
      • London, United Kingdom, E1 2AJ
        • Recruiting
        • Barts Health NHS Trust - The Royal London Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gareth Parkes, MD
    • East Midlands
      • Nottingham, East Midlands, United Kingdom, NG7 2UH
        • Recruiting
        • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust - QMC
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sunil Samuel
    • Middlesex
      • Harrow, Middlesex, United Kingdom, HA1 3UJ
        • Withdrawn
        • London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust - Northwick Park Hospital
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Withdrawn
        • TLC Clinical Research Inc - Los Angeles
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC)
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Erin Forster, MD
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • Houston Methodist Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bincy Abraham, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults aged 18 to 80 years, inclusive, at the time of consent;
  2. Moderately to severely active CD at baseline defined by a CDAI score of 220 to 450 inclusive and SES-CD, excluding the presence of narrowing component, ≥6 (or ≥4 for participants with isolated ileal disease);
  3. BWT on IUS of >4.0 mm in the terminal ileum or any colonic segment (excluding the rectum) as assessed by the mean of 2 longitudinal and 2 cross-sectional measurements of the same segment;
  4. Biologic-naïve or have previous exposure (within the last 5 years of the screening date) to no more than 1 advanced therapeutic compound (approved biologic or small molecule drug) for the treatment of their CD. Note: only approximately 15% to 30% of the enrolled population will have had prior exposure to an advanced therapeutic;
  5. Participants may continue stable dose (initiated at least 4 weeks prior to Screening) of 5-ASA for CD;
  6. Persons of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test prior to randomization and must use a highly effective method of contraception throughout the study. Females unable to bear children must have documentation of such in the source records;
  7. Able to participate fully in all aspects of this clinical trial;
  8. Written informed consent must be obtained and documented.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current or previous treatment with vedolizumab, etrolizumab, or natalizumab;
  2. Previously exposed to 2 or more compounds or classes of an advanced therapeutic compound (approved biologic or small molecule drug) for the treatment of their CD;
  3. Change to oral corticosteroid therapy dosing within 2 weeks prior to randomization or a corticosteroid dose of >40 mg of prednisone or equivalent at randomization;
  4. Only have inflammation proximal to the terminal ileum that cannot be reached by ileocolonoscopy;
  5. Have a CD complication, such as symptomatic strictures in the small bowel with >3 cm prestenotic dilatation on any imaging modality, requiring procedural intervention;
  6. Previous extensive colonic resection or missing >2 segments out of 5 (terminal ileum, right colon, transverse colon, sigmoid and left colon, and rectum), ileorectal anastomosis, or a proctocolectomy;
  7. Ostomy or ileoanal pouch;
  8. Short bowel syndrome;
  9. Fibrotic-only stricture in the ileum or colon without evidence of active inflammation (in the investigator's judgment), including any impassable stenosis;
  10. Abscess >2 cm, detected by IUS or endoscopy; participants with draining fistulas are not excluded;
  11. Serious underlying disease other than CD that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the participant's ability to participate fully in the study or would compromise participant safety;
  12. Positive stool test for Clostridioides difficile infection (as demonstrated by positive toxin);
  13. Known HIV or hepatitis B or C infection. If a negative test result is available in the 12 months prior to randomization, retesting is not required;
  14. Known active or latent tuberculosis (TB); if a negative test result is available in the 12 months prior to randomization, confirmatory testing (per standard of care) is not required before randomization;
  15. Other systemic or opportunistic infection (including cytomegalovirus), any other clinically significant extraintestinal infection, or recurring infection within 6 months of randomization;
  16. Has active cerebral/meningeal disease, signs, symptoms, or any history of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) prior to randomization;
  17. Hypersensitivity, allergy, or intolerance to any excipient of vedolizumab or any other contraindication to vedolizumab;
  18. Active severe infection such as sepsis, cytomegalovirus, listeriosis, or opportunistic infection.
  19. Unwillingness to withhold protocol-prohibited medications during the trial;
  20. Concurrent or previous participation in another clinical trial and received any investigational therapy within 30 days prior to randomization;
  21. History of alcohol or drug abuse that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the participant's ability to comply with the study procedures;
  22. Prior enrolment in the current study and had received study treatment;
  23. Pregnant, lactating, or intending to become pregnant/impregnate a partner before, during, or within 18 weeks after the last dose; or intending to donate ova or sperm during such time period;
  24. Vaccination with a live or live-attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks prior to randomization, or planned vaccination with a live or live-attenuated vaccine during participation in the study;
  25. Any person performing mandatory military service, deprived of liberty, in a residential care setting, or any person who, due to a judicial decision, cannot take part in clinical studies;
  26. The person is an immediate family member, study site employee, or is in a dependent relationship with a study site employee who is involved in conduct of this study (e.g., spouse, parent, child, sibling).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Group 1: Corticosteroid-free IUS-based outcomes + clinical remission + biomarker remission
Group 1 will be treated over 48 weeks to achieve a target of corticosteroid-free IUS-based outcomes + clinical remission + biomarker remission. At Week 22 and 30, the IUS-based component of the target will be IUS response and at Week 38, the final treatment target will be TMH.
All participants will begin a vedolizumab induction regimen of 300 mg IV at Weeks 0, 2, 6, and 10 followed by vedolizumab 300 mg IV every 8 weeks starting at Week 14. Treatment may be modified at Weeks 22, 30, and/or 38 based on the results of the target assessment at each of these time points.
Other: Group 2: Corticosteroid-free clinical remission + biomarker remission.
Group 2 will be treated over 48 weeks to achieve a target of corticosteroid-free clinical remission + biomarker remission.
All participants will begin a vedolizumab induction regimen of 300 mg IV at Weeks 0, 2, 6, and 10 followed by vedolizumab 300 mg IV every 8 weeks starting at Week 14. Treatment may be modified at Weeks 22, 30, and/or 38 based on the results of the target assessment at each of these time points.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of participants with Corticosteroid-free Endoscopic remission in group 1 and group 2 at week 48
Time Frame: week 48
Corticosteroid-free is defined as not using corticosteroids at the time of the assessment. Endoscopic remission is defined by a total Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) ≤4 and at least a 2-point reduction versus baseline with no subscore greater than 1 in any individual variable. The SES-CD scores 4 endoscopic items (ulcer size, proportion of ulcerated surface, proportion of the surface area affected by any disease lesion, and stenosis) from 0 to 3, with higher scores representing more severe endoscopic disease activity. Each variable is scored for the 5 intestinal segments (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum) and summed to provide the total variable score. The sum of each variable score ranges from 0 to 15, except for stenosis (ranges from 0 to 11), because 3 represents a stenosis through which a colonoscope cannot be passed and therefore, can only be observed once. Total SES-CD score is then calculated by summing the item scores (range, 0-56 points).
week 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of participants with Corticosteroid-free Transmural healing (TMH)+Endoscopic remission+Clinical remission in group 1 and group 2 at week 48
Time Frame: week 48

Transmural healing is defined by Bowel wall thickness (BWT) ≤3.0 mm and color Doppler signal (CDS) 0 in all evaluable segments assessed by Intestinal Ultrasound.

Endoscopic remission is defined by achievement of a total Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) ≤4 and at least a 2-point reduction versus baseline with no subscore greater than 1 in any individual variable. The SES-CD assesses 4 endoscopic variables: the size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, and presence of narrowing. Each variable score ranging from 0 to 3. The total SES-CD score is calculated using the sum of all parameter scores in 5 segments: terminal ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum.

Clinical Remission is defined by achievement of Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <150.

CDAI consists of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity.

week 48
Percentage of participants with Corticosteroid-free IUS response+Endoscopic remission+Clinical Remission in group 1 and group 2 at week 48
Time Frame: week 48

IUS response is defined by reduction from baseline of 25% in Bowel Wall thickness (BWT) assessed by Intestinal Ultrasound (IUS).

Endoscopic remission is defined by achievement of a total Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) ≤4 and at least a 2-point reduction versus baseline with no subscore greater than 1 in any individual variable.

Clinical Remission is defined by achievement of Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <150.

The CDAI consists of 8 items including physical examination items, extraintestinal manifestations, the hematocrit, and PRO measures as recorded in the participant diary card for the 7 days prior to the clinic visit. Each item is multiplied by a weighting factor and summed to give a total CDAI score, ranging from 0 to over 600 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease activity.

week 48
Percentage of participants with Corticosteroid-free Endoscopic remission+Clinical Remission in group 1 and group 2 at week 48
Time Frame: week 48

Endoscopic remission is defined by achievement of a total Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) ≤4 and at least a 2-point reduction versus baseline with no subscore greater than 1 in any individual variable. The SES-CD scores 4 endoscopic items (ulcer size, proportion of ulcerated surface, proportion of the surface area affected by any disease lesion, and stenosis) from 0 to 3. Each variable is scored for the 5 intestinal segments (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum) and summed to provide the total variable score. Total SES-CD score is then summed up the item scores (range, 0-56 points).

Clinical Remission is defined by Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <150. CDAI consists of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity.

week 48
Percentage of participants with Corticosteroid-free endoscopic response+Clinical response in group 1 and group 2 at week 48
Time Frame: week 48

Endoscopic response is defined by Reduction in total Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) ≥50% from baseline. The SES-CD scores 4 endoscopic items (ulcer size, proportion of ulcerated surface, proportion of the surface area affected by any disease lesion, and stenosis) from 0 to 3, higher scores indicate more severity. Each variable is scored for the 5 intestinal segments (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum) and summed to provide the total variable score. The sum of each variable score ranges from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it ranges from 0 to 11. Total SES-CD score is then calculated by summing the item scores (range, 0-56 points).

Clinical Response is defined by Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) decrease of ≥100 points from baseline. CDAI consists of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity.

week 48
Percentage of participants with Corticosteroid-free clinical remission in group 1 and group 2 at Week 14, Week 22 and Week 48.
Time Frame: week 14, week 22 and week 48

Corticosteroid-free is defined as not using corticosteroids for treatment of CD at the time of the assessment.

Clinical Remission is defined by achievement of Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <150.

The CDAI consists of 8 items including physical examination items, extraintestinal manifestations, the hematocrit, and PRO measures as recorded in the participant diary card for the 7 days prior to the clinic visit. Each item is multiplied by a weighting factor and summed to give a total CDAI score, ranging from 0 to over 600 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease activity.

week 14, week 22 and week 48
Percentage of participants with Corticosteroid-free Clinical Response in group 1 and group 2 at week 14, week 22 and week 48
Time Frame: week 14, week 22 and week 48

Corticosteroid-free is defined as not using corticosteroids for treatment of CD at the time of the assessment.

Clinical Response is defined by Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) decrease of ≥100 points from baseline. The CDAI consists of 8 items including physical examination items, extraintestinal manifestations, the hematocrit, and PRO measures as recorded in the participant diary card for the 7 days prior to the clinic visit. Each item is multiplied by a weighting factor and summed to give a total CDAI score, ranging from 0 to over 600 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease activity.

week 14, week 22 and week 48
Crohn's Disease Activity Index(CDAI) total score and corresponding change from baseline during follow-up (Week 6, Week 14, Week 22, Week 30, Week 38, Week 48, Week 64, Week 80, Week 96) in group 1 and group 2
Time Frame: week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) consists of 8 items including physical examination items, extraintestinal manifestations, the hematocrit, and PRO measures as recorded in the participant diary card for the 7 days prior to the clinic visit. Each item is multiplied by a weighting factor and summed to give a total CDAI score, ranging from 0 to over 600 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease activity.
week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
Percentage of participants with Corticosteroid-free endoscopic response in group 1 and group 2 at week 48
Time Frame: week 48
Corticosteroid-free is defined as not using corticosteroids for treatment of CD at the time of the assessment Endoscopic response is defined by Reduction in total Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) ≥50% from baseline. The SES-CD scores 4 endoscopic items (ulcer size, proportion of ulcerated surface, proportion of the surface area affected by any disease lesion, and stenosis) from 0 to 3, with higher scores representing more severe endoscopic disease activity. Each variable is scored for the 5 intestinal segments (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum) and summed to provide the total variable score. The sum of each variable score ranges from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it ranges from 0 to 11, because 3 represents a stenosis through which a colonoscope cannot be passed and therefore, can only be observed once. Total SES-CD score is then calculated by summing the item scores (range, 0-56 points).
week 48
SES-CD total score and corresponding change from baseline to Week 48 in group 1 and group 2
Time Frame: week 48
The SES-CD scores 4 endoscopic items (ulcer size, proportion of ulcerated surface, proportion of the surface area affected by any disease lesion, and stenosis) from 0 to 3, with higher scores representing more severe endoscopic disease activity. Each variable is scored for the 5 intestinal segments (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum) and summed to provide the total variable score. The sum of each variable score ranges from 0 to 15, except for stenosis, where it ranges from 0 to 11, because 3 represents a stenosis through which a colonoscope cannot be passed and therefore, can only be observed once. Total SES-CD score is then calculated by summing the item scores (range, 0-56 points).
week 48
Percentage of participants with Transmural healing (TMH) in group 1 and group 2 at week 48
Time Frame: week 48
Transmural Healing (TMH) is defined by Bowel wall thickness (BWT) ≤3.0 mm and color Doppler signal (CDS) 0 in all evaluable segments assessed by Intestinal Ultrasound
week 48
Percentage of participants with Intestinal Ultrasound (IUS) response in group 1 and group 2 at Week 48
Time Frame: week 48
IUS response is defined by reduction from baseline of 25% in Bowel Wall thickness (BWT) assessed by Intestinal Ultrasound (IUS)
week 48
Bowel Wall Thickness (BWT) measured by Intestinal Ultrasound (IUS) in mm and corresponding change from baseline at Week 48 in group 1 and group 2.
Time Frame: week 48
week 48
Color Doppler signal (CDS) and corresponding change from baseline at Week 48 in group 1 and group 2.
Time Frame: week 48
week 48
International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score (IBUS-SAS) (per segment as well as total) and corresponding change from baseline at Week 48 in group 1 and group 2
Time Frame: week 48
International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score (IBUS-SAS) is a 0-100 numerical activity index for Crohn's disease calculated from four Intestinal Ultrasound (IUS) parameters
week 48
Percentage of participants with Transmural healing (TMH) at week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, and week 48 in group 1
Time Frame: week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48
Transmural Healing (TMH) is defined by Bowel wall thickness (BWT) ≤3.0 mm and color Doppler signal (CDS) 0 in all evaluable segments assessed by Intestinal Ultrasound
week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48
Percentage of participants with Intestinal Ultrasound (IUS) response at week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, and week 48 in group 1
Time Frame: week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48
IUS response is defined by reduction from baseline of 25% in Bowel Wall thickness (BWT) assessed by Intestinal Ultrasound (IUS)
week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48
Bowel Wall Thickness (BWT) measured by Intestinal Ultrasound (IUS) in mm and corresponding change from baseline at week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, and week 48 in group 1
Time Frame: week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48
week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48
Color Doppler signal (CDS) and corresponding change from baseline at week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, and week 48 in group 1
Time Frame: week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48
week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48
International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score (IBUS-SAS) (per segment as well as total) and corresponding change from baseline at week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, and week 48 in group 1
Time Frame: week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48
International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score (IBUS-SAS) is a 0-100 numerical activity index for Crohn's disease calculated from four Intestinal Ultrasound (IUS) parameters
week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48
Percentage of participants with Histologic remission at week 48 in group 1 and group 2
Time Frame: week 48

Histologic remission is defined by Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) score ≤3 (per segment) with subscores of 0 for lamina propria neutrophils and 0 for neutrophils in epithelium, as scored by central reader.

The RHI is a validated instrument that measures histologic disease activity and consists of 4 subscores (chronic inflammatory infiltrate, lamina propria neutrophils, neutrophils in epithelium, and erosion or ulceration). Each subscore ranges from 0-3, with higher subscores indicating greater histologic disease activity. The RHI score is calculated as: (1 x chronic inflammatory infiltrate) + (2 x lamina propria neutrophils) + (3 x neutrophils in epithelium) + (5 x erosion or ulceration). The RHI therefore ranges from 0-33, with higher scores indicating greater histologic disease activity.

week 48
Percentage of participants with Histologic response at week 48 in group 1 and group 2
Time Frame: week 48

Histologic response is defined as ≥7-point reduction from baseline in RHI, as scored by a central reader.

The RHI is a validated instrument that measures histologic disease activity and consists of 4 subscores (chronic inflammatory infiltrate, lamina propria neutrophils, neutrophils in epithelium, and erosion or ulceration). Each subscore ranges from 0-3, with higher subscores indicating greater histologic disease activity. The RHI score is calculated as: (1 x chronic inflammatory infiltrate) + (2 x lamina propria neutrophils) + (3 x neutrophils in epithelium) + (5 x erosion or ulceration). The RHI therefore ranges from 0-33, with higher scores indicating greater histologic disease activity.

week 48
Percentage of patients with Biomarker response at week 48, week 64, week 80 and week 96 in group 1 and group 2
Time Frame: week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
Biomarker response is defined as ≥50% reduction from baseline in either C-reactive protein (CRP) or fecal calprotectin (FCal)
week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
Percentage of participants with C-reactive protein (CRP) response during follow-up (Week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80 and week 96) in group 1 and group 2
Time Frame: week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
C-reactive protein (CRP) response is defined by ≥50% reduction from baseline
week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
Percentage of participants with fecal calprotectin (FCal) response during follow-up (Week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80 and week 96) in group 1 and group 2
Time Frame: week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
Fecal calprotectin (FCal) response is defined by ≥50% reduction from baseline
week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
Changes in C-reactive protein (CRP) from baseline during follow-up (Week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80 and week 96) in group 1 and group 2
Time Frame: week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
Changes in fecal calprotectin (FCal) from baseline during follow-up (Week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80 and week 96) in group 1 and group 2
Time Frame: week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
2-item Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO-2) score and corresponding changes from baseline during follow-up (Weeks 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80 and week 96) in group 1 and group 2
Time Frame: week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
The PRO-2 consists of the 2 CDAI component items: daily stool frequency and abdominal pain. Study participants record the number of liquid or very soft stools and rate abdominal pain (range, 0-3) daily in their participant diary for the 7 days prior to a clinic visit, excluding days of bowel preparation and ileocolonoscopy. The stool frequency and abdominal pain scores are calculated as the average scores over the 7-day period.
week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire for CD (SIQ-CD) score and corresponding changes from baseline during follow-up (Weeks 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80 and week 96) in group 1 and group 2
Time Frame: week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
SIQ-CD tool consists of a symptom domain, which includes Gastrointestinal (GI), pain and discomfort, nutrition-related, and fatigue-related symptoms; and an impact domain, which includes concepts related to daily activities, nutrition, emotional well-being, and productivity.
week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
Urgency Numerical Rating Score (NRS) and corresponding changes from baseline during follow-up (Weeks 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80 and week 96) in group 1 and group 2
Time Frame: week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
The Urgency NRS evaluates the participant's sense of urgency to have a bowel movement over the previous 24 hours and is rated on an 11-point Likert scale, from 0 for "no urgency" to 10 for "worst possible urgency"
week 6, week 14, week 22, week 30, week 38, week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) score and corresponding changes from baseline during follow-up (Weeks 30, week 48 and week 96) in group 1 and group 2
Time Frame: week 30, week 48, week 96
The IBDQ measures health related quality of life in subjects with inflammatory bowel disease. It consists of 32 questions each with a graded response of 1 (worst) to 7 (best). The score ranges from 32 to 224
week 30, week 48, week 96
Time to CD-related complication from randomization through Week 96 in group 1 and group 2
Time Frame: from randomization through Week 96
CD-related complication will be defined as any of the following: (1) CD-related surgery; (2) CD-related hospitalization; (3) CD medication-related complication; (4) CD procedure-related complication; (5) Rescue therapy for a documented CD-related flare e.g., new initiation of an advanced therapy other than VDZ (approved biologic or small molecule), dose escalation of vedolizumab, or dose intensification beyond the dose used at randomization of a corticosteroid after Week 48 or; (6) Other CD-related complication
from randomization through Week 96
Time to each component of CD-related complication in group 1 and group 2
Time Frame: from randomization through Week 96
from randomization through Week 96
Percentage of participants who switched to an alternate biologic (yes/no) by Week 48 and Week 96
Time Frame: week 48, week 96
week 48, week 96
Exposure-adjusted incidence rates of serious adverse events (SAEs), all adverse events (AEs), and AEs of special interest (AESIs) in group 1 and group 2
Time Frame: up to week 96
Defined as the number of participants experiencing the event per 100 person-years (PYs) of exposure.
up to week 96
Percentage of patients with Biomarker remission at week 48, week 64, week 80 and week 96 in group 1 and group 2
Time Frame: week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96
Biomarker remission is defined as Normalization of C-reactive protein (CRP) <5 mg/mL and fecal calprotectin (FCal) <250 μg/g
week 48, week 64, week 80, week 96

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vipul Jairath, MD, Alimentiv Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 7, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 3, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 6, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in this article may be made available upon reasonable request, subject to review and approval by the study sponsor, execution of a data use agreement, and in accordance with participant consent and applicable privacy and data protection requirements.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

06JAN2026 - 31JAN2029

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in this article may be made available upon reasonable request, subject to review and approval by the study sponsor, execution of a data use agreement, and in accordance with participant consent and applicable privacy and data protection requirements.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Crohn Disease

Clinical Trials on Vedolizumab

Subscribe