Effects of a Supervised Rehabilitation Program on Disease Severity in Spastic Ataxias

February 7, 2024 updated by: Elise Duchesne, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi

IMPACT, a Supervised Rehabilitation Program for Spastic Ataxias: A Rater-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

Spastic ataxias are a group of diseases causing symptoms such as walking difficulties and balance impairments that lead to a high risk of falls. No pharmacological treatments exist to treat these diseases. Unfortunately, little effort is made to develop non-pharmacological treatments specific to spastic ataxias despite the detrimental impact of the disease on several aspects of an individual's life and the high cost of falls for society each year. The three objectives of this project are: 1) to determine the effect of a 12-week rehabilitation program on disease severity as compared with usual care for individuals with spastic ataxias; 2) to identify which factors can help (or not) the implementation of the program in the clinical settings ("reel world"); and 3) to explore the cost-benefits of IMPACT [rehabIlitation prograM for sPAstiC aTaxias]. The team has developed the program to specifically target symptoms present in these patients and was previously pilot-tested. Based on the results obtained in this pilot project, positive effects are expected concerning the disease severity of participants. The investigators want, with this project, provide to health care professionals an option to offer better-suited services to people living with spastic ataxia worldwide.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Elise Duchesne, Ph D.
  • Phone Number: 418-590-3552
  • Email: educhesn@uqac.ca

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Baie-Saint-Paul, Quebec, Canada, G3Z 0K3
      • La Malbaie, Quebec, Canada, G5A 1T1
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H2H 2N8
      • Québec, Quebec, Canada, G1M 2S8
        • CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, installation IRDPQ
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Xavier Rodrigue, M.D.
        • Contact:
          • Élise Duchesne, Ph. D.
          • Phone Number: 418-590-3552
      • Saguenay, Quebec, Canada, G7X 7X2
        • Clinique des maladies neuromusculaires du Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux (CIUSSS) du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, installation Hôpital Jonquière
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jean-Denis Brisson, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • have a confirmed genetic diagnosis of ARSACS or SPG7
  • be able to maintain standing position and to transfert
  • be authorized by their treating neurologist
  • speak French or English
  • be able to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have active participation in a rehabilitation program (self-reported information)
  • have another condition causing physical limitations
  • be uncomfortable in a swimming pool
  • be pregnant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
The control group will receive their usual care and will be asked to continue their usual activities and exercises for the whole project duration. Only one clinical guide exists for ataxia interventions and no specific guidelines for physiotherapy and occupational therapy interventions are specified in this guide in terms of frequency, duration and type of interventions that are effective with this population. Patients generally have an annual follow-up with a doctor or a clinical nurse at a Neuromuscular Diseases Clinic. Patients are then referred if needed for follow-up with the physiotherapist and occupational therapist. Typically, patients are referred to physiotherapy for mobility-related needs such as the introduction of a walking aid, orthotic and sometimes teaching an exercise program. In occupational therapy, patients are referred for needs such as the introduction of technical aids, home adaptation or the introduction of a wheelchair.
Experimental: Intervention group
The intervention group will follow a 12-week rehabilitation program, 3 times a week (two sessions in a therapy room and one session of aquatherapy).
The rehabilitation program will last 12 weeks and consists of three training sessions of 60 minutes per week (2 sessions in a therapy room and 1 session in an adapted pool with multiple levels of water) for a total of 36 sessions. Participants will be divided into 7 subgroups of 6 participants and each sub-group will be supervised by one physiotherapist (PT) and one physiotherapy technologist for safety considerations. It will focus on these three domains: 1) postural control; balance, trunk-limbs and multi-joints control and coordination and 3) functional mobility. Each domain contains a standardized list of exercises with different difficulty levels and specific times allocation. All exercises will be executed by the participants at each session at the appropriate difficulty level. The initial level of difficulty for each exercise will be determined by the PT based on individual results of the pre-intervention assessment and on individual performance, fatigue level and safety.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of ataxia
Time Frame: 64 weeks

The severity of ataxia assessed using the Scale for the assessment and rating of Ataxia (SARA) has been chosen as the main variable based on several considerations. 1) it is one of the most widely used scales among recessive cerebellar ataxias in intervention studies, 2) it includes lower limbs motor impairments-induced mobility limitations items, 3) is significantly correlated with key impairments variables such as standing balance and walking speed, 4) and is a candidate for outcome measurement in foreseeable clinical trials.

It has eight categories with accumulative score ranging from 0 (no ataxia) to 40 (most severe ataxia) It showed evidence of adequate content validity and excellent construct validity and internal consistency in ARSACS and we recently validated the French version.

64 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medication change
Time Frame: 64 weeks
Patients will be asked about the possibility of changing their medication. A list of medications will also be provided by the pharmacy.
64 weeks
Weight
Time Frame: 64 weeks
Patients weight in kilograms
64 weeks
height
Time Frame: 64 weeks
Patients height in meters
64 weeks
Physical activities
Time Frame: 64 weeks

The Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA) is a questionnaire used to assess physical activity levels.

Each question has a 'Yes' or 'No' option. The total score of the first seven items is out of 7; participants choose which question corresponds to their activity level. Any score less than 6 is considered suboptimal. Strength training and flexibility are scored separately (strength training = 1, flexibility = 2, both = 3)

64 weeks
Walking speed.
Time Frame: 64 weeks
The 10-meter walk test will be used to assess the short-distance walking speed at comfortable and maximum speeds. The validity and reliability of the 10mWT are both excellent in ARSACS (ICC = 0.99).
64 weeks
Standing balance
Time Frame: 64 weeks

Berg balance scale will be used to assess balance and risk of falling. Its validity has been demonstrated in ARSACS.18 Participants' level of confidence in their balance will be assessed using the simplified balance confidence scale specific to daily activities

It has 14 (0-4) categories with accumulative score ranging from 0 to 56. Interpretation: 0-20, wheelchair bound; 21-40, walking with assistance; 41-56, independent.

64 weeks
Balance confidence
Time Frame: 64 weeks
Activities specific balance confidence-simplified (ABC-S) scale will aslo be use to assess balance (0-3 likert scale) This questionnaire includes 15 evaluation items, rated from 0 (not at all confident) to 3 (very confident), according to the person's confidence in maintaining their balance when performing various activities. The total score ranges from 0 (minimum confidence) to 45 (maximum confidence), and is obtained by adding together the scores for each item and converting them into a percentage.
64 weeks
Sitting balance
Time Frame: 64 weeks

Sitting balance and trunk control will be assessed with the Ottawa sitting scale (OSS).

The first six items are tested with the participant's feet on the ground ( /24) and the next six with the feet off the ground ( /24). The total score is calculated by adding together the scores for the two subsections (maximum score out of /48).

64 weeks
Activities of Daily Living
Time Frame: 64 weeks
The Barthel Index will assess the level of independence in performing daily living activities.
64 weeks
Muscle tone
Time Frame: 64 weeks

Lower limb muscle tone (spasticity) will be measured with the modified Ashworth scale.

Score each muscle group evaluated according to the table below. *Scoring is performed within the available range of motion. 0: No increase in muscle tone. 1: Discrete increase in muscle tone manifested by a twitch followed by release or by minimal resistance at the end of the movement. 1+: Discrete increase in muscle tone manifested by a twitch followed by minimal resistance perceived over less than half the joint amplitude. 2: More marked increase in muscle tone affecting most of the joint amplitude, the joint being easily mobilized. 3: Significant increase in muscle tone making passive mobilization difficult. 4: Affected joint is fixed (no passive movement possible).

64 weeks
Life habits
Time Frame: 64 weeks
The Assessment of Life Habits Questionnaire 4.0. (LIFE-H) was used to assess participation. It includes a total of 96 activities with one total score, two subscores (daily activities and social activities) and 12 domains divided equally between both subscores. For each activity, the level of accomplishment, type of assistance required and level of satisfaction are rated. Accomplishment includes the difficulty level and assistance required: a mean score of "0" refers to a complete disruption of participation (i.e. activity not accomplished), and "10" refers to full participation (i.e. activity accomplished without difficulty and assistance). The satisfaction level is measured on a 4-point scale, where a higher score indicates higher satisfaction ("4"). For the 3.0 version, a change of 0.5 (/9) is considered a minimal clinically important difference but is not documented for the version 4.0.
64 weeks
Community mobility
Time Frame: 7 consecutives days, 2 times
The daily rest-activity pattern will be assessed using an ActiGraph wGT3X-BT activity monitor worn on the nondominant arm for 7 consecutive days before and after the intervention period. Intradaily variability and interdaily stability (IS), M10 (most active 10-hours), L5 (least active 5-hours), and relative amplitude (RA) will be derived using nonparametric rhythm analysis. The patient's perception of mobility limitations will be measured by the Life Space Assessment questionnaire.
7 consecutives days, 2 times
Plasma
Time Frame: 64 weeks
3 x 10ml EDTA tubes will be collected to obtain 6 x 0.5ml cryovials of plasma (protein)
64 weeks
DNA
Time Frame: 64 weeks
3 x 10ml EDTA tubes will be collected to obtain 3 x 2ml cryovials of Buffy Coat (DNA).
64 weeks
Serum
Time Frame: 64 weeks
3 x 5ml SST serum tubes will be collected to obtain 12 x 0.5ml serum (protein) cryovials.
64 weeks
RNA
Time Frame: 64 weeks
3 PAXgene 2.5ml tubes (RNA) will be collected and frozen as is.
64 weeks
Urine
Time Frame: 64 weeks
10 ml of urine will be collected and separated into 12 cryovials of 0.5 ml.
64 weeks
Saliva
Time Frame: 64 weeks
12 ml of saliva will be collected to obtain 12 cryovials of 0.5 ml.
64 weeks
Mobility Life-space
Time Frame: 64 weeks

Life-Space Assessment (LSA-F) is a 20-items questionnaire measures the extent of mobility, taking into account the person's interactions with the environment. It assesses mobility habits in five living environments: the rooms of the home (or living unit for people living in sheltered housing), the surroundings of the home (or living unit/housing environment), the neighborhood, the city and outside the city.

Mobility area - Composite score, which is obtained by combining the level of mobility area achieved, the frequency of travel in each mobility area and the assistance required (technical aid and/or assistance of a person) to get there. The score ranges from 0 to 120, where 120 corresponds to an unrestricted mobility area.

64 weeks
Ataxia impact scale
Time Frame: 64 weeks
Person-reported ataxia impact scale (PRAIS) is self-administered questionnaire consists of 38 questions and aims to understand the impact of ataxia on daily life. A score out of 100 results.
64 weeks
Lower limb coordination
Time Frame: 64 weeks
It will be measured using the Lower Extremity Motor Coordination Test. It is a reliable tool in ARSACS (ICC = 0.82-0.99).
64 weeks
Peak respiratory flow and cough
Time Frame: 64 weeks
Peak expiratory flow (PEF) is the maximum speed at which air can be expelled from the lungs during forced expiration.
64 weeks
Fatigue
Time Frame: 64 weeks
Fatigue will be assess with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) This scale is a method of assessing the impact of fatigue on the subject. It is a short questionnaire that assesses the level of fatigue. The questionnaire contains nine statements that assess the severity of fatigue symptoms on a 7-level likert scale and produce a score between 9 and 63. A high score is a sign of fatigue
64 weeks
Falls.
Time Frame: 64 weeks
The fall history with and without injury will be self-reported according to the recommendations of the group of Elley et al. Participants will have to complete every day a fall logbook and a research assistant will contact them each month to document the circumstances and consequences of falls including injuries and medical consultations.
64 weeks
Patient-reported impression of change.
Time Frame: 64 weeks
The patients-global impression of change will be used (3 questions, 7-level Likert self-reported scale) to assess the impression of change.It is sensitive to change. This questionnaire gives the patient's perception. The higher the score, the worse the situation.
64 weeks
Anxiety and Depression
Time Frame: 64 weeks

Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale will assess anxiety and Depression

The HADS is a screening instrument for anxiety and depressive disorders. It comprises 14 items rated from 0 to 3. Seven questions relate to anxiety (total A) and seven to depression (total D), giving two scores (maximum score for each = 21).

64 weeks
Pain characteristics
Time Frame: 64 weeks
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form
64 weeks
Functional lower extremity strength
Time Frame: 64 weeks
The 30CST is a measurement that assesses functional lower extremity strength. The total number of correctly performed sit-to-stand repetitions is counted. If the participant is more than halfway upright when the 30 seconds have elapsed, count this as a repetition. If the participant is unable or unwilling to perform the test correctly, enter "0 repetitions" for each trial on the scoring sheet. The validity of the result of each test must be entered on the scoring sheet (valid or invalid).
64 weeks
Focus group with intervention group participants
Time Frame: 1 day
Each participant will take part in one focus group after the rehabilitation program. Also, a semi-structured interview guide covering the 7 dimensions of the TFA will be used.
1 day
Focus groups with stakeholders
Time Frame: 12 weeks
One focus group per site will be conducted before and after the intervention. In addition, during the rehabilitation program, each PT will be asked to fill out a journal of observations every week that includes the CFIR intervention items. In addition, the Determinant of Implementation Behavior. Questionnaire will be administered to PT and assistants at T0 and T3.
12 weeks
Lower limb muscle activation
Time Frame: 64 weeks
It will be measured using surface EMG. Surface myoelectric signals will be recorded at 2000 HZ using a 16-channel wireless system (Trigno™ EMG, Delsys, MA, USA).
64 weeks
Quality of life
Time Frame: 64 weeks
Quality of life will be assessed with SF-12 is a generic questionnaire that assesses health-related quality of life from the participant's point of view. It can be self-administered or completed during an interview. It comprises 12 assessment items, divided into 7 domains. The scoring system provides two quality-of-life scores (0 to 100: poor to excellent), i.e., a subtotal for mental and social quality of life (MCS) and a subtotal for physical quality of life (PCS).
64 weeks
CBA analyses and Willingness to pay
Time Frame: 64 weeks
Estimating the costs related to the use of health services, falls with and without injuries, and improvement in quality of life and our health indicators (main and secondary outcomes). Using data collected in medical records and the hospitalization data, we will use different variables to take into account the use of health services such as: 1) visits physicians or health care professionals; 2) home visits by home-care professionals; and 3) emergency or hospital stays. We will also use the project's information relative to the cost of the rehabilitation program such as: 1) the number of hours of assessments and supervision of the program/type of professional and 2) the hourly rate of professionals. The cost of setting up a rehabilitation program will be estimated by combining human and material resources.
64 weeks
Gait's temporal parameters
Time Frame: 64 weeks
The GAITRite system is a 14ft carpet containing sensors activated by pressure exerted by the feet and providing x and y coordinates. Then, the footprint analysis can provides the gait temporal parameters such as step time, step length, cadence and speed.
64 weeks
Stance balance
Time Frame: 64 weeks
Force platform
64 weeks
Postural balance
Time Frame: 64 weeks
Postural balance will be assess with the wobble chair. This test measures the postural balance of the trunk during a balance task in a seated position on an unstable chair, where only movements of the lumbar spine are allowed to restore balance.
64 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All information collected as part of this research project, as research data including biological material, will be stored securely in the data bank Banque de données et de matériel biologique des maladies neuromusculaires et autres maladies et conditions apparentées (BDMB-MNM-MCA).

All research data of participants, including biological material, will be used by researchers to carry out research projects on neuromuscular and related diseases.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The research data will be kept for as long as it is useful for the advancement of scientific knowledge. These data will be share of other researchers around the world.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

All these research projects will first be evaluated and approved by the Research Ethics Committee : Comité de recherche du Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean. Also, this commitee make the follow-up for these research projects.

The principal investigator of this research will respect privacy and confidentiality regulations in Quebec and in Canada for any sharing data research with other authorized persons in any countries.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on SPG7

Clinical Trials on IMPACT - rehabIlitation prograM for sPAstiC aTaxias

3
Subscribe