Automated Screening for Clinically Ascertained Loss of Cerebral Functions (DETECT-IVE)

March 1, 2024 updated by: Kristian Barlinn, Technische Universität Dresden

Automated Screening for Clinically Ascertained Loss of Cerebral Functions in Patients With Severe Brain Damage - an Interventional Cluster Randomized Trial (DETECT-IVE)

Rationale: The low organ donation rate in Germany is associated with the inadequate identification of patients at risk of developing irreversible loss of brain function (ILBF; i.e. brain death). An automated digital screening tool, DETECT (AutomateD ScrEening for Clinically AscerTainEd Loss of Cerebral FuncTions in Patients with Severe Brain Damage), has been developed to prospectively identify intensive care patients who are at risk of developing ILBF.

Objective: The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an automated digital screening tool in the identification of patients with severe brain damage who are at risk of impending ILBF compared to standard practice without digital support.

Study design: Stepped-Wedge, multicenter, cluster-randomized, controlled trial

Study population: The study includes patients aged 18 years or older with primary and/or secondary acute brain damage, requiring mechanical ventilation, and who are deceased upon hospital discharge.

Intervention: DETECT periodically processes real-time data from the corresponding electronic medical record system to screen for a combination of coma, indicated by a Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) score of - 4 or - 5 or Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 6-3, along with manually assessed absence of bilateral pupillary light reflexes. Both findings are considered early indicators of impending ILBF. In case of positive screening results, an automated notification will be sent via the hospital's email server to the corresponding transplant coordinators and intensivists. The email sent aims to prompt clinical assessment of the reported patient and, if necessary, initiate a guideline-based ILBF examination.

Primary study endpoint: The primary endpoint is the identification of patients who eventually develop ILBF during hospitalization.

Secondary study endpoints: Secondary outcomes encompass the missed identification of potential ILBF cases (as retrospectively classified) and the rate of deceased organ donations. Upon completion of the study, a survey will be conducted to investigate the stakeholders' experiences with DETECT.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

4800

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Dresden, Germany, 01307
        • Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary and/or secondary acute brain damage
  • At least 18 years or older
  • Necessity of mechanical ventilation
  • Deceased upon hospital discharge

Exclusion Criteria:

• none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control
Conventional care alone
Conventional care
Experimental: DETECT
DETECT in addition to conventional care will be initiated according to randomization plan
Conventional care
DETECT periodically processes real-time data from the corresponding electronic medical record system to screen for a combination of coma, indicated by a Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) score of - 4 or - 5 or Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 6-3, along with manually assessed absence of bilateral pupillary light reflexes. Both findings are considered early indicators of impending ILBF. In case of positive screening results, an automated notification will be sent via the hospital's email server to the corresponding transplant coordinators and intensivists. The email sent aims to prompt clinical assessment of the reported patient and, if necessary, initiate a guideline-based ILBF examination.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with diagnosis of ILBF
Time Frame: 30 months
The primary outcome is defined as proportion of patients with an eventual diagnosis of ILBF in accordance with the guidelines of the German Medical Association during hospitalization.
30 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients who undergo deceased organ donation
Time Frame: 30 months
The secondary outcome is defined as proportion of patients who undergo deceased organ donation.
30 months
Number of patients in whom diagnosis of ILBF was missed
Time Frame: 30 months
The secondary outcome is defined as the failure to identify potential cases of ILBF. This outcome measure will be determined through retrospective evaluation of all deceased cases who were not diagnosed with ILBF during hospitalization. For this purpose, independent neurointensivists will review computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging scans for findings indicative of critical intracranial pressure such as severe hypoxic cerebral edema, intracerebral hemorrhage with intraventricular extension or space-occupying hemispheric infarction, in addition to clinical information. The final decision regarding the potential development of ILBF will be based on consensus between two neurointensivists.
30 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kristian Barlinn, MD, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

March 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

March 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Irreversible Loss of Brain Function (ILBF)

Clinical Trials on Conventional care

Subscribe