Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Dec-FB4 and FB4 as Conditioning Regimen for AML-MR

June 2, 2024 updated by: Hu Xiaoxia, Ruijin Hospital

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine-Fludarabine-busulfan (Dec-FB4) and Fludarabine-busulfan (FB4) as Conditioning Regimens for AML-MR

A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical study comparing the efficacy and safety of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with decitabine-Fludarabine- busulfan (Dec-FB4) and Fludarabine-busulfan (FB4) as pretreatment regimens for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in adults with MR gene abnormalities

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

AML-MR is one of high-risk AML with aggressive disease progression and poor prognosis. The median survival of AML-MR is only 10.5 months. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an effective post-remission therapy for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Selection of an appropriate pretreatment regimen that balances the risk of relapse and reduces the risk of non-relapse mortality is a key component of successful HSCT. FB4 regimen consisting of Fludarabine (FLU) combined with busulfan (BU) has become the most commonly used myeloablative preconditioning regimen for allo-HSCT in patients with AML/MDS, and prospective studies have demonstrated a similar relapse rate and lower treatment-related mortality than the Bu/cy regimen.

Decitabine is also approved for the treatment of AML and MDS as an inhibitor of DNA methyltransferase I, which allows for the expression of silenced oncogenes and terminal differentiation of leukemia cells, and as a single agent is superior to supportive therapy for patients with MDS. In addition, decitabine has been shown to attenuate GVHD by enhancing the function of regulatory T cells, and in myeloid tumors, several prospective single-arm and retrospective clinical studies have demonstrated that modified pretreatment regimens containing decitabine have a lower relapse rate, as well as a reduction in the incidence and severity of GVHD, with satisfactory survival data in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The investigators have not yet obtained direct evidence in high-risk patients to confirm the superiority of decitabine-containing pretreatment regimens over standard pretreatment regimens (FB4). There is a lack of prospective, controlled studies to clarify the efficacy and safety of decitabine-containing transplantation preconditioning in high-risk patients, especially those with specific AML-MR.Therefore, this multicenter, randomized controlled study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of Dec-FB4 and FB4 regimens as pretreatment regimens for allogeneic HSCT in adults with AML-MR and to assess whether Dec-FB4 is superior or noninferior to FB4, in order to provide a reliable evidence-based medical basis for guiding the therapeutic choices for AML-MR/MDS patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

220

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China, 200025

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 16-65 years and with an ECOG physical fitness score of 0-2 and an HCT-CI of less than 3;
  • Diagnosis: All enrolled cases were diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML-MR) after bone marrow cytomorphology, cytochemistry, immunophenotyping, chromosomal examination, and gene mutation, and achieved hematological remission (bone marrow smear primitive cells <5%) and negative MRD before transplantation.
  • Have a medically qualified and suitable hematopoietic stem cell donor, including HLA-allogamous sibling donors, unrelated donors (HLA high-resolution 9-10/10 compatible) or related haploidentical donors;
  • No dysfunction of the heart, liver, lungs, kidneys, or other important organs, as defined as follows: ALT and AST ≤3 times the upper limit of normal; total bilirubin ≤2 times the upper limit of normal); BUN and Cr ≤1.25 times the upper limit of normal; electrocardiograms not suggestive of acute myocardial infarction or serious arrhythmias; cardiac echocardiography left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%, no significant cardiac enlargement, valvular disease, or congenital heart disease; pulmonary function examination FEV1, FVC, DLCO ≥ 60% of the predicted value.
  • The patient and his/her legal representative have the desire and requirement to undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and sign an informed consent, willingness and compliance with the treatment plan, follow-up schedule, laboratory tests, etc.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • AML in unremitting stage; or BM in remission but with concurrent CNS leukemia or presence of extramedullary lesions;
  • Active hepatitis B (HBV-DNA ≥1×10^3 copies/ml);
  • HIV-infected patients;
  • Active infections requiring intravenous antibiotic therapy;
  • There is severe impairment of vital organ function: respiratory failure, heart failure, decompensated hepatic insufficiency, renal insufficiency, etc;
  • Patients who use drugs or chronic alcohol abuse to the extent that it interferes with the evaluation of test results;
  • Mentally challenged/unable to obtain informed consent;
  • Those judged by the investigator to be unsuitable for participation in this trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Flu-Bu4
Preconditioning with Flu-Bu4 without decitabine for patients with AML-MR
fludarabine 30mg/m2 per day for consecutive 5 days
Busulfan 3.2mg/kg per day for consecutive 4 days
Experimental: Dec-Flu-Bu4
Preconditioning with Flu-Bu4 and decitabine for patients with AML-MR
fludarabine 30mg/m2 per day for consecutive 5 days
Busulfan 3.2mg/kg per day for consecutive 4 days
decitabine 20mg/m2 per day for consecutive 5 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
disease-free survival
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
disease progression or death as a result of any causes
through study completion, an average of 2 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
incidence of relapse rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
disease relapse
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Non-recurrent mortality
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
death without disease progression or relapse
through study completion, an average of 2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xiaoxia HU, Ruijin Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on AML, Adult

Clinical Trials on Fludarabine Injection

Subscribe