Clinical Outcomes and Decision-making Choice of Skull Base Approaches for Petroclival Meningiomas

Clinical Outcomes and Decision-making Choice of Skull Base Approaches for Petroclival Meningiomas: a Single Center Report of 179 Cases

Petroclival meningioma (PCM) is a technically challenging lesion. We aimed to analyze the role of various skull base approaches and evaluate the therapeutic outcomes guided by the modified classification. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics, surgical approaches, outcomes and follow-up data from 179 cases of PCM from January 2011 to December 2020. We modified the previous classification into updated five types with two subtypes: clivus type (CV), petroclival type (PC), petroclivosphenoidal type (PC-S), sphenopetroclival type (S-PC) with two subtypes of S-PC I and S-PC II and central skull base type (CSB). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistical Package 21.0. The t-test was performed to clinical data comparisons between the two groups and the ANOVA test was used to compare the difference between multiple groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  1. Study Design and Ethics Approval In this institutional study, 179 cases of PCM were retrospectively collected and analyzed from January 2011 to December 2020 in our neurosurgical department, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University (approval no. 202103227) in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Patients provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
  2. Evaluative Criteria Clinical characteristics with manifestation, neurological function status, neuroimaging and surgical records, and follow-up data were reviewed and evaluated. The preoperative, postoperative and follow-up QOL were assessed and measured using the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score by two neurosurgeons, independently, on admission, discharge, and follow-up, correspondingly. The preoperative radiological data were obtained from routine examination of brain 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with T1-weighted, T2-weighted and T1-contrast-enhanced sequences, computed tomography angiography (CTA) and skull base high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans to evaluate tumor size, origin of dural attachment, growth pattern, involved circumjacent range, brainstem displacement, peritumoral edema, encasement of vital neurovascular structure and hydrocephalus to further identify tumor classification and treatment strategy. All of cases were re-examined with contrast MRI to identify the EOR within 72 hours post-operative. The EOR was divided into three levels of gross total resection (GTR) (Simpson Grades I/II), subtotal resection (STR) (Simpson Grades III/IV, with 90-99% excision of the lesion) and partial resection (PR) (Simpson III/IV, with below 90% excision of the lesion), depending on the intraoperative identification and postoperative MRI.

    A combination of outpatient, telephone and Internet connections were used for follow-up. Follow-up data, including clinical and radiographic information, was collected 3 and 6 months after the surgical procedure and then every 1 or 2 years, in most cases via clinic visits. Questionnaires and phone calls were also carried out. The tumor recurrence or progress (R/P) meant lesion regrowth in situ in GTR cases or residual lesion regrowth with the increase of the maximal diameter more than 3 mm in STR/PR cases. Those who experienced tumor R/P were recommended for additional treatment. The latest follow-up deadline is March 1, 2021.

  3. PCM Classification On the basis of the variation of PCM pathological alteration in anatomy and with the accumulating experience and incisive comprehension to PCM, we modified and improved our previous tumor classification into updated five types with two subtypes: clivus type (CV), petroclival type (PC), petroclivosphenoidal type (PC-S), sphenopetroclival type (S-PC) with two subtypes of S-PC I and S-PC II and central skull base type (CSB).
  4. Skull Base Approach Choice The skull base approach choice was fundamentally followed by the modified classification. At the same time, the patient's age, request and physical condition cannot be ignored. In this study, the retrosigmoid approach (RSA), subtemporal transtentorial transpetrosal approach (STTA), extended pterional transtentorial approach (EPTA), pretemporal trancavernous anterior transpetrosal approach (PTCA) and presigmoid combined supra-infratentorial approach (PCA) were applied as the main surgical approaches. Moreover, the RSA included basic retrosigmoid approach (BRSA), retrosigmoid trantentorial approach (RTTA) and retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach (RISA). Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring containing somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), motor evoked potentials (MEP) and brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) were essentially and routinely implemented.
  5. Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistical Package 21.0. The t-test was performed to clinical data comparisons between the two groups and the ANOVA test was used to compare the difference between multiple groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

179

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410000
        • Xiangya Hospital, Central South University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

In this institutional study, 179 cases of PCM were retrospectively collected and analyzed from January 2011 to December 2020 in our neurosurgical department, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. This study enrolled 28 males and 151 females with a male to female ratio of 1:5.4 and average age of 49.9±10.2 years (range 15-73 years). A total of 16 cases (8.9%) had been treated in other hospitals preoperatively with 12 cases of prior operations and 4 cases of prior gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosed as the PCM from the MRI follwoed the definition of PCM.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. combined with serious chronic diseases leading to inoperable therapy; 2. the partient refused to recevie surgical therapy; 3. combined with other cancers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Clivus type
The dural attachment originates from petroclival fissure, and the main portion of lesion is situated on middle-upper clivus, mainly grows toward the median line and even the heterolateral direction, could involve in the whole clivus region from dorsum sellae to foramen magnum.
The skull base approach choice was fundamentally followed by the modified classification.
Petroclival type
The dural attachment originates likewise from petroclival fissure, but primarily extends toward the homolateral dorsal petrosum region, and the main portion is center on middle-upper clivus and grows toward petrous apex region forward and cerebellopontine angle region backward, leading to the homolateral trigeminus being compressed outwards.
The skull base approach choice was fundamentally followed by the modified classification.
Petroclivosphenoidal type
The site of origin lies on petroclival region, while the main part of lesion is located in posterior cranial fossa and extends forward and upward along petroclival fissure, and could spread to posterior clinoid process, dorsum sellae and parasellar area with striding petrous ridge, or expanding into Meckel's cave (MC) and even reaching posterior wall of cavernous sinus (CS) through MC. Overall, the growth pattern direction is basically from posterior cranial fossa to middle cranial fossa and from the infratentorial to supratentorial compartment.
The skull base approach choice was fundamentally followed by the modified classification.
The skull base approach choice was fundamentally followed by the modified classification.
Sphenopetroclival Subtype I
Sphenopetroclival type (S-PC type): The site of origin saddles the petrous ridge and invades the CS and parasellar region widely. The growth pattern is different from the PC-S type, mainly from the middle cranial fossa to the posterior cranial fossa. This type is then further classified into two subtypes based on the relationship between CS and the lesion site of origin. Subtype I (S-PC I type): The lesion mainly originates from posterior part of CS and posterior clinoid process region, could invade and break though the CS wall, and the main part of lesion expands towards parasellar, middle cranial fossa, and petrous apex, even invades the dorsum sellae and posterior cranial fossa through tentorium. As a result, the CS wall is mostly rough, and the dural space between the lesion and the temporal lobe is not well-defined on MRI.
The skull base approach choice was fundamentally followed by the modified classification.
The skull base approach choice was fundamentally followed by the modified classification.
Sphenopetroclival Subtype II
The dural attachment of lesion entirely originates within the CS leading to CS region expansile hyperplasia with the virtually intact sinus wall, and part of lesion could spread into the petrous apex and posterior cranial fossa through posterior sinus wall; the large partial lesions may also encroach on the lateral wall of the CS expansion towards the middle cranial fossa. The lateral sinus wall is relatively smooth and maintains the dural space between the lesion and the temporal lobe on MRI.
The skull base approach choice was fundamentally followed by the modified classification.
The skull base approach choice was fundamentally followed by the modified classification.
Central Skull Base type
The dural attachment originates from the petroclival fissure, but growth pattern is widespread invasion of central skull base region and structures bilaterally and the site of origin extensively involves in dorsum sellae, clivus and bilateral suprasellar, parasellar and CS areas even cerebellopontine angle region.
The skull base approach choice was fundamentally followed by the modified classification.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
QOL were assessed and measured using the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score
Time Frame: an average of 1 year
QOL were assessed and measured using the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score by two neurosurgeons, independently, on admission, discharge, and follow-up, correspondingly. Follow-up KPS score was collected through study completion, an average of 1 year, in most cases via clinic visits.
an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Qing Liu, MD, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 27, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 10, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 10, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

When the research data has been published.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Skull Base Meningioma

Clinical Trials on retrosigmoid approach (RSA)

Subscribe