- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06329700
Parenchymal Sparing Hepatectomy in Post-chemotherapy Liver Atrophy
March 19, 2024 updated by: Matteo Donadon, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita
Performance of Parenchymal Sparing Hepatectomy in Patients With CLM and Post-chemotherapy Liver Atrophy
Major hepatectomy in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) and post-chemotherapy liver atrophy is associated with increased complications.
Whether the performance of parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy (PSH) in those patients can be safer is unknown.
The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of post-chemotherapy liver atrophy on patients undergoing PSH for CLM.
For this purpose, the occurrence of liver atrophy was recorded and then computed against the occurrence of postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients affected by CLMs and trated with neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy and then hepatectomy were reviewed with the intent to assess the occurrence of liver atrophy, which is a sign of liver dysfunction and a source of morbidity expecially in patients treated with major or extended hepatectomy.
Whether the performance of parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy (PSH) in those patients can be safer is unknown.
Then, we planned to review our cases with the above mentioned endpoint.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
74
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients affected by colorectal liver metastases awaiting liver surgery, and receiving before surgery systemic chemotherapy (neoadjuvant).
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Consecutive patients with multiple CLMs treated with preoperative chemotherapy and parenchymal sparing surgery;
- Only patients with available volumetry of the pre- and post-chemotherapy abdominal enhanced computed tomography (CT) images;
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who underwent preoperative PVE;
- Patients treated by major hepatectomies; Patients treated with thermal ablation alone or in association with hepatic resection.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No post-chemotherapy liver atrophy
Patients treated with systemic chemotherapy, then hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.
No occurrence of post-chemotherapy liver atrophy as measured by computed-tomography liver volumetry.
|
Surgical removal of a part of the liver
Other Names:
|
|
Yes post-chemotherapy liver atrophy
Patients treated with systemic chemotherapy, then hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.
Yes, occurrence of post-chemotherapy liver atrophy as measured by computed-tomography liver volumetry.
|
Surgical removal of a part of the liver
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: From the date of surgery up to 90 days
|
Any adverse event after surgery
|
From the date of surgery up to 90 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Matteo Donadon, MD, PhD, University of Eastern Piedmont
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Yamashita S, Shindoh J, Mizuno T, Chun YS, Conrad C, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN. Hepatic atrophy following preoperative chemotherapy predicts hepatic insufficiency after resection of colorectal liver metastases. J Hepatol. 2017 Jul;67(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.01.031. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
- Omichi K, Yamashita S, Cloyd JM, Shindoh J, Mizuno T, Chun YS, Conrad C, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN, Tzeng CD. Portal Vein Embolization Reduces Postoperative Hepatic Insufficiency Associated with Postchemotherapy Hepatic Atrophy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Jan;22(1):60-67. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3467-1. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
- Torzilli G, Procopio F, Botea F, Marconi M, Del Fabbro D, Donadon M, Palmisano A, Spinelli A, Montorsi M. One-stage ultrasonographically guided hepatectomy for multiple bilobar colorectal metastases: a feasible and effective alternative to the 2-stage approach. Surgery. 2009 Jul;146(1):60-71. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.02.017.
- Tani K, Shindoh J, Takamoto T, Shibahara J, Nishioka Y, Hashimoto T, Sakamoto Y, Hasegawa K, Makuuchi M, Kokudo N. Kinetic Changes in Liver Parenchyma After Preoperative Chemotherapy for Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 May;21(5):813-821. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3359-4. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
June 30, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 19, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
March 26, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 26, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 19, 2024
Last Verified
March 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ParSparInLivAtrophy
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Yes, after reasonable request.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
After pubblication of the paper(s).
No limit in time.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Reasonable request to the PI or corresponsing author.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.