Simultaneous Care in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: the SupCare Study (SupCare)

This is a late phase II, prospective, multicenter randomized study, to assess the value of early palliative care integrated with the standard oncologic care in patients with Recurrent Metastatic (RM) Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) proposed to first line palliative systemic treatment.

The study randomizes patients in a 1:1 fashion to standard oncologic care, in which the palliative care is requested as needed (reactive approach) or to early palliative care integrated with the standard oncologic care (proactive approach).

Standard of Care: the oncologist will be the main referral of the patient, deciding the therapeutic approach, the assessments requested, in terms of type of exams and timing and the need of possible further support from other expertise. The oncologist will base the choices also upon the results of the Liverpool Head and Neck Patient Concern Inventory (PCI-H&N) and the patient's preferences. At the end of the first oncological visit, the physician will be asked to predict the survival of the patient.

Integrated approach: Besides the Oncology visit, patient will have the palliative care expert visit and follow up. The oncologist will define the therapeutic approach and the assessments requested, in terms of type of exams and timing. The palliative care clinician and the oncologist will judge the burden of symptoms and together they will propose the suggested interventions to relief the symptoms, with a particular attention to a validated instrument (the PCI-H&N) and patient priority questionnaire's results.

Stratification Factors

  • Institution
  • Performance Status (PS) (0 vs 1-2)
  • Presence of any caregiver at home
  • Type of treatment (Immunotherapy alone vs any other combination)

Study duration: the total study duration is estimated at 36 months, with a total accrual time estimated to be 24 months from first patient in (FPI) and with an additional follow-up period of 12 months.

End of study occurs when all patients have completed their end of study visit and the study is mature for all analyses defined in the protocol and the database has been cleaned and frozen for these analyses.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over 18 years of age
  • Histological diagnosis of HNC of epithelial origin. Any sub-site of head and neck is eligible except endocrine tumours such as thyroid and parathyroid cancer
  • First diagnosis of recurrent disease and/or distant metastasis; with recurrent disease not amenable to salvage surgery or re-irradiation
  • Patient candidate to any first line systemic treatment
  • Life expectancy more than 3 months
  • PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≤2
  • Adequate cognitive and reading abilities.
  • Availability of baseline scores for Emotional Functioning and Pain
  • Patient agrees to complete questionnaires at week 6, 15, 24 and 52 after systemic treatment start
  • Before patient 's enrolment, written informed consent must be given according to International Council for Harmonisation (ICH)/Good Clinical Practice (GCP), and national/local regulations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients requiring a palliative care consultation right from the beginning of treatment
  • Cutaneous primary cancer
  • Any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be assessed and discussed with the patient before the enrolment in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
The oncologist will be the main referral of the patient, deciding the therapeutic approach, the assessments requested, in terms of type of exams and timing and the need of possible further support from other expertise. The oncologist will base the choices also upon the results of the Liverpool Head and Neck Patient Concern Inventory (PCI-H&N) and the patient's preferences. At the end of the first oncological visit, the physician will be asked to predict the survival of the patient.
The oncologist will be the main referral of the patient, deciding the therapeutic approach, the assessments requested, in terms of type of exams and timing and the need of possible further support from other expertise (reactive approach). The oncologist will base the choices also upon the results of the PCI-H&N and the patient's preferences. At the end of the first oncological visit, the physician will be asked to predict the survival of the patient.
Experimental: Integrated Care
Besides the oncology visit, patient will have the palliative care expert visit and follow up. The oncologist will define the therapeutic approach and the assessments requested, in terms of type of exams and timing. The palliative care clinician and the oncologist will judge the burden of symptoms and together they will propose the suggested interventions to relief the symptoms, with a particular attention to a validated instrument (the PCI-H&N) and patient priority questionnaire's results.
Besides the Oncology visit, patient will have the palliative care expert visit and follow up (proactive approach). The oncologist will define the therapeutic approach and the assessments requested, in terms of type of exams and timing. The palliative care clinician and the oncologist will judge the burden of symptoms and together they will propose the suggested interventions to relief the symptoms, with a particular attention to the Liverpool Head and Neck Patient Concern Inventory (PCI-H&N) and patient priority questionnaire's results.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in emotional functioning and pain scores according to Item List (IL) 250 questionnaire at 15 weeks.
Time Frame: at 15 weeks

To assess the added value of early palliative care integrated with the standard oncologic care as measured by the difference in mean change from baseline to 15 weeks between arms in patient reported emotional functioning and pain.

Minimum = -100; Maximum = +100; higher means better outcome

at 15 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in emotional functioning and pain scores according to Item List 250 (IL250) questionnaire at 6 weeks, 24 weeks and 52 weeks.
Time Frame: at 6 weeks, 24 weeks and 52 weeks

Evaluate the added value of early palliative care integrated with the standard oncologic care as measured by the difference in mean change from baseline at alternative timepoints between arms in patient reported emotional functioning and pain.

Minimum = -100; Maximum = +100; higher means better outcome

at 6 weeks, 24 weeks and 52 weeks
Change from baseline in the selected Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) scales from the Item List 250 (IL250) questionnaire at 6 weeks, 15 weeks, 24 weeks and 52 weeks
Time Frame: at 6 weeks, 15 weeks, 24 weeks and 52 weeks

Evaluate the change from baseline in supportive patient-reported symptom and functional outcomes at 6 weeks, 15 weeks, 24 weeks and 52 weeks.

Minimum = -100; Maximum = +100; higher means better outcome

at 6 weeks, 15 weeks, 24 weeks and 52 weeks
Number of unplanned visits to emergency room or specialist visits
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
Evaluate the frequency of the unplanned access to emergency room or specialist visits
up to 52 weeks
Hospitalization due to treatment toxicities or tumour signs/symptoms, as evaluated by number of admissions and duration
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
Frequency of hospitalization due to adverse effects of treatment or due to tumour symptoms/signs
up to 52 weeks
Identification of the rate of patients starting a new systemic treatment in the last three months of life
Time Frame: until 1 year from last patient enrolled
Frequency of oncological treatments in last three months of life.
until 1 year from last patient enrolled
Rate of patients receiving systemic treatment in the last month of life
Time Frame: until 1 year from last patient enrolled
Identification of the rate of patients receiving systemic treatment in the last month of life
until 1 year from last patient enrolled
Rate of patients with a tracheostomy performed in the last 3 months of life
Time Frame: until 1 year from last patient enrolled
Identification of the rate of patients with tracheostomy performed in the last 3 months of life.
until 1 year from last patient enrolled
Rate of patients with gastrostomy performed in the last 3 months of life
Time Frame: until 1 year from last patient enrolled
Identification of the rate of patients with gastrostomy performed in the last 3 months of life.
until 1 year from last patient enrolled
Caregiver/family members' satisfaction (FAMcare questionnaire) at 15 weeks
Time Frame: at 15 weeks
Assessment of the caregiver/family members' satisfaction. Minimum = -99; Maximum = +99; higher means better outcome.
at 15 weeks
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: until 1 year from last patient enrolled
Overall Survival
until 1 year from last patient enrolled
Prediction error of survival (defined as the difference between actual survival (AS) of patients and clinician prediction of survival (CPS))
Time Frame: until 1 year from last patient enrolled
Accuracy of physician prediction of survival
until 1 year from last patient enrolled

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paolo Bossi, MD, Istituto Clinico Humanitas
  • Principal Investigator: Kathy Taylor, MSc, Universitätsmedizin Mainz - Institut fuer Medizinische -Biometrie, Epidemiologie und informatik
  • Principal Investigator: Luigi Lorini, MD, Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EORTC-2236-HNCG-QLG

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Head and Neck Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Palliative care requested as needed, integrated with the standard oncologic care (reactive approach)

Subscribe