Safety and Suitability of ICL for Correction of Refractive Errors Without the Use of Dispersive OVDs

November 16, 2024 updated by: Loay Abdulmutalib Almusawi

Safety and Suitability of Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) Implantation for Correction of Refractive Errors Without the Use of Dispersive Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices (OVDs)

The goal of this observational study is to test whether surgeries for lenses designed to be implanted in the eye to correct refractive error can be done without the need for using viscoelastic substances that are used routinely nowadays to make it easier to introduce them inside the human eye and protect the inside of the eye during the operation.

The main question it aims to answer is that is it safe to do the surgery without using them? to answer this question researchers will access recorded data of patients that underwent refractive surgeries in a private clinic since 2017 and compare them as two groups: those who underwent the traditional procedures and those who had it without the use of dispersive viscoelastics in regard to their vision before and after surgery, their ocular pressure and biomicroscopic analysis of the inside of their corneas before and after surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Records of patients that had undergone ICL implantation surgery in Al-Ferdows private eye hospital in Baghdad between 2017 and 2023 were accessed. Two groups of patients were identified, for the first group the ICL was implanted with the use of both dispersive and cohesive OVDs (traditional OVD group) and for the second one a novel method of implantation was used without utilizing dispersive OVD (reduced OVD) group. Both types of surgery were done by the same surgeon and in the same settings. The operative notes of the OVD group were as follows: under topical anesthesia if the ICL is toric, manual corneal marking is done in the sitting position using pendular marker. After loading of the ICL, two-step clear corneal main incision 2.8 mm in width with a bit long track of 1.5-2 mm to enhance its valve action was fashioned. Intracameral injection of dispersive OVD. The ICL was implanted with mouth-to-mouth technique. Anterior chamber reformation with cohesive OVD, then haptics are gently pushed behind the iris using an olive-tipped manipulator, ensuring alignment to proper axis in case of toric ICL, otherwise spherical ICL is placed directly at 180° axis. After that, AC (anterior chamber) wash with irrigation/aspiration is performed then stromal hydration was done to seal the surgical wound. In the reduced OVD group, modification to the traditional method involved omitting the step of dispersive OVD injection and instead utilizing Intracameral injection of 1:1 mixture of 1:1000 adrenaline and 2% lidocaine in an overfilling manner. All other surgical steps are performed in an identical manner.

The study was ethically approved by the institutional review committee at the respective hospital and a similar committee at the college of medicine of university of Basrah according to the local guidelines and protocols. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient before the surgery. The study followed tenets of declaration of Helsinki.

For both groups, records involving preoperative and postoperative assessments such as uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity, refractive error quantification both objectively utilizing an autorefractometer autorefractor Nidek ARK 1 (Nidek Inc, Gamagori, Japan) and subjectively as manifest refraction, clinical slit-lamp examination notes, intraocular pressure with non-contact air puff tonometer Topcon CT-1P (Topcon Inc., Tokyo, Japan), AC depth assessment by Pentacam Scheimpflug (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH Inc., Wetzlar, Germany), specular microscopy study of corneal endothelial cells (endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variation (CV) and hexagonality) using Topcon SP-1p Specular Microscope (Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), were accessed and analyzed using the latest software in SPSS. Patients with missing or incomplete data were excluded from the study. Exclusion criteria also included patients with severe ocular surface disease, unstable refraction, glaucoma, cataract, retinal detachment and uveitis. Unpaired t test or Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the two groups according to fulfilled statistical assumptions. Significance was considered at P value less than 0.05.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

448

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Baghdad, Iraq
        • Al-Ferdows private eye hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Records of patients that had undergone ICL implantation surgery in Al-Ferdows private eye hospital in Baghdad between 2017 and 2023 were accessed. Two groups of patients were identified, for the first group the ICL was implanted with the use of both dispersive and cohesive OVDs (traditional OVD group) and for the second one, a novel method of implantation was used without utilizing dispersive OVD (reduced OVD) group.

Description

  • Inclusion Criteria:
  • patients with refractive errors and stable refraction seeking refractive surgery who are fit for phakic IOL (intraocular lens) implantation and having reasonable improvement of visual acuity with refractive correction.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with severe ocular surface disease, unstable refraction, glaucoma, cataract, retinal detachment and uveitis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Traditional OVD group
In this group of patients, the ICL was implanted utilizing both cohesive and dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical device.
patients with refractive errors undergo surgical implantation of a lens inside the eye (implantable collamer lens or ICL) to correct these refractive errors. The procedure is done with help of use of both cohesive and dispersive OVD
Other Names:
  • ICL implantation traditional
  • Intraocular refractive surgery
Reduced OVD group
In this group of patients, the ICL was implanted with the use of cohesive OVD only.
patients with refractive errors undergo surgical implantation of a lens inside the eye (implantable collamer lens or ICL) to correct these refractive errors. The procedure is done with help of use of only cohesive OVD without using dispersive OVD.
Other Names:
  • Intraocular refractive surgery
  • ICL implantation reduced OVD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Unaided Visual Acuity After the Procedure
Time Frame: 1-2 years after the surgery
visual acuity (vision of the patient) without use of any glasses measured using LogMar charts. This measure has no specified units
1-2 years after the surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraocular Pressure Postoperatively
Time Frame: first day, first week and first month after the procedure
intraocular pressure in mmHg as measured by non-contact airpuff tonometer Topcon CT-1P (Topcon Inc., Tokyo, Japan). intraocular pressure is measured in millimeters of mercury
first day, first week and first month after the procedure
Specular Microscopy Parameter: Endothelial Cell Density
Time Frame: 1-2 years after the surgery
defined as the number of corneal endothelial cells per square millimeter of area, measured using the automated machine from Topcon SP-1P (Topcon Inc, Tokyo, Japan)
1-2 years after the surgery
Specular Microscopy Parameter: Endothelial Cells Hexagonality
Time Frame: 1-2 years after the surgery
defined as the percentage of endothelial cells having 6 borders and shaped like a hexagon. this measure reflects the overall health of the endothelial cells and decreased hexagonality below 58-60% indicates corneal enodthelial pleomorphism, also measured using the automated machine from Topcon SP-1P (Topcon Inc, Tokyo, Japan)
1-2 years after the surgery
Specular Microscopy Parameter: Coefficient of Variation of Corneal Endothelial Cells
Time Frame: 1-2 years after the surgery
The standard deviation of the mean cell area divided by the mean cell area gives the coefficient of variation, a unitless number that is normally less than 0.30. it reflects the health of endothelial cells and measured using the automated machine from Topcon SP-1P (Topcon Inc, Tokyo, Japan).
1-2 years after the surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Complications
Time Frame: any time post op within the maximum 2 years follow up period
such as glaucoma, cataract, persistent uveitis, macular edema, endophthalmitis..etc.
any time post op within the maximum 2 years follow up period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Sohaib A Mahmood, FIBMS, Ibn Al-Haithem eye teaching hospital
  • Study Director: Loay A Almusawi, FIBMS, University of Basrah

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 22, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 22, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractive Errors

Clinical Trials on phakic intraocular lens implantation traditional

Subscribe