Bupivacaine 0.125% Versus Bupivacaine 0.25% in Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Tympanomastoid Surgeries in Adults

May 6, 2024 updated by: Kareem Mohammed Assem Nawwar, Cairo University

The Efficacy of Bupivacaine 0.125% Versus Bupivacaine 0.25% in Superficial Cervical Plexus Block on Operative Field Visibility for Adults Undergoing Tympanomastoid Surgeries, A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Bleeding is one of the most common complications in tympanomastoid surgery that could prolong the time of operation and also might lead to morbidity. Pain is also one of the most annoying complications of tympanomastoid surgeries. Thus, adequate surgical field visualization is utmost important. A bloodless field allows optimal exposure and identification of vital neurovascular structures. Even small bleeding, inconsequential for the patient's volume status, can create great technical difficulty in the confined space of the tympan, leading to prolonged surgery, incomplete procedures, and increased complications.

The use of regional nerve blocks as an alternative to hypotensive anesthesia has gained popularity in recent years. The superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) provides effective analgesia and reduces sympathetic activity, resulting in reduced bleeding and improved surgical conditions. The superficial cervical plexus (SCP) provides sensory innervation to the ear and surrounding structures, reducing pain perception during and after surgery.

This is the first randomized controlled clinical trial investigating the effect of combined general anesthesia with SCPB using 0.125% versus 0.25% bupivacaine during tympanomastoid surgery.

This study aims to compare the efficacy of two different concentrations of bupivacaine 0.125% & 0.25% in Superficial Cervical Plexus Block in patients undergoing tympanomastoid surgery on operative field visualization, intraoperative hemodynamic stability, and postoperative analgesia.

The investigators hypothesize that bupivacaine 0.125% would be non-inferior to bupivacaine 0.25% in achieving optimal surgical field visualization, hemodynamic stability, surgeon satisfaction and postoperative analgesia.

This prospective double-blinded study will be carried out on 60 patients between 21 to 70 years, with ASA I-II and undergoing tympanomastoid surgery. Participants were equally divided into two groups: Group A: Patients received SCPB using 0.25% bupivacaine (5ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 5ml normal saline). Group B: Patients received SCPB using 0.125% bupivacaine (2.5ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 7.5ml normal saline).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • Faculty of medicine, Cairo University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults between 21 - 70 years.
  2. Patients undergoing tympanomastoid surgery.
  3. Both genders.
  4. ASA physical class I and II.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient refusal.
  2. Uncooperative patients.
  3. Allergy to the drug enrolled in the study.
  4. Anatomical abnormality at injection site.
  5. Infection at injection site.
  6. Bleeding disorders.
  7. ASA physical class III and IV patients.
  8. Patients having significant chronic diseases as: uncontrolled asthma, cardiovascular disorders (significant arrhythmias, severe valvular diseases, congenital heart diseases, ischemic heart disease, or cardiomyopathy).
  9. Renal impairment (creatinine level ≥ 2mg/dl), or uncompensated chronic liver disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Bupivacaine 0.25%
Patients will receive superficial cervical plexus block using 0.25% bupivacaine (5ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 5ml normal saline).
superficial cervical plexus block using 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%
Active Comparator: Bupivacaine 0.125%
Patients will receive superficial cervical plexus block using 0.125% bupivacaine (2.5ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 7.5ml normal saline).
superficial cervical plexus block using 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.125%

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The total consumption of IV glyceryl trinitrate
Time Frame: up to 5 hours
The total consumption of IV glyceryl trinitrate administered to maintain a surgical field with a Boezaart bleeding score ≤2 (grade 0 = no bleeding, grade 5 = severe bleeding threatening surgical field)
up to 5 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fentanyl consumption
Time Frame: up to 5 hours
Total intraoperative consumption of fentanyl
up to 5 hours
Postoperative hospital stay
Time Frame: 4 days
Duration of postoperative hospital stay in days
4 days
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: 1 hour postoperatively
Postoperative pain is measured by Visual Analog Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
1 hour postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Nevan M Mekawy, M.D., Professor of Anesthesiology, Surgical ICU & Pain Management, Cairo University
  • Study Director: Mohsen M Waheb, M.D., Lecturer of Anesthesiology, Surgical ICU & Pain Management, Cairo University
  • Study Director: Kareem MA Nawwar, M.D., Lecturer of Anesthesiology, Surgical ICU & Pain Management, Cairo University
  • Principal Investigator: Fatma A Mohamed Hassan, M.B.B.Ch., Resident of Anesthesia, Surgical ICU & Pain Management

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 28, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 5, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on bupivacaine 0.25%

Subscribe