Systemic Versus Local Dexmedetomidine As an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block

February 20, 2025 updated by: Soudy Salah Hammad, Aswan University

Systemic Versus Local Dexamedetomedine As an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block in Kidney Exploration Surgeries ,A Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this study is to investigate the analgesic effect of local versus systemic dexamedetomedine as adjuvant to bupivacaine in erector spinae block in kidney exploration surgeries.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Open Kidney surgeries remain one of the approaches used for those patients are requiring partial or radical nephrectomy and is associated with a high incidence of intense immediate postoperative pain and chronic pain for months following surgery.

Effective treatment of postoperative pain allows early mobilization of the patient, shortens the recovery and discharge time, prevents the development of chronic pain, and increases satisfaction and long-term quality of life.

Current modalities used to manage pain for patients undergoing kidney exploration include oral and parenteral opioid administration, local anesthetic infiltration, and certain neuraxial and regional anesthesia procedures including thoracic epidurals and paravertebral blocks.

The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a newer regional anesthetic technique that can be used to provide analgesia for a variety of surgical procedures or to manage acute or chronic pain. The technique is relatively easy to perform on patients, and it is performable with minimal or no sedation in the pre-operative holding area.

Ultrasound is a non-invasive visualization technology that helps capture the anatomical structure of target tissues; it can help guide the direction and depth of anesthesia puncture needles, thus reducing the risk of complications.

The local anesthetic drugs have a limited duration of action, so we need to add adjuvants such as opioids, alpha two agonists, neostigmine, or magnesium.

Dexmedetomidine is a potent α2 agonist and is a powerful adjuvant to regional anesthesia and analgesia. It can prolong the duration of the nerve block anesthesia resulting in increased effectiveness of the block in terms of duration, less use of opioids, and shorter hospital stay in the absence of clinically significant side effects (hypotension, nausea, vomiting, and pruritus.

Adding adjuvants to local anesthetics is frequently used to prolong the duration of single-injection regional nerve block.

There have been multiple studies claiming increased effectiveness of use of dexmedetomidine and this has been consolidated in a meta-analysis examining the effectiveness of dexamedetomedine as a peripheral nerve block adjuvant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

75

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Aswan, Egypt, 81511
        • Recruiting
        • Aswan University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Rehab A Mahmoud, MSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

•. kidney exploration surgeries.

  • ASA I/II patients.
  • BMI <35

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Getting opioid analgesics prior to surgery.
  • Local infections at the site where needle for block is to be inserted.
  • ASAIII/IV.
  • Pregnancy.
  • History of drug addiction or alcohol abuse or a psychiatric illness,

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group Ι Block only (group BO) (control group)
Ultrasound guided erector spinae block will receive 30 ml (28 ml bupivacaine 0.25% +2ml normal saline Na cl 0,9 %) +10ml IV normal saline will be injected over 10 min after 10 min from the induction of general anesthesia
.Group Ι Block only (group BO) (control group): erector spinae block will receive 30 ml ( 28 ml bupivacaine 0.25% +2ml normal saline Na cl 0,9 %) +10ml IV normal saline will be injected over 10 min after 10 min from the induction of general anesthesia
Active Comparator: Group ΙI (group DL):
Ultrasound guided erector spinae block will receive 30 ml (28 ml bupivacaine 0.25% plus dexmedetomidine (0.5µg/kg) diluted in 2ml normal saline Na cl 0,9%) + 10ml IV normal saline will be injected over 10 min after 10 min from the induction of general anesthesia
Group ΙI (group DL): erector spinae block will receive 30 ml (28 ml bupivacaine 0.25% plus dexamedetomedine (0.5µg/kg) diluted in 2ml normal saline Na cl 0,9% ) + 10ml IV normal saline will be injected over 10 min after 10 min from the induction of general anesthesia
Active Comparator: Group III (group D IV):
Ultrasound guided erector spinae block will receive 30 ml (28 ml bupivacaine 0.25% +2ml normal saline Na cl 0,9%) + dexmedetomidine (0.5µg/kg) diluted with 10 ml normal saline IV infusion by syringe pump over 10 min after 10 min from the induction of general anesthesia
Group III (group D IV): erector spinea block will receive 30 ml ( 28 ml bupivacaine 0.25% +2ml normal saline Na cl 0,9%) + dexamedetomedine (0.5µg/kg) diluted with 10 ml normal saline IV infusion by syringe pump over 10 min after 10 min from the induction of general anesthesia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The duration of analgesia, this was defined as the time in minutes to the first request for postoperative analgesics.
Time Frame: at 60 , 180 minutes
The duration of analgesia, this was defined as the time in minutes to the first request for
at 60 , 180 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
2. Total postoperative opioid consumption (Nalbuphine consumption (mg) within the 48-hour period .
Time Frame: at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours
2. Total postoperative opioid consumption (Nalbuphine consumption (mg) within the 48-hour period.
at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours
Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) (1: anxious; 2: cooperative and tranquil; 3: responding to command; 4: brisk response to stimuli; 5: sluggish response to stimuli; and 6: no response to stimuli) will be all assessed
Time Frame: at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours
amsay Sedation Scale (RSS) The RSS is a user-friendly and therefore commonly used sedation scale, with scores ranging from +4 (a violent dangerous patient) to -5 (an unarousable patient).6 A sedation score of 0 is most often therapeutically targeted, as it correlates with an alert and calm patient.
at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours
Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters blood pressure
Time Frame: at 1, 3, 6, hours
blood pressure measurement obtained by non-invasive blood pressure cuff during intraoperative and postoperative in PACU expressed in mmhg
at 1, 3, 6, hours
Minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) requirements
Time Frame: during intraoperative periods expressed in minutes
Minimum alveolar concentration or MAC is the concentration, often expressed as a percentage by volume, of a vapour in the alveoli of the lungs that is needed to prevent movement (motor response) in 50% of subjects in response to surgical (pain) stimulus.
during intraoperative periods expressed in minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Rehab A Mahmoud, MSc, Aswan University
  • Principal Investigator: Ayman M Eldemrdash, Aswan University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 25, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dexmedetomidine

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine Hydrochloride

Subscribe