Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine As an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia ; Peritoneal Symptomatic Effects

February 20, 2025 updated by: Soudy Salah Hammad, Aswan University

Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine As an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Spinal Anaesthesia for Appendectomy Patients; Peritoneal Symptomatic Effects: a Randomized Clinical Trial

To compare whether 5 μg dexmedetomidine with 25 μg fentanyl added to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine as adjuvants in spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing appendectomy could reduce intraoperative peritoneal related symptoms.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute appendicitis is among the most common causes of lower abdominal pain leading patients to attend the emergency department and the most common diagnosis made in young patients admitted to the hospital with an acute abdomen .

In intracavitary abdominal surgery (e.g. Appendectomy),general anesthesia is conventionally chosen as it provides a higher safety profile with respect to the risk of aspiration, abdominal discomfort, and better exposure secondary to muscle relaxation however, at present it is considered safe to do spinal anesthesia in various abdominal procedures, even where significant muscle relaxation is required in certain complex cases such as peritonitis many patients with complicated conditions were operated under spinal anesthesia, which did not significantly interfere with surgical technique or exposure. Additional advantages of spinal anesthesia include faster recovery, better oral tolerance, and shorter hospital stay compared to general anesthesia.

The Covid-19 pandemic currently affects almost every aspect of healthcare. The risk to the operating room team from the contaminated aerosols produced by intubation and positive pressure ventilation may be reduced by performing suitable open operations with neuraxial anaesthesia instead of General anesthesia .

Neuroaxial anesthesia is commonly preferred for surgeries of lower abdomen, perineal and lower limb. It is easy to administer and very economical but needs skills. Intrathecal local anesthetics are limited by short duration of action and needs early use of rescue analgesia postoperatively. Adjuvants are added to improve quality and duration, provide better postoperative analgesia and patient comfort.

A common problem during abdominal surgeries under spinal anesthesia is peritoneal related symptoms as visceral pain, nausea, vomiting, vagal symptoms like bradycardia and hypotension.

Many adjuvants like fentanyl, morphine, ketamine, neostigmine, and clonidine are being used to prolong the analgesic effects of local anaesthetic for many years. These drugs including opioids are usually results in several side effects include itching, decrease respiratory rate, difficulty in urination, postoperative gastrointestinal disturbance which can be overcome by preferring them as adjuvant with other analgesics.

Intraoperative peritoneal related symptoms as visceral pain, nausea, vomiting, vagal symptoms like bradycardia and hypotension are a common problem and there are some intrathecal adjuvants can solve these symptoms.

Fentanyl is µ receptor agonist 80 times more potent than morphine as an analgesic added to spinal 0.5% heavy bupivacaine improves quality of spinal analgesia, reduces visceral and somatic pain. However, their addition may have side effects like pruritus, respiratory depression, urinary retention, postoperative nausea and vomiting which limits their use.

Dexmedetomidine is highly selective α2-agonist, S-enantiomer of veterinary sedative medetomidine. Food and Drug Administration has approved its use for short-term ICU sedation, it is reported to provide sedation that parallels natural sleep, anxiolysis, analgesia, sympatholytic, and anaesthetic-sparing effect with minimal respiratory depression. α2- agonists produce clinical effects.

It was reported in a previous study that intraoperative dexmedetomidine can reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)in patients undergoing thoracic surgery and a dose-response relationship between intraoperative dexmedetomidine and PONV was Observed; and the optimal dose range for antiemetic effects of PONV is 50-100 μg. Previous small Some meta-analyses demonstrated that intraoperative dexmedetomidine significantly lowered post-operative pain scores and opioid consumption, which could lead to a reduced opioid-related adverse events, including PONV.

Dexmedetomidine prevents and reduces peritoneal related symptoms Intraoperative, and it can significantly lower the demand for opioids and inhalation anesthesia during and after operation, which could help to reduce opioid-related adverse events, including PONV.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

148

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Ahmed M Hagag, MSc
  • Phone Number: 01141097536

Study Locations

      • Aswan, Egypt, 81528
        • Recruiting
        • Aswan University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Ahmed M Hagag, MSc
          • Phone Number: 01141097536
        • Contact:
          • Ayman M Eldemrdash, MD
        • Contact:
          • Ahmed A Mahmoud, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ASA physical status class I and II.
  2. Age between 18 - 60 years of either sex.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. ASA grade III and IV.
  2. Infection at the site of injection.
  3. Coagulopathy or anticoagulation.
  4. Congenital anomalies of lower spine.
  5. Active disease of CNS.
  6. History of allergy to local anesthetics or the adjuvants.
  7. Complicated appendicitis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group D (N.74)
5µg Dexmedetomidine {precedexTM 200U/2ml Hospira, Inc,lake forest,iL,USA} (5 µg added by taking 50 µg in a insulin syringe) + 4ml 0.5% heavy bupivacaine HCl.
Compare between the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants on decreasing the intraoperative peritoneal symptoms such as abdominal discomfort or visceral pain, nausea and vomiting, vagal symptoms like bradycardia and hypotension during appendectomy.
Active Comparator: Group F (N.74) -
25 µg Fentanyl {fentanyl Hameln 50 u/ml Gmbh-germany} + 4ml 0.5% heavy bupivacaine HCl.
Compare between the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants on decreasing the intraoperative peritoneal symptoms such as abdominal discomfort or visceral pain, nausea and vomiting, vagal symptoms like bradycardia and hypotension during appendectomy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intraoperative peritoneal symptoms during appendectomy.
Time Frame: Intraoperative period in minutes
Compare between the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants on decreasing the intraoperative peritoneal symptoms such as abdominal discomfort or visceral pain, nausea and vomiting, vagal symptoms like bradycardia and hypotension during appendectomy.
Intraoperative period in minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of motor block with Modified Bromage scale
Time Frame: 1,6,12,18 and 24 hours

Assessment of motor block with Modified Bromage scale;

Bromage Scale:

  1. Bromage 0 - patient can move the hip, knee, and ankle.
  2. Bromage 1 - patient is unable to move the hip but can move the knee and ankle.
  3. Bromage 2 - patient is unable to move the hip and knee but able to move the ankle.

    • Onset of Bromage 3 (min), Regression to bromage 0 (min).

Bromage Scale:

  1. Bromage 0 - patient can move the hip, knee, and ankle.
  2. Bromage 1 - patient is unable to move the hip but can move the knee and ankle.
  3. Bromage 2 - patient is unable to move the hip and knee but able to move the ankle.
1,6,12,18 and 24 hours
Degree of post-operative analgesia
Time Frame: 1,6,12,18 and 24 hours
VI. The postoperative pain score will be assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS; scored from 0-10, where 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain imaginable) during the recovery room(T0) and at 1,6,12,18 and 24 hours (T1, T6, T12,T18 and T24) in the postoperative period
1,6,12,18 and 24 hours
Assessment of sensory block by using pin prick method
Time Frame: Time in minutes
Assessment of sensory block by using pin prick method; Time from injection to T10(min) and Time from injection to highest Sensory cephalad spread, Resolution to T10 (min)
Time in minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ayman M Eldemrdash, MD, Aswan University
  • Principal Investigator: Ahmed A Mahmoud, MD, Aswan University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 25, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dexmedetomidine

Clinical Trials on Dexmedetomidine Injection [Precedex]

Subscribe