Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Aphasia After Stroke (TRANSLATE)

Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Language Recovery After Stroke: a Pilot Study

Aphasia is an acquired language disorder. Stroke is the most common cause of aphasia, which affects 30% of stroke survivors. Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) can help people with aphasia but it may not be provided at the required intensity. Access to therapy is often limited after the first few months following stroke. People with aphasia can improve with therapy many years after stroke but these benefits have not been found to translate to day to day conversation.

Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) is a non-invasive technique which involves stimulating a branch of the vagus nerve through the skin of the ear, using a small earpiece. This technique is safe and has been approved for use in headache. There is promising evidence that tVNS can improve motor rehabilitation in chronic stroke. This technique may be helpful in aiding language recovery in individuals with chronic aphasia.

The current pilot study will primarily assess the feasibility, safety and tolerability of self-directed tVNS paired with computer-based SLT, in individuals with chronic stroke-related aphasia. Secondly, the study aims to explore the effect of the intervention on word-finding ability and to explore potential mechanisms of action. Participants will be randomly allocated to an active or sham tVNS group. Participants will be asked to use the stimulation device at home for 6 weeks, whilst completing computer-based SLT. To date, there are no published studies exploring the use of tVNS in aphasia. An indication of study feasibility may support the development of a larger RCT to explore treatment efficacy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aphasia is an acquired communication disorder, characterised by difficulties with the production and/or understanding of language. Stroke is the most common cause of aphasia which affects approximately 30% of stroke survivors. Many individuals are left with chronic deficits. Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) is the gold-standard treatment for aphasia but access to therapy is limited beyond the first few months of recovery. Individuals with chronic aphasia (>6 months) can benefit from SLT input. Computer-based SLT can lead to improvements in word-finding for people with aphasia, many years after stroke (Palmer et al., 2019). Improvements have not been found to translate to day-to-day conversation.

Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) paired with upper limb rehabilitation has proved beneficial in chronic stroke. Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) is a non-invasive technique which involves stimulating a branch of the vagus nerve through the skin of the ear, using a small earpiece. This technique is safe and has been approved for use in headache. The use of tVNS in chronic stroke is currently being explored, with promising findings when paired with upper limb rehabilitation exercises. To date, there are no published studies exploring the use of tVNS in chronic aphasia. Pairing tVNS with an SLT intervention may have the potential to promote language recovery in chronic stroke. An indication of study feasibility may support the development of a larger RCT to explore treatment efficacy.

This is a single centre, single blind, pilot randomised controlled trial. The primary aim is to explore the safety, tolerability and feasibility of self-directed computer-based SLT combined with tVNS, in individuals with chronic-stroke related aphasia. Secondary aims include exploring any indication of effect of the intervention on word-finding ability (trained words, generalisability to untrained words and conversation). Additionally, the study aims to explore potential mechanisms of action.

Participants will be asked to use the stimulation device alongside computer-based SLT, at home for 6 weeks. SLT training will include naming pictures of 30 personally relevant words, selected by the participant prior to the commencement of the intervention and uploaded onto the software. The SLT software (Step by Step) uses a self-guided errorless learning approach and will be completed on an ipad. The researcher will check-in with the participant each week to monitor any concerns, side effects and monitor engagement with the programme.

Potential participants will be recruited from Sheffield, using the NHS PHIND database. Accessible study invitations will be sent to potential participants. The Consent Support Tool will be used to ascertain the most appropriate way to provide study information. All participants will have capacity to consent to the study. Participants will be randomly allocated (SealedEnvelope Ltd) to an active or sham tVNS group, stratified according to language score. Participants will be blinded to group allocation.

The tVNS device will be applied to the ear (tragus or earlobe), depending on group allocation. The tVNS device (Nurosym/ Parasym II) is a UKCE marked device, indicated for off-label use in the current study. tVNS use is safe however it has been associated with mild and transitory side effects such as pain or irritation at the stimulation site, headache and nasopharyngitis (Redgrave et al 2018). Stimulation parameters are in line with previous studies:

  • Pulse Width: 250µs
  • Frequency: 25Hz
  • Intensity: individual tolerability (below pain threshold)
  • Duration: 45 minutes daily for 6 weeks

Language assessments will be taken at baseline, end of treatment (6 weeks) and at follow-up (12 weeks). To explore potential mechanisms, blood samples, heart rate variability (HRV) and pupillometry measures will be taken at baseline and end of treatment. The Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS; LUMO, Gowerlabs) will be used on a subset of participants to explore cortical activation in the frontal lobes in response to tVNS at baseline and end of treatment (6 weeks). Outcome measures will be undertaken by a trained member of the research team.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Sheffield, United Kingdom, S10 2JF
        • Recruiting
        • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Miss Samantha Dorney

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Supratentorial stroke at least 6 months prior to recruitment
  • Aphasia (with word finding difficulties)
  • Ability to engage in the programme (support can be provided for cognitive or receptive difficulties)
  • Sufficient vision to engage in the computer-based SLT programme

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Implanted devices (e.g. pacemaker) or implanted stimulation devices
  • Currently receiving a programme of Speech and Language Therapy (SLT)
  • Damage to the vagus nerve
  • Symptomatic bradycardia/ 2nd or 3rd heart block
  • Pregnancy
  • Unable to speak English
  • Severe deafness (despite using hear aids)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation
The intervention will take place for up to 45 minutes per day, 5 days per week for 6 weeks. The stimulation device will be worn whilst completing computer-based Speech and Language Therapy.
Computer-based Speech and Language Therapy will be completed whilst wearing the stimulation device in all groups. The Step by Step programme uses an errorless learning approach to practice naming. All participants will practice a set of 30 meaningful words during the intervention. Participants will complete the SLT programme at home on an ipad, whilst using the stimulation device.

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation using the Nurosym (Parasym Ltd) device.

Stimulation parameters:

Pulse width: 250µs; Frequency: 25Hz; Intensity: Below pain threshold.

The active stimulation will be delivered to the left ear. Participants will complete the intervention at home once they have received sufficient training on how to use the stimulation device.

Sham Comparator: Sham Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation
The sham intervention will take place for up to 45 minutes per day, 5 days per week for 6 weeks. The device will be in 'sham' mode. The stimulation device will be worn whilst completing computer-based Speech and Language Therapy.
Computer-based Speech and Language Therapy will be completed whilst wearing the stimulation device in all groups. The Step by Step programme uses an errorless learning approach to practice naming. All participants will practice a set of 30 meaningful words during the intervention. Participants will complete the SLT programme at home on an ipad, whilst using the stimulation device.
Stimulation will be delivered at the same parameters however, sham stimulation will be delivered to the left ear. This sham method has been used as a sham in other studies as it is not thought to activate the vagus nerve.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety: The number of adverse events reported that are associated with tVNS
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The safety of using tVNS in the aphasia population will be measured through the recording of adverse events. The number of Serious Adverse Events (SAE's) and Unexpected Adverse Events (UAE's) during the intervention will be reported.
6 weeks
Tolerability: The number and intensity of symptoms reported
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The reporting of symptoms associated with tVNS will be recorded and the severity of each symptom on a 1-5 scale (1= mild; 5 = severe).
6 weeks
Percentage of participants completing the study intervention and outcome measures
Time Frame: 24 months
>80% of recruited participants completing the intervention and primary outcome measures at 6 weeks
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Picture Naming (personally relevant)
Time Frame: Week 0; Week 6; Week 12
The number of pictures that are accurately named at each time point, out of a maximum of 30. Pictures will be personally relevant and selected by the participant prior to the start of the intervention. These pictures will be trained during the computer-based SLT intervention. Naming will be assessed at baseline, end of treatment (6 weeks) and at follow-up (12 weeks) using the same picture set.
Week 0; Week 6; Week 12
The Comprehensive Aphasia Test (CAT): Naming Objects
Time Frame: Week 0; Week 6; Week 12
The number of pictures that are accurately named at each time point, out of a maximum of 48. A standardized set of 24 pictures will be used from The Comprehensive Aphasia Test (CAT) Naming Objects subtest. This will assess the ability to name untrained words. This task will be completed at baseline, end of treatment (6 weeks) and at follow-up (12 weeks).
Week 0; Week 6; Week 12
Conversation: The number of trained words used in conversation
Time Frame: Week 0; Week 6; Week 12
A 10 minute scripted conversation will be conducted for each participant, surrounding topics of personal relevance, to prompt the use of trained words in a conversational context. The number of times a word is used will be recorded
Week 0; Week 6; Week 12
Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) (ng/ml)
Time Frame: Week 0; Week 6
Blood samples will be taken at baseline and end of treatment (6 weeks) to measure BDNF levels in serum
Week 0; Week 6
Inflammatory markers (pg/ml)
Time Frame: Week 0; Week 6
Blood samples will be taken at baseline and end of treatment (6 weeks) to measure inflammatory markers: IL-1B, IL-6, IL-10 and TNFa (pg/ml).
Week 0; Week 6
Heart Rate Variability (HRV)
Time Frame: Week 0; Week 6
Heart rate variability will be measured in 5 minute phases before, during and following electrical stimulation. The Standard deviation of the RR intervals (SDNN) will be recorded (ms).
Week 0; Week 6
Pupillary Reactivity
Time Frame: Week 0; Week 6
Pupillary response to light stimulus. Maximum and minimum diameters (mm)
Week 0; Week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dr Ali Ali, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Study Director: Prof. Arshad Majid, University of Sheffield
  • Study Director: Prof. Rebecca Palmer, University of Sheffield

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 3, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aphasia

  • Teachers College, Columbia University
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia Non Fluent | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction | Aphasia, Rehabilitation
    United States
  • University of South Carolina
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Completed
    Stroke | Aphasia | Stroke, Ischemic | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia, Global | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Jargon | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (svPPA) | Nonfluent Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (nfvPPA) | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia... and other conditions
    United States
  • University of California, Berkeley
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and... and other collaborators
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Non-fluent | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia Following Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Primary Progressive Aphasia(PPA) | Logopenic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Progressive Aphasia in Alzheimer's Disease
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and...
    Active, not recruiting
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Enrolling by invitation
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia
    Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.; Universitat Pompeu Fabra
    Completed
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Wernicke | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Nonfluent
    Spain
  • Flint Rehabilitation Devices, LLC
    University of Texas
    Completed
    Broca Aphasia
    United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Recruiting
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Apraxia of Speech | PPA | Non-fluent Aphasia | Primary Progressive Non-fluent Aphasia
    United States

Clinical Trials on Computer Based Speech and Language Therapy (Step by Step)

Subscribe