Comparison of Skeletal Effects of Herbst and Invisalign MA in Growing Patients With KLass II Malocclusion

May 7, 2024 updated by: Paul-Henry Casselman, Université Libre de Bruxelles

Comparison of Skeletal Effects of Herbst and Invisalign MA in Growing Patients With KLass Malocclusion

This study aims to determine and compare the precise skeletal dental and soft tissue effect of Mandibular advancement aligners and Herbst Appliance.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Precise description of study methodology.

For each group, a sample of +- 15 patients with class 2 malocclusion aged between 9 and 15 years will be collected for this prospective study who presented for an initial orthodontic consultation between October 2022 and july 20262 at ULB's Erasme Hospital. Each patient will be treated with Invisalign MA or the Herbst appliance by residents of the orthodontic program directed by P. Maria Orellana

Inclusion criteria included a Class II skeletal malocclusion with an ANB greater than 4°; (In the case of a Class 2 Division 2 malocclusion, the retroclined upper incisors will be proclined to obtain an overjet allowing mandibular advancement. If the patient has a transverse deficit, palatal expansion will be performed before treatment with aligners and during treatment in herbst cases.) Class II molar and canine relationship and CVM2/CVM3 cervical vertebral maturation.

Informed consent forms in the patient's native language will be submitted before the start of each treatment.

Only a profile cephalometry will be taken in the patients considered for this study at the time of the initial consultation.

This will avoid unnecessary radiographic exposure, and a panoramic view of each patient will be extracted from a CBCT using the FDA-approved BlueskyBio program.

Aligners or Herbst appliance for orthodontic treatment will be fabricated on the basis of a 3D optical scan (Itero), after which patients will begin treatment.

Levelling of the Spee curve, derotation of (pre)molars and palatal incisors in the case of class 2 division 2 malocclusion will be carried out before the mandibular advancement stage if necessary in the Aligner group.

A full-face ultra-low dose CBCT scan will be performed on all included subjects before the mandibular advancement stage according to a strict protocol by a certified physician. Active mandibular advancement will be continued till a KLass I molar relationship is obtained and will be followed by 2 months without mandibular advancement to allow the mandibular condyles to take a central position in the condylar fossae. After this 2-month period, a second CBCT scan will be performed (T2), with a minimal time interval of one year between the two CBCT scans, using the same protocol.

CBCTs will be acquired using a Promax Mid 90 Kv with settings of 90 kV and 8.9 mAS, and tube current modulation will be used to enable patient-specific dose reduction.

After the second CBCT, orthodontic treatment will be continued until completion, and retention and regular post-treatment follow-up will be scheduled for each patient.

The superposition of CBCT (T1) and (T2) images on the anterior cranial base will be used to determine exact mandibular lengthening, condylar displacement, mandibular rotation and chin displacement using the following methodology described and developed by Hugo. De Clerck in 2009.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Anderlecht, Belgium, 1070
      • Brussels, Belgium, 1070
        • Recruiting
        • Université Libre de Bruxelles
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Phone Number: +32472424640

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • ANB greater than 4°.
  • Angle Class II molar and canine relationship
  • cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) CVM2/CVM3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • CVM> 4
  • periodontal disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Invisalign MA- group (mandibular advancement)
Patients treated by MA aligner system of invisalign
orthodontic treatment where a retrognathic mandibula is put into an anterior position to stimulate mandibular growth. This will happen by either the MA-invisalign system or the herbst appliance
Active Comparator: Herbst group
Patient treated with the herbst appliance
orthodontic treatment where a retrognathic mandibula is put into an anterior position to stimulate mandibular growth. This will happen by either the MA-invisalign system or the herbst appliance

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mandibular lenghtening
Time Frame: Difference between T1/T2. T1: Before Mandibular advancement phase, T2: Minimum 1 year after T1 and 2 months without mandibular advancement.
Difference between T1/T2. T1: Before Mandibular advancement phase, T2: Minimum 1 year after T1 and 2 months without mandibular advancement.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 14, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 10, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 10, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SRB2023175

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mandibular Growth Stimulation

Clinical Trials on Stimulation of mandibular growth.

Subscribe