- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06418217
Exercise and Patient Education for Patients With Lateral Hip Pain
3 Months Semi-supervised Exercise Intervention for Patients With Hip Abductor Tendon Pathology (HATP): A Prospective Clinical Cohort Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study protocol describes an interventional pragmatic prospective single-group cohort study, where the primary endpoint is change in hip pain measured with the revised HAGOS pain subscale following a 12 week intervention. Throughout the 12 weeks, eight physiotherapist-led exercise sessions will take place at Horsens Regional Hospital (HRH). Further, at the sessions at HRH patient education will be performed by the supervising physiotherapist. The first supervised sessions will be performed in continuation of the baseline assessment. The patients will be instructed to do the exercises daily at home in the time period between the physiotherapist-led sessions.
The primary aim is to investigate changes in patient-reported hip pain based on the subscale "pain" from the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) from baseline to 12 week follow-up.
It is hypothesized that the revised HAGOS pain score will improve from baseline to 12 week follow-up.
Secondarily explorative subgroup analyses regarding whether patients with different MRI findings, pain profiles, age, sex and body mass index (BMI) respond differently to the intervention, will be performed.
All outcomes conducted will be published. That is, patient-reported outcomes, muscle strength, functional capacity and adherence to the exercise protocol.
A full study protocol will be published and made available.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jeppe Lange, MD, PhD
- Email: jepplang@rm.dk
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Mathias Høgsholt, PT,PhD.-st.
- Phone Number: +45 24205299
- Email: mathhg@rm.dk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Horsens, Denmark, 8700
- Recruiting
- Horsens Regional Hospital
-
Contact:
- Mathias Høgsholt, PT,PhD.-st.
- Phone Number: +45 24205299
- Email: mathhg@rm.dk
-
Contact:
- Jeppe Lange, MD,PhD.
- Email: jepplang@rm.dk
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-75 years
- MRI verified HATP
- Lateral hip pain duration > 6 months
- Ability to read and understand Danish.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Corticosteroid injection in the affected hip joint within the last six weeks prior to the intervention
- Previous bone-related surgery to the affected hip,
- Signs of bilateral HATP
- X-ray verified hip osteoarthritis
- Pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Physiotherapist-led exercise
Physiotherapy-led exercise of patients with lateral hip pain
|
Patients will undergo a 12-week physiotherapist-led exercise program consisting of 8 supervised sessions and home-based training in between. Patients will keep training diaries, where each session is tracked in regards of completed repetitions and pain before and after the sessions. Each session will consist of four exercises. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in patient-reported pain measured with the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) (continuous data)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
The subscale "pain" on HAGOS measures the patients perception of hip and/or groin pain.
It consist of ten items.
A score from 0 to 100 is calculated, where a higher score is indicating lower pain.
|
From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in patient-reported symptoms measured with the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) (continuous data)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
The subscale "symptoms" on HAGOS measures the patients perception of hip and/or groin pain.
It consist of seven items.
A score from 0 to 100 is calculated, where a higher score is indicating lower symptoms.
|
From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
|
Changes in patient-reported physical function in daily living (ADL) measured with the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) (continuous data)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
The subscale "ADL" on HAGOS measures the patients perception of hip and/or groin pain.
It consist of five items.
A score from 0 to 100 is calculated, where a higher score is indicating higher function.
|
From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
|
Changes in patient-reported physical function in sport and recreational activities (sport/recreation) measured with the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) (continuous data)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
The subscale "sport/recreation" on HAGOS measures the patients perception of hip and/or groin pain.
It consist of eight items.
A score from 0 to 100 is calculated, where a higher score is indicating higher function.
|
From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
|
Changes in patient-reported participation in physical activities (PA) measured with the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) (continuous data)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
The subscale "PA" on HAGOS measures the patients perception of hip and/or groin pain.
It consist of two items.
A score from 0 to 100 is calculated, where a higher score is indicating higher ability to participate in physical activity.
|
From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
|
Changes in patient-reported quality of life (QOL) measured with the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) (continuous data)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
The subscale "QOL" on HAGOS measures the patients perception of hip and/or groin pain.
It consist of five items.
A score from 0 to 100 is calculated, where a higher score is indicating higher quality of life.
|
From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
|
Changes in the patient-reported outcome measure Oxford Hip Score (continuous data)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
Oxford Hip Score (OHS), which consists of 12items.
OHS is developed and validated for patients undergoing total hip replacements to access pain and function.
It is a composite score ranging from 0 (worst) to 48 (best).
|
From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
|
Changes in the patient-reported outcome measure EQ-5D-5L (continuous data)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
European Questionnaire-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS) consists of five items and a visual analogue score (VAS), a vertical line on which the patients score their perception of their overall health from 0 to 100 (worst to best)
|
From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
|
Global Rating of Change (GRoC)
Time Frame: The outcome is conducted at 6-week and 3-months follow-up.
|
GRoC consists of a 11-point scale, where the patient rates the perceived overall change of the hip condition from "very much better" to "very much worse" .
Responses on GRoC will be considered successful if patients scored "moderately better" to "very much better".
Global improvement will be measured as the percentage of successful reports.
|
The outcome is conducted at 6-week and 3-months follow-up.
|
|
Lateral hip pain on a numerical pain rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
Participants rate their pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable).
Participants will rate their average pain for the past 7 days during rest, at the beginning of activity, during activity, 2 hours after activity and the worst lateral hip pain.
|
From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
|
Changes in the patient-reported outcome measure The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Gluteal Questionnaire (VISA-G) (continuous data)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Gluteal Questionnaire (VISA-G) is validated for patients with gluteal tendinopathy and measures the severity of disability related to the condition.
VISA-G consist of eight items and appraise the pain in relation to gluteal tendinopathy by a score from 0-100, where a higher score will indicate lower pain and less disability.
|
From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
|
Changes of maximal isometric hip abduction muscle strength (continuous data)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
Maximal isometric hip abduction strength test measures the maximal voluntary isometric contraction in supine position.
The strength will be measured using a fixed dynamometer.
Strength will be conducted in Newton, but will be normalised according to the lever arm and body weight, and will be reported as Nm/kg bodyweight.
|
From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
|
Changes of maximal isometric hip adduction muscle strength (continuous data)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
Maximal isometric hip adduction strength test measures the maximal voluntary isometric contraction in supine position.
The strength will be measured using a fixed dynamometer.
Strength will be conducted in Newton, but will be normalised according to the lever arm and body weight, and will be reported as Nm/kg bodyweight.
|
From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
|
Changes of maximal isometric hip flexion muscle strength (continuous data)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
Maximal isometric hip flexion strength test measures the maximal voluntary isometric contraction in sitting position.
The strength will be measured using a fixed dynamometer.
Strength will be conducted in Newton, but will be normalised according to the lever arm and body weight, and will be reported as Nm/kg bodyweight.
|
From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
|
Changes of maximal isometric hip extension muscle strength (continuous data)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
Maximal isometric hip extension strength test measures the maximal voluntary isometric contraction in prone position.
The strength will be measured using a fixed dynamometer.
Strength will be conducted in Newton, but will be normalised according to the lever arm and body weight, and will be reported as Nm/kg bodyweight.
|
From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
|
Changes of the number of repetitions of a 30 second sit to stand test (continuous data)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
Number of repetitions (sits to stand) performed during 30 seconds on a chair with a seat height of 45 cm.
|
From baseline to 3 months follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 6-week follow-up.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Adherence to the exercise program.
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months follow-up.
|
The adherence will be calculated as the proportion of completed exercise sessions in relation to the planned exercise sessions.
A high adherence will be defined as completion of 75% or more of the planned exercises sessions (both supervised and home-based), medium adherence with completion of 50-74%, and low adherence with completion of less than 50%.
|
From baseline to 3 months follow-up.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Kristian Thorborg, PhD, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre
- Principal Investigator: Mathias Høgsholt, PT, PhD.st., Horsens Regional Hospital; Aarhus University
- Study Director: Jeppe Lange, MD, PhD, Horsens Regional Hospital; Aarhus University
- Study Chair: Signe Kierkegaard-Brøchner, PhD, Regionshospitalet Horsens
- Study Chair: Marie Bagger Bohn, MD, PhD, Regionshospitalet Horsens
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1-16-02-180-24
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
What data will be shared: All quantitative individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification, and according to current Danish Data Protection Regulation and GDPR.
With whom will data be shared: Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.
For what types of analyses: To achieve aims in the approved proposal. The abovementioned is based on Data Sharing Statements for Clinical Trial: A Requirement of the ICMJE located at: https://www.icmje.org/news-and-editorials/data_sharing_june_2017.pdf
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome
-
Brixton Biosciences, Inc.MCRANot yet recruitingGreater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome | Lateral Hip Pain | Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome of Both Lower Limbs
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalRecruitingGreater Trochanteric Pain SyndromeTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Foundation IRCCS San Matteo HospitalActive, not recruitingGreater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome of Both Lower LimbsItaly
-
Ankara Etlik City HospitalCompletedGluteal Tendinopathy | Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome | Deep Gluteal SyndromeTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of AlcalaNot yet recruitingGreater Trocantheric Pain Syndrome
-
Gazi UniversityCompletedGluteal Tendinitis | Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome of Both Lower LimbsTurkey
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteNot yet recruitingLow Back Pain | Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome
-
C.R.Darnall Army Medical CenterUnknownGreater Trochanteric Pain SyndromeUnited States
-
Aalborg UniversityRecruitingGreater Trochanteric Pain SyndromeDenmark
-
Guna S.p.aCompletedGreater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome | Pertrochanteric Fracture | Gluteal Tendinitis | GTPS - Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome | Tendon Disorder | Gluteal MusclesItaly
Clinical Trials on Exercise and Patient Education
-
Oslo University HospitalUnknownHip OsteoarthritisNorway
-
Ullevaal University HospitalUnknownExercise Therapy and Patient Education for Individuals With Hip Osteoarthritis. Long-term Follow-up.Hip OsteoarthritisNorway
-
Ullevaal University HospitalNorwegian Foundation for Health and RehabilitationCompletedHip OsteoarthritisNorway
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedPulmonary Arterial HypertensionPakistan
-
Hasan Kalyoncu UniversityCompletedHeadache | Temporomandibular DisordersTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Bayero University Kano, NigeriaCompleted
-
Karadeniz Technical UniversityCompletedTemporomandibular Joint Disc DisplacementTurkey
-
Bayero University Kano, NigeriaCompletedNonspecific Chronic Low Back PainNigeria
-
Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal. Escola Superior...Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental; Universidade de Lisboa - Faculdade Letras; Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal E.P.E... and other collaboratorsUnknown