Telerehabilitation After Coronavirus

February 17, 2021 updated by: KTO Karatay University

Telerehabilitation After Covid-19: Effectiveness of Respiratory and Aerobic Training

The aim of the study is to investigate the effects of telerehabilitation program on COVID-19 symptoms, quality of life, level of depression, perception of dyspnea, sleep, fatigue, kinesiophobia and patient satisfaction in individuals diagnosed with COVID-19.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Because of the risk of infection, telerehabilitation applications are recommended for patients with COVID-19. There are no studies in the literature evaluating the effectiveness of telerehabilitation program after COVID-19. In particular, the importance of the first eight weeks after the disease was emphasized.

It is thought that the telerehabilitation program will improve the functional capacities and quality of life of patients in order to adapt to the daily life after the infection more easily, to cope with the symptoms brought about by the disease more easily and to prevent the respiratory distress, intensive care stay and inactivity due to muscle weakness.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Karatay
      • Konya, Karatay, Turkey, 42030
        • KTO Karatay University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • volunteering to participate in the study
  • at least once diagnosed with COVID-19,
  • has a cognitive level that can adapt to online exercises,
  • having a physical condition suitable for exercises
  • staying in hospital due to covid-19

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refuse to participate in the study
  • having neurological, cardiac, respiratory disease that prevents exercise

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Patient Education Group
Information training about COViD-19 and its symptoms, hygiene education, family education
Patient education about covid-19 and hygiene education
EXPERIMENTAL: Aerobic Training Group
Teaching and regular follow-up of aerobic exercises shown online
Patient education about covid-19 and hygiene education
Aerobic exercises using all body muscles and that one can do on their own after being shown online
EXPERIMENTAL: Aerobic + Respiratory Training Group
Teaching and regular follow-up of aerobic and respiratory exercises shown online
Patient education about covid-19 and hygiene education
Aerobic exercises using all body muscles and that one can do on their own after being shown online
Respiratory exercises that one can do on their own after being shown online

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dyspnoea
Time Frame: baseline
It will be evaluated by the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC). It consists of 5 items between 0 and 4. The increase in the score indicates the severity of dyspnea.
baseline
Anxiety and Depression
Time Frame: baseline
It will be evaluated by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The questionnaire comprises seven questions for anxiety and seven questions for depression, and takes 2-5min to complete. Although the anxiety and depression questions are interspersed within the questionnaire, it is vital that these are scored separately. Cut-off scores are available for quantification, for example a score of 8 or more for anxiety. The increase in the score indicates the severity of anxiety and depression.
baseline
Sleep Quality
Time Frame: baseline
It will be evaluated by pittsburgh sleep quality index
baseline
Health Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: baseline
It will be evaluated by SF-36
baseline
Dyspnoea
Time Frame: 6 weeks later
It will be evaluated by the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC). It will be evaluated by the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC). It consists of 5 items between 0 and 4. The increase in the score indicates the severity of dyspnea.
6 weeks later
Anxiety and Depression
Time Frame: 6 weeks later
It will be evaluated by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The questionnaire comprises seven questions for anxiety and seven questions for depression, and takes 2-5min to complete. Although the anxiety and depression questions are interspersed within the questionnaire, it is vital that these are scored separately. Cut-off scores are available for quantification, for example a score of 8 or more for anxiety. The increase in the score indicates the severity of anxiety and depression.
6 weeks later
Sleep Quality
Time Frame: 6 weeks later
It will be evaluated by pittsburgh sleep quality index
6 weeks later
Health Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: 6 weeks later
It will be evaluated by SF-36
6 weeks later

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: baseline
It will be evaluated by Kinesiophobia Causes Scale. The questionnaire consist of 20 closed questions, assessed in a range from 0 to 100 - a higher score indicating a higher fear of movement
baseline
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 weeks later
It will be evaluated by patient satisfaction scale. Likert scale questionnaire proposed seven dimensions of patient satisfaction directed toward their doctors. These are general satisfaction, technical quality, interpersonal manner, communication, financial aspects, time spent with doctor, and accessibility and convenience. Increased score indicates decreased satisfaction. The minimum score is 18, the maximum score is 90.
6 weeks later
Fatigue
Time Frame: baseline
It will be evaluated by Fatigue Severity Scale. A self-report scale of nine items about fatigue, its severity and how it affects certain activities. Answers are scored on a seven point scale where 1 = strongly disagree and 7 = strongly agree. This means the minimum score possible is nine and the highest is 63.
baseline
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: 6 weeks later
It will be evaluated by Kinesiophobia Causes Scale. The questionnaire consist of 20 closed questions, assessed in a range from 0 to 100 - a higher score indicating a higher fear of movement
6 weeks later
Fatigue
Time Frame: 6 weeks later
It will be evaluated by Fatigue Severity Scale. A self-report scale of nine items about fatigue, its severity and how it affects certain activities. Answers are scored on a seven point scale where 1 = strongly disagree and 7 = strongly agree. This means the minimum score possible is nine and the highest is 63.
6 weeks later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Özlem Akkoyun Sert, Phd, PT, KTO Karatay University
  • Study Chair: Kamil Yılmaz, Phd, PT, KTO Karatay University
  • Study Chair: Osman Karaca, MsC,PT, KTO Karatay University
  • Study Chair: Hasan Gerçek, PT, KTO Karatay University
  • Study Chair: Bayram Sönmez Ünüvar, MsC, PT, KTO Karatay University
  • Study Chair: Sinan Bağçacı, Dr, KTO Karatay University
  • Study Chair: Büşra Alkan, MsC, PT, RA, KTO Karatay University
  • Study Chair: Melike Akdam, PT, RA, KTO Karatay University
  • Study Chair: Buse Kılınç, PT, KTO Karatay University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 19, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 19, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 17, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KaratayU2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID

Clinical Trials on Patient Education

3
Subscribe