RCT: the Effectiveness of LifeHack in Improving Mental Wellbeing in University Students.

May 15, 2024 updated by: Sanne van Luenen, Universiteit Leiden

LifeHack: RCT Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Guided E-health Programme in Improving Mental Wellbeing in University Students.

Psychological issues are common among university students and affect mental wellbeing. The Caring Universities (CU) project, involving nine Dutch universities, aims to enhance students' mental health through an annual online questionnaire and a platform offering guided eHealth interventions. One intervention, LifeHack, utilizes cognitive behavioral therapy-based modules to improve mental wellbeing by enhancing resilience and life skills. The effects of LifeHack with pre-post measurements (total n = 216 at post-test) found found that LifeHack led to improvements in mental wellbeing, but dropout rates were influenced by lack of motivation and module relevance. A personalized version of LifeHack is being developed to address these issues and will be evaluated in an RCT to assess its effectiveness in improving mental wellbeing and related outcomes among university students.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Psychological problems are prevalent among university students and are associated with lower mental wellbeing and resilience. Universities provide an excellent environment for students to enhance mental wellbeing, resilience, and acquire life skills.

Caring Universities (CU) is an internationally embedded consortium of nine Dutch universities aimed at improving students' mental wellbeing. The CU project consists of two components: 1) an annual online questionnaire assessing students' mental health; and 2) a platform offering free, guided eHealth interventions to enhance mental well-being.

One of the interventions on the CU platform - called LifeHack - seeks to enhance mental wellbeing by increasing resilience, teaching life skills, and strengthening mental wellbeing. LifeHack is a guided eHealth intervention based on cognitive behavioural therapy, comprising 13 modules of approximately 30 minutes each focusing on four themes (mood management, productivity, self-worth, and relationships). We investigated the effects of LifeHack with pre-post measurements (total n = 216 at post-test) and found that after following LifeHack, mental wellbeing improved with small to moderate effect sizes. Additionally, students reported satisfaction with the programme and the eCoach. However, participants indicated lack of motivation and early symptom reduction as important reasons for drop-out. Furthermore, the diverse topics covered in LifeHack may not be relevant to all students, leading to more dropouts.

Currently, there are two versions of LifeHack: one 'structured', where modules must be completed in order, and one 'free choice', where all modules are available from the start and none are mandatory. For the proposed study, the free choice version of LifeHack will be used and adapted in co-creation with students as follows: participants will be asked which topics they find most important and want to work on. Based on their answers, a personalized selection of modules will be presented, and students can choose which module to start with. Each module is standalone, allowing students to proceed to another module or stop after completing one or more. Each module has a clear structure, beginning with goal formulation and concluding with an action plan. The new adapted version of LifeHack will be personalized and tailored for each student, aiming to improve motivation and reduce dropout rates.

With the current study, we aim to examine the effectiveness of the adapted version of LifeHack in an RCT to enhance mental wellbeing in university students. Secondary objectives include investigating differences between the intervention and control groups on students' self-report questionnaire resilience scores, depression scores, anxiety scores, stress-related scores, and mental health quality of life scores (pretest vs post-test). Additional outcomes include satisfaction with the programme and the eCoach, as well as adherence to the intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

217

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • VU Amsterdam
        • Contact:
          • Sanne van Luenen
      • Leiden, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Leiden University
        • Contact:
          • Sanne van Luenen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being fluent in Dutch and/or English
  • Being enrolled as a student at one of the 9 participating universities
  • Being 16 years of age or older
  • Having access to a PC or mobile device with internet access
  • Provide informed consent before participation
  • Score of 50 or lower on the MHC-SF. This is 1 SD above the mean baseline score of participants of LifeHack. This inclusion criterion ensures no students with optimal mental wellbeing are included because they will not be able to show any change.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: LifeHack

LifeHack is a guided (weekly feedback by a coach is provided) e-heath self-help application, which is based on cognitive behavioral techniques. The goal of LifeHack is to improve mental wellbeing.

The guided internet-based self-help programme LifeHack was developed based on existing literature and adapted in collaboration with university students. The programme comprises twelve modules that are delivered via computer, laptop, tablet, or mobile phone. The modules take approximately 30 minutes on 4 themes (mood management, productivity, self-worth and relationships).

Guidance:

E-coaches will be trained clinical psychology master students. E-coaches will provide asynchronous written personalized feedback to each participant through the program platform within 48 hours (counting workdays only) after session completion. The aim of the written feedback is to increase motivation and adherence of the participants.

See arm description
No Intervention: Control group
Participants in the waiting list control condition will start with the programme 4 weeks after randomization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mental wellbeing (MHC-SF)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Mental Health Continuum-Short Form, MHC-SF (Lamers et al., 2011).
T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resilience (BRS)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Brief Resilience Scale (Smith et al., 2008).
T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Depressive symptoms (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Patient Health Questionnaire - 9, PHQ-9 (Kroenke et al., 2001).
T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Stress related symptoms (PSS-10)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Perceived Stress Scale-10, PSS-10 (Cohen, 1988).
T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Symptoms of anxiety (GAD-7)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale, GAD-7 (Spitzer et al., 2006).
T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Quality of life (MHQoL)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Mental Health Quality of Life questionnaire, MHQoL (Krugten et al., 2022).
T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Demographics
Time Frame: T0 (baseline)
E.g. gender, age, nationality
T0 (baseline)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression and anxiety (PHQ-4) after each module.
Time Frame: After each module (approximately once per week)
Patient Health Questionnaire - 4 (Kroenke et al., 2009). After each module, the PHQ-4 will be assessed in both groups.
After each module (approximately once per week)
Client satisfaction (CSQ-8)
Time Frame: 4 weeks post-baseline active group and 4 weeks post-T2 wait list group.
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, CSQ-8 (Larsen et al., 1979)
4 weeks post-baseline active group and 4 weeks post-T2 wait list group.
E-coach evaluation (WAI-I)
Time Frame: 4 weeks post-baseline active group and 4 weeks post-T2 wait list group.
We will also ask participants to evaluate the e-coach at the post-test. The questions about e-coach evaluation will be based on the Working Alliance Inventory for Guided Internet Interventions (WAI-I) (Gómez Penedo et al., 2020)
4 weeks post-baseline active group and 4 weeks post-T2 wait list group.
Adherence (Log info)
Time Frame: T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Adherence will be measured by the total number of completed sessions, time spent on the platform, and the number of logins.
T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-10-30-S.vanLuenen-V1-506

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on LifeHack

  • VU University of Amsterdam
    Leiden University; University of Amsterdam; Maastricht University; Utrecht University and other collaborators
    Recruiting
3
Subscribe