Efficacy of Targeted Medical Therapy in Angina and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (MVP-ANOCA)

November 26, 2024 updated by: Christopher Chi-Yuen Wong, Stanford University

A Randomized Controlled Study of Targeted Medical Therapy Versus Placebo for Angina and Non- Obstructive Coronary Arteries: The MVP-ANOCA Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if targeted medical therapy will improve symptoms and quality of life in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries compared to placebo, after the underlying cause of the chest pain has been ascertained by coronary function testing.

Participants will be treated with either medications that target the underlying cause of their chest pain or placebo for 4 weeks after a drug titration phase of 1-3 weeks. They will be asked to complete a series of questionnaires to evaluate their quality of life at the beginning and end of the study.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Recruiting
        • Stanford Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jennifer Tremmel, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients with stable angina referred to the Stanford University Hospital cardiac catheterization laboratory for clinically indicated coronary function testing are eligible for inclusion into the study.

Specific inclusion criteria for randomization:

  • Absence of significant epicardial coronary artery disease on angiography
  • Fractional flow reserve > 0.80

And ≥ 1 of the following:

  • Epicardial coronary spasm on acetylcholine testing
  • Microvascular spasm on acetylcholine testing
  • Coronary flow reserve < 2.5
  • Index of microcirculatory resistance ≥ 25
  • Myocardial bridge on intravascular ultrasound with dobutamine resting full-cycle ratio ≤ 0.76

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute coronary syndrome less than one week prior to enrolment
  • Cardiomyopathy
  • Contraindications to beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers
  • Baseline systolic blood pressure < 95 mmHg
  • Baseline heart rate < 55 bpm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Targeted medical therapy
  1. Epicardial or microvascular coronary spasm: Amlodipine 2.5mg initial dose, 10mg max dose
  2. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: Nebivolol 5mg initial dose, 20mg max dose
  3. Myocardial Bridge: Nebivolol 5mg initial dose, 20mg max dose
  4. Mixed epicardial/microvascular spasm and coronary microvascular dysfunction/myocardial bridge: Amlodipine 2.5mg initial dose, 10mg max dose; PLUS Nebivolol 5mg initial dose, 20mg max dose

Participants will take their assigned therapy after randomization. Weekly person via in-person visit or telephone is performed to uptitrate therapy to the maximally tolerated dose. After 1-3 weeks, the initial drug titration phase is completed and a final dose reached. Participants are then instructed to take the maximally tolerated dose for an additional 4 weeks to the conclusion of the study.

Amlodipine taken once orally daily at a starting dose of 2.5mg, uptitrated to a maximum of 10mg if tolerated.
Other Names:
  • Norvasc
  • Katerzia
  • Norliqva
Nebivolol taken once orally daily at a starting dose of 5mg, uptitrated to a maximum of 20mg if tolerated.
Other Names:
  • Bystolic
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
  1. Epicardial or microvascular coronary spasm: Placebo
  2. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: Placebo
  3. Myocardial Bridge: Placebo
  4. Mixed epicardial/microvascular spasm and coronary microvascular dysfunction/myocardial bridge: Placebo

Participants will take their assigned therapy after randomization. Weekly person via in-person visit or telephone is performed to uptitrate therapy to the maximally tolerated dose. After 1-3 weeks, the initial drug titration phase is completed and a final dose reached. Participants are then instructed to take the maximally tolerated dose for an additional 4 weeks to the conclusion of the study.

Placebo taken once orally daily.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score
Time Frame: 5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score at follow-up compared to baseline. The score ranges from 0 - 100, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety endpoints
Time Frame: Baseline
Incidence of bleeding, coronary dissection, stroke, periprocedural myocardial infarction, non-self-limiting arrhythmias during the index coronary function testing procedure
Baseline
EuroQol 5 dimension - 5L index score
Time Frame: 5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
Change in EuroQol 5 dimension score - 5L index score at follow-up compared to baseline. The index ranges from -0.573 to 1.000, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
EuroQol 5 dimension - 5L visual analogue score
Time Frame: 5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
Change in EuroQol 5 dimension score - 5L visual analogue score at follow-up compared to baseline. The index ranges from 0 - 100, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
PHQ-4 score
Time Frame: 5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
Change in PHQ-4 at follow-up compared to baseline. The score ranges from 0 - 12, with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.
5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication score
Time Frame: 5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
Change in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication score at follow-up compared to baseline. The score ranges from 0 - 100, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score stratified by specific chest pain endotypes
Time Frame: 5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score stratified by specific chest pain endotypes at follow-up compared to baseline. The score ranges from 0 - 100, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
EuroQol 5 dimension - 5L index score stratified by specific chest pain endotypes
Time Frame: 5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
EuroQol 5 dimension - 5L index score stratified by specific chest pain endotypes at follow-up compared to baseline. The index ranges from -0.573 to 1.000, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
EuroQol 5 dimensions - 5L visual analogue score stratified by specific chest pain endotypes
Time Frame: 5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
EuroQol 5 dimensions - 5L visual analogue score stratified by specific chest pain endotypes at follow-up compared to baseline. The index ranges from 0 - 100, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
PHQ-4 scores stratified by specific chest pain endotypes
Time Frame: 5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
PHQ-4 score stratified by specific chest pain endotypes at follow-up compared to baseline. The score ranges from 0 - 12, with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.
5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication score stratified by specific chest pain endotypes
Time Frame: 5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication scores stratified by specific chest pain endotypes at follow-up compared to baseline. The score ranges from 0 - 100, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score stratified by baseline angina frequency
Time Frame: 5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score stratified by baseline angina frequency at at follow-up compared to baseline. The score ranges from 0 - 100, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
Proportion of patients with good response, no angina, and excellent health status
Time Frame: 5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
Difference between targeted medical therapy group and placebo group in proportion of patients with good response (Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score ≥ 10), no angina (Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency score = 100), and excellent health status (Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score ≥ 75).
5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
Major adverse cardiac events
Time Frame: 5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)
Difference between targeted medical therapy group and placebo group in incidence of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and hospital presentation for unstable angina.
5-7 weeks (depending on drug titration period)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Tremmel, MD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Angina Pectoris

Clinical Trials on Amlodipine

Subscribe