The Impact of Socioeconomic Determinants on the Patient Reported Outcomes in Young Breast Cancer Patients After Breast Surgery

The Impact of Socioeconomic Determinants on the Patient Reported Outcomes in Young Breast Cancer Patients After Breast Surgery: an Observational Cohort Study

Breast-conserving surgery is the standard treatment for young breast cancer patients, while mastectomy with breast reconstruction is an alternative for those who are not eligible for Breast-conserving surgery. Several studies have compared the quality of life and patient satisfaction among individuals receiving different types of surgery (Breast-conserving surgery, mastectomy alone, or mastectomy with reconstruction). For example, Meghan R. demonstrated that patients undergoing Breast-conserving surgery experience a higher quality of life compared to those undergoing mastectomy with breast reconstruction, whereas J. Dauplat's study showed that patients who undergo mastectomy with breast reconstruction report a higher quality of life than those who undergo mastectomy alone.

However, the investigators hypothesize that the advantages of a specific type of surgery over another, such as Breast-conserving surgery versus breast reconstruction, may vary among patients with different socioeconomic factors. For instance, the benefits of breast reconstruction over Breast-conserving surgery might be more pronounced in young patients who require a more socially active lifestyle.

Additionally, the benefits of one type of surgery over another may also vary at different time points during post-operative follow-up. Furthermore, it is worth noting that most current studies have been conducted in Caucasian populations. In contrast to Caucasians, Asians typically have smaller breast volumes, potentially leading to more significant defects after Breast-conserving surgery and possibly poorer aesthetic outcomes. Therefore, a study focusing on Asian young breast cancer populations is necessary.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective, observational cohort study aiming to enroll 1000 young Chinese breast cancer patients and assign them to three arms: Breast-conserving surgery, mastectomy alone, and mastectomy with breast reconstruction, based on their clinical decisions and preferences. Clinicopathological features (age,Tumor, Node, Metastasis stages, pathological features, etc.), socioeconomic determinants (education level, income, insurance status, marital status, occupational status, personality, etc.), treatment information (neoadjuvant chemotherapy or not, post-operative complications), and survival (local recurrence, metastasis) will be recorded.

All patients will be followed at 6 and 12 months for the first year after diagnosis, then yearly thereafter for an additional 9 years (for a total follow-up of at least 10 years following diagnosis). During the post-operative follow-up, quality of life, psychological well-being, decision regret, surgical information, treatment costs, and surveillance-follow-up will be recorded.

The primary endpoint of this study is the quality of life, assessed using the Breast-Q and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Secondary endpoints include decisional conflict scale, decision regret scales, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

The primary and secondary endpoints will be compared among the three arms, and the impact of socioeconomic determinants at baseline on these endpoints will also be investigated. Additionally, the investigators aim to explore the potential of a novel subtyping method for young breast cancer patients using selected socioeconomic determinants.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
        • Recruiting
        • Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University
        • Contact:
          • Kai Chen, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Young breast cancer women.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 50 years old.
  • The surgery time and procedure have been confirmed, and the surgical informed consent and research informed consent forms have been signed.
  • Informed consent obtained from patient.
  • Unilateral Breast Cancer.
  • Good health,the patient is able to tolerate general anesthesia and surgery, with an ECOG performance status of ≤2 points.
  • No history of breast/axillary radiation therapy.
  • Willing and capable of complying with the study protocol visits, treatment plans, and other research procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral breast cancer.
  • Inflammatory breast cancer.
  • Stage IV breast cancer.
  • Physical examination and imaging suggest tumor infiltration into the skin, pectoralis major muscle, and other adjacent tissues.
  • Patients unable to tolerate surgery due to coagulation abnormalities.
  • In patients without evidence of breast cancer in the contralateral breast, requesting contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.
  • In patients who have undergone surgical treatment for breast cancer (including mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery, and mastectomy with implant reconstruction), requesting secondary breast surgery.
  • Patients with a history or current diagnosis of other malignancies, excluding thyroid cancer.
  • The conditions considered unsuitable for inclusion by researchers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Mastectomy
Mastectomy without reconstruction
Breast-conserving surgery
Breast-conserving surgery
Mastectomy with reconstruction
Any type of reconstruction(include implant and autologous)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participant's breast satisfaction assessed by BREAST-Q questionnaire version 2.0
Time Frame: Pre-operation and 10 years
Utilizing the BREAST-Q questionnaire, this measure assesses women's self-reported satisfaction with their breasts and associated quality of life, encompassing psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being. Scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), with higher scores indicating a more favorable outcome.Assessment is conducted preoperatively and 10 years postoperatively.
Pre-operation and 10 years
Participant's health-related quality of life assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: 10 years
Assessed through the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), this self-administered questionnaire consists of 30 items designed to evaluate the health-related quality of life among cancer patients. For questions 1 to 28, a 4-point scale is used, ranging from 1 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very much"), with lower scores indicating a more positive outcome. Questions 29 and 30 employ a 7-point scale, with scores ranging from 1 ("Very poor") to 7 ("Excellent"), where higher scores signify a better outcome.Assessment is conducted 10 years postoperatively.
10 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participant's decisional conflict assessed by Decisional Conflict Scale questionnaire
Time Frame: Pre-Operative
Administered pre-operation, this tool evaluates the patient's conflict regarding the decision for surgery. Each item is rated on a Likert Scale with five responses, ranging from 0 ("Not at All") to 4 ("Extremely"), resulting in a total score ranging from 0 (Less conflicted) to 100 (Highly conflicted).Assessment is conducted preoperatively.
Pre-Operative
Participant's decision regret assessed by Decision Regret Scale questionnaire
Time Frame: 10 years
Conducted during follow-up sessions, this assessment captures the patient's sentiments and remorse regarding the treatment-related decision to undergo surgery. Five items specifically inquire about feelings of regret. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating a greater level of decision-related regret.Assessment is conducted 10 years postoperatively.
10 years
Participant's anxiety and depression assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire
Time Frame: Pre-operation and 10 years
Administered during follow-ups, this scale measures the patient's psychological change. The HADS comprises two 7-item subscales assessing depression and anxiety symptoms separately. Higher scores indicate greater levels of depression and/or anxiety.Assessment is conducted preoperatively and 10 years postoperatively.
Pre-operation and 10 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Influence of Socioeconomic, Psychological, and Clinicopathological Factors on Outcomes
Time Frame: Pre-operation and 10 years
Exploring the Influence of Socioeconomic, Psychological, and Clinicopathological Features on Primary and Secondary Outcomes.
Pre-operation and 10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 29, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2035

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2035

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SYSKY-2024-147-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The study protocol and the raw and clean data for analysis will be shared among the participated researchers. Non-researchers could obtain relevant informations from the researchers upon reasonable requests.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Breast-conserving surgery

Subscribe