TPVB or SPSIPB in Pain Management After VATS

January 2, 2025 updated by: Kamil Darcin, Koç University

Paravertebral Block or Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block in Pain Management After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the analgesic efficacy of thoracal paravertebral block (TPVB) and serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block (SPSIPB) in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The main questions it aims to answer are:

How will the total perioperative opioid consumption of the patients receiving two different blocks change? How will TPVB and SPSIPB effect the patients' numeric rating scores for pain in the postoperative 24-hour period? How will TPVB and SPSIPB effect the incidence of opioid related side effects?

Participants will be divided in two groups:

TPVB group will receive a TPVB before the surgery. SPSIPB group will receive a SPSIPB nerve block before the surgery. Researchers will compare the results between the groups to see the postoperative effects concerning opioid consumption as well as the pain scores, respiratory parameters and opioid associated side effects.

The hypothesis of this study is that participants receiving SPSIPB for VATS will have a less total opioid consumption 24 hours postoperatively.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries require a surgical incision of the lateral thoracic wall. In order to ease the postoperative pain of patients undergoing VATS, some regional anaesthesia techniques have been tried but there is no consensus on the best method. The gold standard peripheric nerve block is considered to be thoracal paravertebral block (TPVB). Recently, a new nerve block called serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block (SPSIPB) has been described. The anatomic and radiologic studies of SPSIPB suggest that the local anaesthetic distributes from C7 to T10 vertebrates, covering the surgical site of VATS. This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of TPVB and SPSIPB for VATS. The hypothesis is that participants receiving SPSIPB for VATS will have a less total opioid consumption 24 hours postoperatively. Also, the postoperative pain scores and opioid related side effects of the participants will be recorded. Participants will be divided in two groups. The group P will receive a TPVB preoperatively in the operating room. The group S will receive a SPSIPB preoperatively in the operating room. The participants will be followed 24 hours postoperatively and their total opioid consumption, numeric rating scores for pain, incidence of opioid related side effects will be recorded. Also the participants and the surgical teams perioperative pain related satisfaction will be evaluated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • İstanbul, Turkey, 34010
        • Recruiting
        • Koc University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kamil Darçın

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients between the age of 18-80 undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to local anaesthetics Chronic opioid use history Patients with psychiatric disorders Patients who are not open to communication Patients with chronic organ failure Patients that do not give consent Patients that need emergency surgery within the first 24 hours of the initial surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group S
Participants who will be receiving a serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block with a single dose of 30 ml of %0,25 bupivacaine
Before the induction of general anesthesia, under aseptic conditions, serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block will be performed with a single dose of 30 ml of %0,25 bupivacaine with ultrasound guidance, by the senior anaesthesiologist.
Active Comparator: Group P
Participants who will be receiving a thoracal paravertebral block with a single dose of 30 ml of %0,25 bupivacaine
Before the induction of general anesthesia, under aseptic conditions, paravertebral block will be performed with a single dose of 30 ml of %0,25 bupivacaine with ultrasound guidance, by the senior anaesthesiologist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total opioid consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours post-surgery
all consumed opioids will be converted in morphine equivalents and then added to reach the total dosage
24 hours post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric rating scale scores for pain
Time Frame: 24 hours post-surgery
the scale between 0: no pain and 10:highes pain answered by the participants
24 hours post-surgery
Opioid related side effects
Time Frame: 24 hours post-surgery
Nausea, vomiting, pruritis, respiratory depression assessed by yes/no questions
24 hours post-surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kamil Darçın, MD, Koc University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 3, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Starting from 6 months after publication for 5 years

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

no access criteria

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Regional Anesthesia Morbidity

Clinical Trials on Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block

Subscribe