Effect of EMD Protocol for Urge on Dermatology-specific Quality of Life (EMD-U vs CAU)

November 18, 2025 updated by: Tamar Nijsten

The Effect of the EMD Protocol for Urge Compared to Care as Usual on Dermatology-specific Quality of Life

The primary objective of this open randomised controlled trial is to assess the add-on effect of EMD-U compared to CAU alone, in improving dermatology-specific quality of life in patients with atopic dermatitis or prurigo nodularis who suffer from severe scratching behaviour.

The main study parameter is the difference in treatment effect between EMD-U and CAU at T2, measured with the Skindex-29 symptoms scale. There are five measurement points: T0, T1 after 4 weeks, T2 after 8 weeks, T3 after 12 weeks, and T4 after 6 months.

Patients are randomly allocated to either the EMD-U or CAU condition.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: The EMD protocol for urge (EMD-U) is a recently developed treatment that combines elements of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy, Cognitive Behaviour therapy, and hypnotherapy. EMD-U aims to reduce the urge for scratching behaviour through desensitization techniques, self-registration of behaviour, and homework assignments. The EMD-U treatment has shown promising results in reducing scratching behaviour in patients with atopic dermatitis and is currently being investigated in patients with prurigo nodularis. Yet, the added value of the brief EMD-U intervention in addition to the care as usual (CAU) in improving dermatology-specific quality of life is unknown.

Objective: The primary objective of the study is to assess the add-on effect of EMD-U compared to CAU alone, in improving dermatology-specific quality of life in patients with atopic dermatitis or prurigo nodularis who suffer from severe scratching behaviour.

Study design: An open randomised controlled trial, with two arms: 1) EMD-U, 2) CAU (control). There are five measurement points: T0, T1 after 4 weeks, T2 after 8 weeks, T3 after 12 weeks, and T4 after 6 months.

Study population: Patients with atopic dermatitis or prurigo nodularis who suffer from substantial scratching behaviour.

Intervention (if applicable): Patients are randomly allocated to either the EMD-U or CAU condition.

The EMD-U treatment lasts eight weeks, in which two EMD-U sessions and two phone calls take place in the first three weeks. After the first EMD-U session, patients are instructed to apply the learned technique at home until the end of the study. In the five following weeks, patients are phoned twice to ask for their experiences with the practicing at home.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015 GD
        • Erasmus University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 ≥
  • A confirmed diagnosis of atopic dermatitis or prurigo nodularis
  • Suffering from persistent and frequent scratching behaviour
  • IGA-CPG activity score ≥ 3 OR Skindex-29 symptoms subscale score ≥ 42
  • Stable course of treatment in the two weeks prior to the study (no medication change, etc.)
  • Sufficiently motivated to take part in a new intervention aimed at behaviour change

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Insufficient understanding of Dutch language
  • Severe psychiatric disorders that require treatment first, such as delusional disorder or major depression
  • If medication is changed during the course of the study, the participant will be considered a drop-out from the moment the medication has changed.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EMD-U
The EMD-U treatment lasts eight weeks, in which two EMD-U sessions of 60 minutes and two phone calls take place in the first three weeks. In the five following weeks, patients are phoned twice to ask for their experiences with the practicing at home. An important part of EMD-U consists of homework exercises. These homework exercises comprise to practice/apply the intervention as learned during the sessions with the therapist, in those situations wherein the urge to scratch their skin is present. In the text below, we will explain in more detail what the treatment protocol entails. Patients in this condition receive the EMD-U treatment in addition to the care as usual.
During the EMD-U sessions, the patient is asked to focus on the spot on his/her skin where the urge to scratch is highest. The patient is asked to rate the level of urge to scratch this spot on a 10-point scale and to imagine that they scratch this spot as they would like. At the same time eye movements are offered for 30 seconds. This procedure is repeated until the level of urge to scratch has become nihil. This procedure is repeated for all other skin parts where the patient experiences an urge to scratch, until there are no skin parts left. As a homework assignment straight after the first session, the patient is instructed and encouraged to practice the same intervention at home. The two EMD-U sessions and two phone calls, take place in the first three weeks of the study. In the five following weeks, patients are phoned twice to ask for their experiences with the practicing at home.
Patients in the control group receive care as usual (CAU), which is the standard care of the dermatologist. In addition to completing the questionnaires at T0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 these patients are not offered any additional treatment or support aimed at their scratching behaviour.
Active Comparator: Care as Usual
Patients in the control group receive care as usual (CAU), which is the standard care of the dermatologist. In addition to completing the questionnaires at T0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 these patients are not offered any additional treatment or support aimed at their scratching behaviour.
Patients in the control group receive care as usual (CAU), which is the standard care of the dermatologist. In addition to completing the questionnaires at T0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 these patients are not offered any additional treatment or support aimed at their scratching behaviour.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Skindex-29
Time Frame: measured at the start of the study (T0), in week 4 (T1), in week 8 (T2), and during follow-up, in week 12 (T3) and six months after T0 (T4).
The main study outcome is the dermatology-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL). It consists of 30 items to be scored on a 5-point response scale. Outcome ranges from 0 (never) to 100 (all the time). The sum of scores is devided by the number of items answered. Higher scores indicate worse quality of life. The instrument has three subscales: symptoms, emotions, and functioning.
measured at the start of the study (T0), in week 4 (T1), in week 8 (T2), and during follow-up, in week 12 (T3) and six months after T0 (T4).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)
Time Frame: Measured at the start of the study (T0), in week 4 (T1), in week 8 (T2), and during follow-up, in week 12 (T3) and six months after T0 (T4).

This is a validated scoring system that grades the physical signs of atopic dermatitis/eczema.

The minimum EASI score is 0 and the maximum EASI score is 72. Higher scores indicate higher disease activity.

Measured at the start of the study (T0), in week 4 (T1), in week 8 (T2), and during follow-up, in week 12 (T3) and six months after T0 (T4).
Investigator Global Assessment (IGA)
Time Frame: Measured at the start of the study (T0), in week 4 (T1), in week 8 (T2), and during follow-up, in week 12 (T3) and six months after T0 (T4).
The IGA is a 5-point tool for the objective assessment of chronic prurigo. The IGA for stage of chronic nodular prurigo (CNPG) and signs of activity in chronic prurigo are used. Items range from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). Higher scores indicate higher disease activity.
Measured at the start of the study (T0), in week 4 (T1), in week 8 (T2), and during follow-up, in week 12 (T3) and six months after T0 (T4).
EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: Measured at the start of the study (T0), in week 4 (T1), in week 8 (T2), and during follow-up, in week 12 (T3) and six months after T0 (T4).

It is a generic instrument that can be used in a wide range of health conditions and treatments. The EQ-5D-5L consists of a descriptive system and the EQ VAS. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale.

Health state index scores generally range from less than 0 (where 0 is the value of a health state equivalent to dead; negative values representing values as worse than dead) to 1 (the value of full health), with higher scores indicating higher health utility. The visual analogue scale (VAS), on which the patient rates his/her perceived health, ranges from 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health).

Measured at the start of the study (T0), in week 4 (T1), in week 8 (T2), and during follow-up, in week 12 (T3) and six months after T0 (T4).
The Self-Control Cognition Questionnaire, Dutch: Zelfcontrole Cognitie Vragenlijst (ZCCL)
Time Frame: Measured at the start of the study (T0), in week 4 (T1), in week 8 (T2), and during follow-up, in week 12 (T3) and six months after T0 (T4).
The ZCCL is an 11-item self-report questionnaire measuring perceived self-control. There are two subscales: 'positive reward' (of the unwanted behaviour) and 'difficulty resisting'. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not applicable at all) to 5 (totally applicable). Total score ranges from 11-55. Higher scores indicate less self-control.
Measured at the start of the study (T0), in week 4 (T1), in week 8 (T2), and during follow-up, in week 12 (T3) and six months after T0 (T4).
Patient Health Questionnaire for anxiety and depression (PHQ-4)
Time Frame: Measured at the start of the study (T0), in week 4 (T1), in week 8 (T2), and during follow-up, in week 12 (T3) and six months after T0 (T4).
The PHQ-4 is a brief self-report screening tool for depression and anxiety, consisting of four items. Two items on depression, and two items on anxiety are scored with a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Higher scores indicate more depression and anxiety symptoms.
Measured at the start of the study (T0), in week 4 (T1), in week 8 (T2), and during follow-up, in week 12 (T3) and six months after T0 (T4).
Skin Picking Scale (SPS)
Time Frame: Measured at the start of the study (T0), in week 4 (T1), in week 8 (T2), and during follow-up, in week 12 (T3) and six months after T0 (T4).
a six-item self-report measure for the assessment of skin picking behaviour. The scale has a total score range of 0-24. Higher scores indicate more skin picking.
Measured at the start of the study (T0), in week 4 (T1), in week 8 (T2), and during follow-up, in week 12 (T3) and six months after T0 (T4).

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Life Events Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5)
Time Frame: At start of study (T0)
The LEC-5 is a 17-item self-report questionnaire designed to screen for potentially traumatic events in a respondent's lifetime. It identifies whether the person has gone through any of the listed events, and there is no definitive scoring procedure or interpretation involved. Respondents indicate varying levels of exposure to each type of potentially traumatic event included on a 6-point nominal scale, and respondents may endorse multiple levels of exposure to the same trauma type. The LEC-5 does not yield a total score or composite score.
At start of study (T0)
Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q)
Time Frame: At start of study (T0)
The TEX-Q is a 15-item self-report questionnaire assessing patients' expectations of medical and psychological treatments. The scale of the items ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate higher expectations. The English version of the TEX-Q will be translated into Dutch, using the FACIT translation methodology.
At start of study (T0)
Mental imagery
Time Frame: At start of study (T0)
patients are requested to assess their capacity for engaging in visuomotor activities through mental imagery, utilizing a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (totally disagree) to 3 (totally agree). A higher score indicates better imagination capacity.
At start of study (T0)
Visits
Time Frame: Six months after start study (T4)
Number of hospital visits and medication
Six months after start study (T4)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rick Waalboer-Spuij, MD, PhD, Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Dermatology
  • Principal Investigator: Leonieke W Kranenburg, PhD, Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, Section Medical Psychology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 11, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No IPD is shared due to privacy issues

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atopic Dermatitis

Clinical Trials on EMD Protocol for Urge

Subscribe