- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06436261
Evaluating Procedure Pairing of a Post-Procedure Cream Versus a Comparator in Patients Treated With a Hybrid-Fractional Laser for Facial Rejuvenation
A Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Blinded, Split-Face, Controlled Study Evaluating Procedure Pairing of a Post-Procedure Cream Versus a Comparator in Patients Treated With a Hybrid-Factional Laser for Facial Rejuvenation
This randomized, multi-center, double-blinded, split-face, controlled clinical trial was conducted to investigate the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of a post-procedure cream when used immediately after hybrid-fractional laser treatment and for 7 days post-procedure with three times daily application in healthy female subjects aged 35-65 years with moderate to severe global face photodamage (score of 4 to 7 out of the 10-point Modified Griffiths' scale). Furthermore, this clinical trial compared the active post-procedure cream to a comparator moisturizer often paired with skin rejuvenation procedures. This is a cosmetic study with an FDA-regulated device.
A total of 16 healthy female subjects completed the study (8 subjects at both sites).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This randomized, multi-center, double-blinded, split-face, controlled clinical trial was conducted to investigate the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of a post-procedure cream when used immediately after hybrid-fractional laser treatment and for 7 days post-procedure with three times daily application in healthy female subjects aged 35-65 years with moderate to severe global face photodamage (score of 4 to 7 out of the 10-point modified Griffith's scale). The ability of the post-procedure cream to soothe skin and improve patient downtime post-procedure was investigated by evaluating tolerability parameters (erythema, edema, dryness, burning, itching, stinging) over the course of the study. Furthermore, this clinical trial compared the active post-procedure cream to a comparator moisturizer often paired with skin rejuvenation procedures.
A 7-day washout period was required of all subjects prior to hybrid-fractional laser treatment. Tolerability (investigator: erythema, edema, dryness; subject: burning, itching, stinging) and safety were assessed through grading at screening, pre-procedure, post-procedure, post-procedure/post-product application, and days 1, 3, 5, and 7 post-procedure.
In addition, efficacy evaluation using the Modified Griffiths' scale was performed at screening, pre-procedure, and day 7 post-procedure. Self-assessment questionnaires were completed by subjects post-procedure/post-product application and days 1, 5, and 7 post-procedure. Clinical photography was completed at screening, pre-procedure, post-procedure/post-product application, and days 1, 3, 5, and 7 post-procedure.
A total of 16 healthy female subjects completed the study (8 subjects at both sites).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30305
- AYA™ Medical Spa
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75225
- Resurrect Skin MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy female subjects 35-65 years of age
- Fitzpatrick Skin Type I to III
- Moderate to severe global face photodamage (score of 4 to 7 out of the 10-point Modified Griffiths' scale, where 0 = none and 9 = severe)
- No known medical conditions that, in the Investigator's opinion, may interfere with study participation.
- Willing to discontinue all active topical facial products and only use the assigned test products for the duration of the study.
- Female subjects of childbearing potential must be willing to use a form of birth control during the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Nursing, pregnant, or planning a pregnancy during this study.
- Having undergone a chemical peel, dermabrasion, or microneedling (mechanical and radiofrequency) in the last 6 months; laser resurfacing (ablative, fractional, non-ablative) in the last 12 months
- Not willing to discontinue active topical facial products for 7 days prior to the Baseline Visit
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Split-Face Application of Active
Active (Experimental) Post-Procedure Cream Dosage Form: reverse emulsion (water in oil) cream containing bioactive ingredients, botanical actives, peptides, and antioxidants. Frequency of Dosage: Three times daily (morning, afternoon, and evening). Subjects were asked to apply to the face, forehead, under eyes, cheeks, upper lips, chin, and nose. The product was labelled with Right or Left depending on split-face randomization. Study Duration: 14 days. Active Post-Procedure Cream duration 14 days. |
A hybrid fractional HALO™ laser treatment was performed after a 7-day washout period.
Subjects were numbed for 30 minutes to 1 hour prior to the procedure with a topical numbing cream containing benzocaine, lidocaine, and/or tetracaine.
After numbing was completed, patients received one full-face HALO™ laser treatment with settings 350/20/20.
Other Names:
Subjects were to use the provided cleanser twice daily (morning and evening) during the 7-day washout period and 7-day post-procedure timeline.
Other Names:
Subjects were to use the provided bland facial moisturizer as follows: WASHOUT PERIOD (7 days): After cleansing, 1-2 pumps were to be applied twice daily (morning and evening) to the full face avoiding the eye area POST-PROCEDURE (7 days): After applying the Post-Procedure Cream and Active Comparator based on split-face randomization, the facial moisturizer was to be applied twice daily (morning and afternoon).
During the 7-day washout period and 7-day post-procedure timeline, subjects were to apply the provided basic sunscreen in the morning and afternoon after applying facial moisturizer.
Sunscreen was to be reapplied as needed throughout the day per FDA recommendations.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Split-Face Application of Comparator
COMPARATOR: Dosage Form: moisturizer formulation Comparator Moisturizer Frequency of Dosage: Three times daily (morning, afternoon, and evening). Subjects were asked to apply to the face, forehead, under eyes, cheeks, upper lips, chin, and nose. The product was labelled with Right or Left depending on split-face randomization. Study Duration: 14 days. Comparator duration 14 days. |
A hybrid fractional HALO™ laser treatment was performed after a 7-day washout period.
Subjects were numbed for 30 minutes to 1 hour prior to the procedure with a topical numbing cream containing benzocaine, lidocaine, and/or tetracaine.
After numbing was completed, patients received one full-face HALO™ laser treatment with settings 350/20/20.
Other Names:
Subjects were to use the provided cleanser twice daily (morning and evening) during the 7-day washout period and 7-day post-procedure timeline.
Other Names:
Subjects were to use the provided bland facial moisturizer as follows: WASHOUT PERIOD (7 days): After cleansing, 1-2 pumps were to be applied twice daily (morning and evening) to the full face avoiding the eye area POST-PROCEDURE (7 days): After applying the Post-Procedure Cream and Active Comparator based on split-face randomization, the facial moisturizer was to be applied twice daily (morning and afternoon).
During the 7-day washout period and 7-day post-procedure timeline, subjects were to apply the provided basic sunscreen in the morning and afternoon after applying facial moisturizer.
Sunscreen was to be reapplied as needed throughout the day per FDA recommendations.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Investigator Tolerability
Time Frame: 7 days
|
The primary tolerability endpoint will be Investigator Tolerability Assessment of erythema, edema, and dryness. A change in score of lack of significant change post-procedure/post-product application and days 1, 3, 5, and 7 post-procedure in comparison to immediately post-procedure indicates tolerability/safety of the test material. A four-point scale will be used with a lower score indicating a better outcome: 0 = None
|
7 days
|
|
Incidence of Adverse Events
Time Frame: 7 days
|
The primary safety endpoint will be determined by the incidence and severity of adverse events in healthy subjects, including immediately post-procedure and throughout the length of the study.
|
7 days
|
|
Subject Tolerability
Time Frame: 7 days
|
The subject tolerability endpoint will be Subject Tolerability Assessment of burning, itching, and stinging. A change in score of lack of significant change post-procedure/post-product application and days 1, 3, 5, and 7 post-procedure in comparison to immediately post-procedure indicates tolerability/safety of the test material. A four-point scale will be used with a lower score indicating a better outcome: 0 = None
|
7 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-Assessment Questionnaire
Time Frame: 7 days
|
A change in response values at days 1, 5, and 7 compared to post-procedure/post-product application response values indicates an improvement.
Baseline responses will be set to post-procedure/post-product application.
Subjects are asked to rate statements based on a scoring system ranging from 5 (completely agree) to 1 (completely disagree).
The best outcome is to Completely Agree with the statement / question being asked.
|
7 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jay Burns, MD, Resurrect Skin MD
- Principal Investigator: James Namnoum, MD, AYA™ Medical Spa
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- RS-2021-03
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Wrinkle
-
Physicians Laser and Dermatology InstituteRecruiting
-
Shanghai Dermatology HospitalRecruiting
-
Integrative Skin Science and ResearchActera (Sponsor)Completed
-
Cynosure, Inc.Terminated
-
Saie BeautyCompleted
-
Innate srl1MedRecruiting
-
Croma-Pharma GmbHActive, not recruiting
-
Amazentis SAPrinceton Consumer ResearchCompleted
-
HaEmek Medical Center, IsraelUnknown
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...Universitair Medical Centrum GroningenNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Hybrid Fractional Laser
-
ScitonCompletedVaginal Atrophy, Sexual Dysfunction, Vaginal Dryness, DyspareuniaUnited States
-
ScitonCompleted
-
ScitonCompletedSexual Dysfunction | Vaginal Atrophy | Vaginal Dryness | Dyspareunia | Chronic UTIUnited States
-
ScitonCompletedUrinary Incontinence | Stress Urinary Incontinence | Urge IncontinenceUnited States
-
Albert Einstein College of MedicineRecruitingHyperpigmentation | Acne Scars - Mixed Atrophic and Hypertrophic | Laser-Induced HyperpigmentationUnited States
-
University of RochesterCompletedAcne Scars - Mixed Atrophic and HypertrophicUnited States
-
Bispebjerg HospitalLumenis Be Ltd.Completed
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Laserklinik KarlsruheCompleted
-
Mahidol UniversityCompleted