- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06459401
Effects of an Overground Propulsion Neuroprosthesis in Community-dwelling Individuals After Stroke
Study Overview
Detailed Description
This interventional study evaluates the effects of an overground propulsion neuroprosthesis that delivers adaptive neurostimulation assistance to the paretic plantarflexors and dorsiflexors of people post-stroke. Individuals with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis will walk with and without the neuroprosthesis overground and on a treadmill. The goal of the study is to understand how adaptive neurostimulation delivered by the neuroprosthesis affects clinical and biomechanical measures of walking function in order to guide future rehabilitation approaches for restoring walking ability after stroke.
Ten individuals with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis will complete a single session of walking with and without the neuroprosthesis. Study evaluations will be conducted both before and after the session, without the neuroprosthesis active, and during the neuroprosthesis-supported walking.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02134
- Science and Engineering Complex
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
- Neuromotor Recovery Laboratory
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of a stroke event occurring at least 6 months ago
- Observable gait deficits
- Independent ambulation for at least 30 meters (using an assistive device as needed but without a rigid brace or ankle foot orthosis)
- Passive ankle dorsiflexion range of motion to neutral with the knee extended
- Ability to follow a 3-step command
- Resting heart rate between 40-100 bpm
- Resting blood pressure between 90/60 and 170/90 mmHg
- NIH Stroke Scale Question 1b score > 1 and Question 1c score > 0
- HIPAA Authorization to allow communication with healthcare provider
- Medical clearance by a physician
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe aphasia or inability to communicate with investigators
- Neglect or hemianopia
- Serious comorbidities that may interfere with ability to participate in the research (e.g. musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, pulmonary)
- Pacemakers or similar electrical implants that could be affected by electrical stimulation
- Metal implants directly under the stimulation sites
- Pressure ulcers or skin wounds located near human-device interface sites
- More than 2 unexplained falls in the previous month
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Neuroprosthesis-Assisted Walking Evaluation
Participants with chronic stroke will perform a series of short overground walking evaluations at a self-selected fast walking speed with the neuroprosthesis powered and unpowered.
When the neuroprosthesis is powered, it provides active neurostimulation assistance for foot clearance and propulsion.
When the neuroprosthesis is unpowered, it is worn by the participant but does not provide active assistance.
|
A neuroprosthesis is a textile-based surface neurostimulation system worn on the waist and paretic lower limb that delivers neurostimulation assistance via electroconductive pads placed on the skin over the target muscles.
The neuroprosthesis provides dorsiflexor stimulation during swing phase for foot clearance and plantarflexor stimulation during stance phase for propulsion, delivered synchronously based on integrated sensors detecting the wearer's gait pattern.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Immediate Change in Walking Speed
Time Frame: Early Neurostimulation Timing Condition (40% stance); Late Neurostimulation Timing Condition (60% stance)
|
Change in walking speed from unassisted walking to walking with neurostimulation assistance at either an early or a late timing, measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Early timing of plantarflexor neurostimulation was delivered at 40% of paretic limb support phase (before mid-stance).
Late timing of plantarflexor neurostimulation was delivered at 60% of paretic limb support phase (after mid-stance).
|
Early Neurostimulation Timing Condition (40% stance); Late Neurostimulation Timing Condition (60% stance)
|
|
Immediate Change in Paretic Propulsion
Time Frame: Early Neurostimulation Timing Condition (40% stance); Late Neurostimulation Timing Condition (60% stance)
|
Change in paretic propulsion from unassisted walking to walking with neurostimulation assistance at either an early or a late timing, measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Early timing of plantarflexor neurostimulation was delivered at 40% of paretic limb support phase (before mid-stance).
Late timing of plantarflexor neurostimulation was delivered at 60% of paretic limb support phase (after mid-stance).
Paretic propulsion was calculated as the peak anterior-posterior ground reaction force of the paretic limb.
|
Early Neurostimulation Timing Condition (40% stance); Late Neurostimulation Timing Condition (60% stance)
|
|
Immediate Change in Propulsion Symmetry
Time Frame: Early Neurostimulation Timing Condition (40% stance); Late Neurostimulation Timing Condition (60% stance)
|
Change in propulsion symmetry from unassisted walking to walking with neurostimulation assistance at either an early or a late timing, measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Early timing of plantarflexor neurostimulation was delivered at 40% of paretic limb support phase (before mid-stance).
Late timing of plantarflexor neurostimulation was delivered at 60% of paretic limb support phase (after mid-stance).
Propulsion symmetry was calculated as the propulsion impulse of the paretic limb divided by the total propulsion impulse (paretic + nonparetic).
Propulsion impulse is the area under the positive portion of the anterior-posterior ground reaction force curve.
|
Early Neurostimulation Timing Condition (40% stance); Late Neurostimulation Timing Condition (60% stance)
|
|
Immediate Change in Walking Speed
Time Frame: Early Neurostimulation Timing Condition (40% stance); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
Change in walking speed from unassisted walking to walking with neurostimulation assistance at either an early timing or an individual-specific preferred timing, measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Early timing of plantarflexor neurostimulation was delivered at 40% of paretic limb support phase (before mid-stance).
Timing preference was determined for each participant individually based on which of the early or late timings produced greater paretic propulsion.
|
Early Neurostimulation Timing Condition (40% stance); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
|
Immediate Change in Paretic Propulsion
Time Frame: Early Neurostimulation Timing Condition (40% stance); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
Change in paretic propulsion from unassisted walking to walking with neurostimulation assistance at either an early timing or an individual-specific preferred timing, measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Early timing of plantarflexor neurostimulation was delivered at 40% of paretic limb support phase (before mid-stance).
Timing preference was determined for each participant individually based on which of the early or late timings produced greater paretic propulsion.
Paretic propulsion was calculated as the peak anterior-posterior ground reaction force of the paretic limb.
|
Early Neurostimulation Timing Condition (40% stance); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
|
Immediate Change in Propulsion Symmetry
Time Frame: Early Neurostimulation Timing Condition (40% stance); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
Change in propulsion symmetry from unassisted walking to walking with neurostimulation assistance at either an early timing or an individual-specific preferred timing, measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Early timing of plantarflexor neurostimulation was delivered at 40% of paretic limb support phase (before mid-stance).
Timing preference was determined for each participant individually based on which of the early or late timings produced greater paretic propulsion.
Propulsion symmetry was calculated as the propulsion impulse of the paretic limb divided by the total propulsion impulse (paretic + nonparetic).
Propulsion impulse is the area under the positive portion of the anterior-posterior ground reaction force curve.
|
Early Neurostimulation Timing Condition (40% stance); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
|
Immediate Change in Walking Speed
Time Frame: Late Neurostimulation Timing Condition (60% stance); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
Change in walking speed from unassisted walking to walking with neurostimulation assistance at either a late timing or an individual-specific preferred timing, measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Late timing of plantarflexor neurostimulation was delivered at 60% of paretic limb support phase (before mid-stance).
Timing preference was determined for each participant individually based on which of the early or late timings produced greater paretic propulsion.
|
Late Neurostimulation Timing Condition (60% stance); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
|
Immediate Change in Paretic Propulsion
Time Frame: Late Neurostimulation Timing Condition (60% stance); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
Change in paretic propulsion from unassisted walking to walking with neurostimulation assistance at either a late timing or an individual-specific preferred timing, measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Late timing of plantarflexor neurostimulation was delivered at 60% of paretic limb support phase (after mid-stance).
Timing preference was determined for each participant individually based on which of the early or late timings produced greater paretic propulsion.
Paretic propulsion was calculated as the peak anterior-posterior ground reaction force of the paretic limb.
|
Late Neurostimulation Timing Condition (60% stance); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
|
Immediate Change in Propulsion Symmetry
Time Frame: Late Neurostimulation Timing Condition (60% stance); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
Change in propulsion symmetry from unassisted walking to walking with neurostimulation assistance at either a late timing or an individual-specific preferred timing, measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Late timing of plantarflexor neurostimulation was delivered at 60% of paretic limb support phase (before mid-stance).
Timing preference was determined for each participant individually based on which of the early or late timings produced greater paretic propulsion.
Propulsion symmetry was calculated as the propulsion impulse of the paretic limb divided by the total propulsion impulse (paretic + nonparetic).
Propulsion impulse is the area under the positive portion of the anterior-posterior ground reaction force curve.
|
Late Neurostimulation Timing Condition (60% stance); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
|
Immediate Change in Walking Speed
Time Frame: Non-Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
Change in walking speed from unassisted walking to walking with neurostimulation assistance at either a non-preferred or a preferred timing, measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Timing preference was determined for each participant individually based on which of the early or late timings produced greater paretic propulsion.
|
Non-Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
|
Immediate Change in Paretic Propulsion
Time Frame: Non-Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
Change in paretic propulsion from unassisted walking to walking with neurostimulation assistance at either a non-preferred or a preferred timing, measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Timing preference was determined for each participant individually based on which of the early or late timings produced greater paretic propulsion.
Paretic propulsion was calculated as the peak anterior-posterior ground reaction force of the paretic limb.
|
Non-Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
|
Immediate Change in Propulsion Symmetry
Time Frame: Non-Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
Change in propulsion symmetry from unassisted walking to walking with neurostimulation assistance at either a non-preferred or a preferred timing, measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Timing preference was determined for each participant individually based on which of the early or late timings produced greater paretic propulsion.
Propulsion symmetry was calculated as the propulsion impulse of the paretic limb divided by the total propulsion impulse (paretic + nonparetic).
Propulsion impulse is the area under the positive portion of the anterior-posterior ground reaction force curve.
|
Non-Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
|
Walking Speed at Non-Preferred Timing
Time Frame: Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
Walking speed with or without neurostimulation assistance measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
|
Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
|
Paretic Propulsion at Non-Preferred Timing
Time Frame: Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
Paretic propulsion with or without neurostimulation assistance measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Paretic propulsion was calculated as the peak anterior-posterior ground reaction force of the paretic limb.
|
Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
|
Propulsion Symmetry at Non-Preferred Timing
Time Frame: Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
Propulsion symmetry with or without neurostimulation assistance measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Paretic propulsion was calculated as the peak anterior-posterior ground reaction force of the paretic limb.
Propulsion symmetry was calculated as the propulsion impulse of the paretic limb divided by the total propulsion impulse (paretic + nonparetic).
Propulsion impulse is the area under the positive portion of the anterior-posterior ground reaction force curve.
|
Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
|
Walking Speed at Preferred Timing
Time Frame: Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
Walking speed with or without neurostimulation assistance measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
|
Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
|
Paretic Propulsion at Preferred Timing
Time Frame: Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
Paretic propulsion with or without neurostimulation assistance measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Paretic propulsion was calculated as the peak anterior-posterior ground reaction force of the paretic limb.
|
Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
|
Propulsion Symmetry at Preferred Timing
Time Frame: Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
Propulsion symmetry with or without neurostimulation assistance measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Paretic propulsion was calculated as the peak anterior-posterior ground reaction force of the paretic limb.
Propulsion symmetry was calculated as the propulsion impulse of the paretic limb divided by the total propulsion impulse (paretic + nonparetic).
Propulsion impulse is the area under the positive portion of the anterior-posterior ground reaction force curve.
|
Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
|
Unassisted Fast Walking Speed
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
Walking speed without neurostimulation assistance measured at a self-selected fast pace using the 10-Meter Walk Test.
|
Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
|
Unassisted Paretic Propulsion at Fast Speed
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
Paretic propulsion during walking without neurostimulation assistance at a self-selected fast pace during the 10-Meter Walk Test.
Paretic propulsion was calculated as the peak anterior-posterior ground reaction force of the paretic limb.
|
Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
|
Unassisted Propulsion Symmetry at Fast Speed
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
Propulsion symmetry during walking without neurostimulation assistance at a self-selected fast pace during the 10-Meter Walk Test.
Propulsion symmetry was calculated as the propulsion impulse of the paretic limb divided by the total propulsion impulse (paretic + nonparetic).
Propulsion impulse is the area under the positive portion of the anterior-posterior ground reaction force curve.
|
Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
|
Unassisted Comfortable Walking Speed
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
Walking speed without neurostimulation assistance measured at a self-selected comfortable pace using the 10-Meter Walk Test.
|
Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
|
Unassisted Paretic Propulsion at Comfortable Speed
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
Paretic propulsion during walking without neurostimulation assistance at a self-selected comfortable pace during the 10-Meter Walk Test.
Paretic propulsion was calculated as the peak anterior-posterior ground reaction force of the paretic limb.
|
Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
|
Unassisted Propulsion Symmetry at Comfortable Speed
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
Propulsion symmetry during walking without neurostimulation assistance at a self-selected comfortable pace during the 10-Meter Walk Test.
Propulsion symmetry was calculated as the propulsion impulse of the paretic limb divided by the total propulsion impulse (paretic + nonparetic).
Propulsion impulse is the area under the positive portion of the anterior-posterior ground reaction force curve.
|
Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Onset Timing of Plantarflexor Neurostimulation
Time Frame: Early Neurostimulation Timing Condition (40% stance); Late Neurostimulation Timing Condition (60% stance)
|
The timepoint in the gait cycle when plantarflexor neurostimulation turns on.
Early timing of plantarflexor neurostimulation was set at 40% of paretic limb support phase (before mid-stance).
Late timing of plantarflexor neurostimulation was set at 60% of paretic limb support phase (after mid-stance).
Actual delivery of neurostimulation may vary based on the inertial sensor based real-time control and sensing of gait features.
|
Early Neurostimulation Timing Condition (40% stance); Late Neurostimulation Timing Condition (60% stance)
|
|
Preferred Neurostimulation Timing
Time Frame: Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
Timing preference was determined for each participant individually based on which of the early or late timings produced greater paretic propulsion.
Early timing of plantarflexor neurostimulation was delivered at 40% of paretic limb support phase (before mid-stance).
Late timing of plantarflexor neurostimulation was delivered at 60% of paretic limb support phase (after mid-stance).
|
Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
|
Dorsiflexion Angle (No Dorsiflexor Impairment)
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention; Non-Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
Dorsiflexion angle during walking at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway for the subset of participants without paretic dorsiflexor impairment.
Timing preference was determined for each participant individually based on which of the early or late timings produced greater paretic propulsion.
Dorsiflexion angle is the positive angle between the foot and the shank from a neutral 90-degree position, measured using optical motion capture.
|
Pre-Intervention; Non-Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
|
Dorsiflexion Angle (With Dorsiflexor Impairment)
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention; Non-Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
Dorsiflexion angle during walking at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway for the subset of participants with paretic dorsiflexor impairment.
Timing preference was determined for each participant individually based on which of the early or late timings produced greater paretic propulsion.
Dorsiflexion angle is the positive angle between the foot and the shank from a neutral 90-degree position, measured using optical motion capture.
Negative dorsiflexion angle indicates plantarflexion of the foot, downwards from a neutral 90-degree position.
|
Pre-Intervention; Non-Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
|
Immediate Change in Dorsiflexion Angle
Time Frame: Non-Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
Change in dorsiflexion angle from unassisted walking to walking with neurostimulation assistance at either a non-preferred or a preferred timing, measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Timing preference was determined for each participant individually based on which of the early or late timings produced greater paretic propulsion.
Dorsiflexion angle is the positive angle between the foot and the shank from a neutral 90-degree position, measured using optical motion capture.
|
Non-Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
|
Immediate Change in Plantarflexor Power
Time Frame: Non-Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
Change in plantarflexor power from unassisted walking to walking with neurostimulation assistance at either a non-preferred or a preferred timing, measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Timing preference was determined for each participant individually based on which of the early or late timings produced greater paretic propulsion.
Plantarflexor power is the peak rate of change in the rotation force of the foot towards the ground, measured using optical motion capture.
|
Non-Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning); Preferred Neurostimulation Timing Condition (propulsion-based tuning)
|
|
Dorsiflexion Angle at Non-Preferred Timing
Time Frame: Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
Dorsiflexion angle with or without neurostimulation assistance measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Dorsiflexion angle is the positive angle between the foot and the shank from a neutral 90-degree position, measured using optical motion capture.
|
Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
|
Plantarflexor Power at Non-Preferred Timing
Time Frame: Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
Plantarflexor power with or without neurostimulation assistance measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Plantarflexor power is the peak rate of change in the rotation force of the foot towards the ground, measured using optical motion capture.
|
Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
|
Dorsiflexion Angle at Preferred Timing
Time Frame: Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
Dorsiflexion angle with or without neurostimulation assistance measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Dorsiflexion angle is the positive angle between the foot and the shank from a neutral 90-degree position, measured using optical motion capture.
|
Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
|
Plantarflexor Power at Preferred Timing
Time Frame: Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
Plantarflexor power with or without neurostimulation assistance measured at a self-selected fast pace across a straight 10-meter walkway.
Plantarflexor power is the peak rate of change in the rotation force of the foot towards the ground, measured using optical motion capture.
|
Unassisted Walking Condition; Assisted Walking Condition
|
|
Unassisted Dorsiflexion Angle at Fast Speed
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
Dorsiflexion angle during walking without neurostimulation assistance at a self-selected fast pace during the 10-Meter Walk Test.
Dorsiflexion angle is the positive angle between the foot and the shank from a neutral 90-degree position, measured using optical motion capture.
|
Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
|
Unassisted Plantarflexor Power at Fast Speed
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
Plantarflexor power during walking without neurostimulation assistance at a self-selected fast pace during the 10-Meter Walk Test.
Plantarflexor power is the peak rate of change in the rotation force of the foot towards the ground, measured using optical motion capture.
|
Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
|
Unassisted Dorsiflexion Angle at Comfortable Speed
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
Dorsiflexion angle during walking without neurostimulation assistance at a self-selected comfortable pace during the 10-Meter Walk Test.
Dorsiflexion angle is the positive angle between the foot and the shank from a neutral 90-degree position, measured using optical motion capture.
|
Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
|
Unassisted Plantarflexor Power at Comfortable Speed
Time Frame: Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
Plantarflexor power during walking without neurostimulation assistance at a self-selected comfortable pace during the 10-Meter Walk Test.
Plantarflexor power is the peak rate of change in the rotation force of the foot towards the ground, measured using optical motion capture.
|
Pre-Intervention; Post-Intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Louis Awad, PT, DPT, PhD, Boston University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bowden MG, Balasubramanian CK, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. Anterior-posterior ground reaction forces as a measure of paretic leg contribution in hemiparetic walking. Stroke. 2006 Mar;37(3):872-6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000204063.75779.8d. Epub 2006 Feb 2.
- Kesar TM, Perumal R, Reisman DS, Jancosko A, Rudolph KS, Higginson JS, Binder-Macleod SA. Functional electrical stimulation of ankle plantarflexor and dorsiflexor muscles: effects on poststroke gait. Stroke. 2009 Dec;40(12):3821-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.560375. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
- Roelker SA, Bowden MG, Kautz SA, Neptune RR. Paretic propulsion as a measure of walking performance and functional motor recovery post-stroke: A review. Gait Posture. 2019 Feb;68:6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.10.027. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
- Chen G, Patten C, Kothari DH, Zajac FE. Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. Gait Posture. 2005 Aug;22(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.06.009.
- Awad LN, Kesar TM, Reisman D, Binder-Macleod SA. Effects of repeated treadmill testing and electrical stimulation on post-stroke gait kinematics. Gait Posture. 2013 Jan;37(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
- Kesar TM, Perumal R, Jancosko A, Reisman DS, Rudolph KS, Higginson JS, Binder-Macleod SA. Novel patterns of functional electrical stimulation have an immediate effect on dorsiflexor muscle function during gait for people poststroke. Phys Ther. 2010 Jan;90(1):55-66. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090140. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
- Hakansson NA, Kesar T, Reisman D, Binder-Macleod S, Higginson JS. Effects of fast functional electrical stimulation gait training on mechanical recovery in poststroke gait. Artif Organs. 2011 Mar;35(3):217-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01215.x.
- Awad LN, Reisman DS, Kesar TM, Binder-Macleod SA. Targeting paretic propulsion to improve poststroke walking function: a preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 May;95(5):840-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.12.012. Epub 2013 Dec 28.
- Awad LN, Hsiao H, Binder-Macleod SA. Central Drive to the Paretic Ankle Plantarflexors Affects the Relationship Between Propulsion and Walking Speed After Stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020 Jan;44(1):42-48. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000299.
- Bae J, Siviy C, Rouleau M, Menard N, O'Donnell K, Galiana I, Athanassiu M, Ryan D, Bibeau C, Sloot L, Kudzia P, Ellis T, Awad L, Walsh CJ. A lightweight and efficient portable soft exosuit for particular ankle assistance in walking after stroke. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). 2018; 2820-2827.
- Nadeau S, Gravel D, Arsenault AB, Bourbonnais D. Plantarflexor weakness as a limiting factor of gait speed in stroke subjects and the compensating role of hip flexors. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1999 Feb;14(2):125-35. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(98)00062-x.
- Choe DK, Aiello AJ, Spangler JE, Walsh CJ, Awad LN. A Propulsion Neuroprosthesis Improves Overground Walking in Community-Dwelling Individuals After Stroke. IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2024 Jul 4;5:563-572. doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3416028. eCollection 2024.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 5715
- U54EB015408 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- 830019 (Other Grant/Funding Number: American Heart Association Pre-Doctoral Fellowship Award)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
National Assembly ClinicBayero University Kano, NigeriaRecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After StrokeNigeria
-
University of PittsburghRecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, EmbolicUnited States
-
Mahidol UniversityNot yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke SurvivorsThailand
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke PatientThailand
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusScuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus...Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Stroke IschemicItaly
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | ExoskeletonSouth Korea
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, CerebrovascularUnited States
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
Clinical Trials on Propulsion Neuroprosthesis
-
Boston University Charles River CampusAmerican Heart Association; Harvard University; National Institute for Biomedical...Completed
-
University of FloridaThe Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence CentersRecruiting
-
Synchron Medical, Inc.WithdrawnParalysis | Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis | Muscular Dystrophies | Neurologic Disorder | Spinal Muscular Atrophy | Spinal Cord Injury | Stroke, Lacunar | Upper Limb Injury | Paralysis; Stroke | Stroke, BrainstemAustralia
-
University Hospital, ToulouseCompletedStroke, RehabilitationFrance
-
MetroHealth Medical CenterNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); Case Western...RecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level | Spinal Cord Injury CervicalUnited States
-
University Hospital, ToulouseRecruiting
-
Boston University Charles River CampusHarvard UniversityCompleted
-
Synchron Medical, Inc.Active, not recruitingParalysis | Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis | Muscular Dystrophies | Spinal Cord Injuries | Neurologic Disorder | Spinal Muscular Atrophy | Cervical Spinal Cord Injury | Stroke, Lacunar | Paralysis; Stroke | Stroke Brainstem | Tetraplegic; Paralysis | Quadriplegia/TetraplegiaUnited States
-
Toronto Rehabilitation InstituteThe Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation; Christopher Reeve Paralysis...Completed
-
University Hospital, ToulouseRecruitingStroke | RéhabilitationFrance