Robot-Assisted Gait Training With Self-Observation in Stroke Rehabilitation

June 27, 2024 updated by: Sahmyook University

The Effects of Robot-Assisted Gait Training Concurrent With Self-Observation Training on Balance, Gait, Cognitive Function in Stroke

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of robot-assisted gait training Concurrent with self-observation training on balance, gait, and cognitive function in stroke participants. The main question it aims to answer is:

Does robot-assisted gait training combined with self-observation improve balance abilities in stroke participants?

Participants will be

Group 1 Perform robot-assisted gait training combined with self-observation five times a week for four weeks.

Group 2 Perform robot-assisted gait training five times a week for four weeks.

All groups perform for 30 minutes per session.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who have had a stroke for more than 6 months but less than 1 year
  • Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) ≥ 2
  • Able to walk 10 meters independently with or without an assistive device
  • Participants eligible for application of the robot (ANGEL LEGS M20, Anger Robotics)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to wear the robot due to open wounds or skin conditions
  • Severe cognitive impairment (MMSE-K < 10) or significant difficulty in communication due to language disorders
  • Spasticity of the paralyzed limb with a Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ≥ 2
  • High risk of fractures, such as osteoporosis
  • Severe cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases
  • Neurological disorders affecting gait function, such as Parkinson's disease or multiple sclerosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: experimental 1 group
Robot-Assisted Gait with Self-Observation

A camera is installed on the walker used in the training, and the recorded video is mirrored in real-time to a tablet computer. Participants can view this video through smart glasses connected to the tablet computer. A glasses strap will be used to secure the glasses, ensuring there is no interference with walking.

Participants will undergo a total of 20 training sessions, five times a week for four weeks, with each session lasting 30 minutes. Participants will have a 4-minute break during the 30-minute gait training session.

Participants will be given a period to adapt to wearing the robot, and after that, the intervention will be conducted based on each participant's individual abilities and adaptation.

Active Comparator: experimental 2 group
Robot-Assisted Gait

Participants will undergo a total of 20 training sessions, five times a week for four weeks, with each session lasting 30 minutes. Participants will have a 4-minute break during the 30-minute gait training session.

Participants will be given a period to adapt to wearing the robot, and after that, the intervention will be conducted based on each participant's individual abilities and adaptation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Balance ability
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

- Timed up and go test (TUG)

Participants sit on a chair with armrests, rise upon hearing a starting signal, walk 3 meters, return, and sit back down. The speed of this task is measured. Participants may use usual walking aids (cane or walker) but should not receive physical assistance.

- Functional Reach Test (FRT)

Participants stand against a wall with feet fixed vertically, arms raised to 90 degrees, reaching forward as far as possible while measuring the distance (in cm) from the tip of the third metacarpal bone.

from enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Gait ability
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

-10 meter walking test (10MWT)

The walking speed is calculated by measuring the time (in seconds) takes for the subject to walk 10 meters. Instructed to walk a total of 14 meters at maximum speed, excluding the first 2 meters and the last 2 meters to account for acceleration and deceleration phases. Participants may use personal walking aids (cane, walker, etc.).

-GAITRite system (CIR Systems Inc., Franklin, New Jersey, USA)

Participants pass over an electronic gait mat to computationally measure temporal and spatial walking variables.

from enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive ability
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

- Mini-Mental Status Examination-Korea, (MMSE-K)

Consists of memory, recall ability, attention, language skills, numerical ability, and constructional ability.

Memory has 10 points, registration has 3 points, attention and calculation have 5 points, recall has 3 points, language function has 7 points, and comprehension and judgment have 2 points, totaling six areas and twelve items

from enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on experimental 2 group

Subscribe